Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Study protocol
  • Open access
  • Published:

Randomized placebo-controlled double-blind phase II study of zaltoprofen for patients with diffuse-type and unresectable localized tenosynovial giant cell tumors: a study protocol

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders volume 20, Article number: 68 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

A tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a locally aggressive benign neoplasm arising from intra- or extra-articular tissue. Diffuse TGCT (D-TGCT) most commonly develops in the knee, followed by the hip, ankle, elbow, and shoulder. Surgical removal is the only effective treatment option for the patients. However, a local recurrence rate as high as 47% has been reported. Recently, we revealed that zaltoprofen, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug possessing the ability to activate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), can inhibit the proliferation of TGCT stromal cells via PPARγ. PPARγ is a ligand-activated transcription factor that belongs to the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily. It plays an important role in the differentiation of adipocytes from precursor cells and exhibits antitumorigenic effects on certain malignancies. Therefore, we are conducting this investigator-initiated clinical trial to evaluate whether zaltoprofen is safe and effective for patients with D-TGCT or unresectable localized TGCT (L-TGCT).

Methods

This study is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of zaltoprofen for patients with D-TGCT or L-TGCT. For the treatment group, zaltoprofen 480 mg/day will be administered for 48 weeks; the placebo group will receive similar dosages without zaltoprofen. Twenty participants in each group are needed in this trial (40 participants total). The primary outcome is the progression-free rate at 48 weeks after treatment administration. “Progression” is defined as any serious events (1. Repetitive joint swelling due to hemorrhage, 2. Joint range of motion limitation, 3. Invasion of adjacent cartilage or bone, 4. Severe joint space narrowing, 5. Increase in tumor size) requiring surgical interventions. We hypothesize that the zaltoprofen group will have a higher progression-free rate compared to that of the placebo group at 48 weeks.

Discussion

This is the first study to evaluate the efficacy of zaltoprofen in patients with D-TGCT or unresectable L-TGCT. We believe that the results of this trial will validate a novel treatment option, zaltoprofen, to stabilize disease progression for TGCT patients.

Trial registration

University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000025901) registered on 4/01/2017.

Peer Review reports

Background

A tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a locally aggressive benign neoplasm arising from intra- or extra-articular tissue. A localized extra-articular TGCT, also known as a giant cell tumor of the tendon sheath, commonly emerges from the smaller joints including the hand and ankle/foot. It is slight more predominant in women than in men [1] and an annual incidence has been reported as approximately one in 50,000 [2]. Diffuse TGCT (D-TGCT), is a synonymous with pigmented villonodular synovitis, grows in the large joint such as the knee, hip, ankle, elbow, and shoulder. and the recurrence rete is high despite the surgical removal. An incidence of it has been reported as approximately two cases per million annually with mostly younger than 40 years and a slight female predominance [3]. Surgical removal (open or arthroscopic synovectomy) is the only effective treatment, but the local recurrence rate has been reported to be 16 to 47% [4, 5]. It has been reported that TGCT growth is driven by overexpression of colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF1) as a result of fusion of the CSF1 gene to the collagen type VI α3 (COL6A3) promoter in the t(1;2) translocation [6]. Therefore, systemic therapies targeting the CSF1/CSF1R axis have been tested in patients with locally advanced or relapsed D-TGCT [7].

Recently, we reported the case of a giant cell tumor of bone arising in the right distal femur, which demonstrated adipocyte lineage, strong expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), and complete necrosis after taking zaltoprofen, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) for four weeks before biopsy [8]. PPARγ is a key transcriptional factor stimulates the adipocyte differentiation [9]. It also has the ability of antitumor activity by inhibiting tumor proliferation and invasion and through the induction of differentiation and apoptosis. PPARγ ligands including synthetic ligands such as thiazolidinedione (TZD) [10] and 15-deoxy-delta-12,14-prostaglandin J2 (15d-PGJ2) [11] have been investigated. Certain of NSAIDs, including indomethacin, play the role as direct ligands for PPARγ [12]. Zaltoprofen has been reported to induce apoptosis in rheumatoid synovial cells via the activation of PPARγ [13]. In some types of cancer, including liposarcoma [14], as well as colon cancer [15], breast cancer [16], and prostate cancer [17], the targeted-therapy for PPARγ has been tried. The long-term safety of zaltoprofen in the patients with rheumatoid arthritis was reported [18]. Based on those approaches, we analyzed the antitumor effect of zaltoprofen on primary cultured cells from TGCT, and zaltoprofen was found to inhibit their cell proliferation via activation of PPARγ [19].

We conducted a pilot study of zaltoprofen treatment for diffuse-type TGCTs arising in knee and ankle joints. This study included ten patients (6 knees and 4 ankles). Oral zaltoprofen (240 mg) was given daily for 48 weeks or until the disease was deemed progressive. Eight patients maintained stable disease at 48 weeks and one patient showed progressive disease at 72 weeks. At their request, surgery was performed for 3 patients with ankle D-TGCT at 12, 24, and 48 weeks, although all of them maintained stable disease. Since the zaltoprofen was well-tolerated and maintained stable disease [20], it could be a treatment option in patients with TGCT.

Herein, we describe an investigator-initiated clinical trial protocol to evaluate the efficacy and safety of zaltoprofen for patients with D-TGCT or unresectable localized TGCT (L-TGCT).

Methods

Overall study design

This study is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter trial, was designed by the investigators, and was accepted by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA). The Center for Clinical Trials, Japan Medical Association (JMACCT) funded this trial (JMA-IIA00284). The trial network consisted of a lead site at Innovative Clinical Research Center, Kanazawa University (iCREK) (Kanazawa, Japan) and ten additional sites in Japan; Asahikawa Medical University Hospital; National Cancer Center Hospital; Fukui University Hospital; Nagoya City University Hospital; Nagoya University Hospital; Mie University Hospital; University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine; Osaka City University Hospital; Okayama University Hospital; and Kyusyu University Hospital. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of zaltoprofen for patients with D-TGCT or L-TGCT. For the treatment group, zaltoprofen 480 mg/day will be administered for 48 weeks. The overall follow-up schedule is shown in Table 1.1.

Table 1 Assessment and evaluation schedule of this study
Full size table

The primary outcome of this study is the progression-free rate at 48 weeks after treatment administration. “Progression” is defined as any serious event requiring surgical intervention (Fig. 1). We hypothesize that the zaltoprofen group will have a higher progression-free rate compared to that of the placebo group at 48 weeks.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Scheme of this study protocol. CT, computed tomography; ECG, electrocardiogram; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PET, positron emission tomography; XP, X-ray photograph; CTCAE, common terminology criteria for adverse events; CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease; FDG, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose; MSTS, Musculoskeletal Tumor Society

Full size image

We are conducting this trial in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Health Research Involving Human Subjects, and all other applicable Japanese laws and guidelines. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Kanazawa University Hospital and each participating hospital. This study is registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000025901).

Study participants

We are recruiting D-TGCT and L-TGCT patients from April 2017 until March 2020, or until the enrollments are completed. We are including patients who meet all of the inclusion criteria (Table 2) (Fig. 1), but are excluding those who possess any of the exclusion criteria (Table 3). We are obtaining written informed consent from all the trial participants. These consent forms were also approved by the IRB. Each participant must understand the contents of the consent form before one’s acceptance. Each form must be dated and signed by both the participant and trial investigators. We also inform the participants that their medical treatment will not be affected if they refuse to participate in this trial. The consent forms are stored at each institution. The participants can drop out of the trial at any time.

Table 2 Inclusion criteria
Full size table
Table 3 Exclusion criteria
Full size table

Randomization

We perform randomization at the time of trial registration (Fig. 1). One of the trial staff allocates participants to the two arms (1:1), one group receiving zaltoprofen and the other placebo. Randomization is performed by using a computer-generated random sequence with stratification for the size of tumor lesion and tumor location (i.e., knee or foot joints).

Intervention and placebo

For the treatment (intervention) group, we prescribe 2 oral tablets of zaltoprofen (80 mg per tablet), 3 times daily with approximately one cup of water (~ 150 mL). For the placebo group, we prescribe 2 oral placebo tablets, 3 times daily with the same volume of water (Fig. 1). For both groups, we also prescribe a gastric mucosal protective agent in regular dosage during the study period.

Outcomes

The primary outcome is the progression-free rate at 48 weeks after drug administration. Our definition of progression (exacerbation) is any serious event requiring surgical intervention. Exacerbation is indicated if a patient meets one of the following criteria:

  1. i).

    The joint circumference is increased by 2 cm or more with respect to the baseline (knee: 1 cm above patella; ankle joint: determined using the figure-eight method). If there is fluid accumulation, it is examined for the presence or absence of hematoma. An increase in joint circumference due simply to edema is not considered exacerbation.

  2. ii).

    The range of motion of the joint (i.e., active motion) is reduced by 20% or more with respect to the baseline (calculated by averaging three measurements with a goniometer).

  3. ( i) or ii)

    must be detected in 2 consecutive evaluation periods conducted every 4 weeks)

  4. iii)

    An invasion of 5 mm or more of bone / cartilage erosion or a new lesion of bone / cartilage erosion of 5 mm or more, compared with that of baseline, is detected by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

  5. iv)

    An X-ray in the standing position shows the disappearance of joint space.

  6. v)

    An increase in the target lesion by 20% or more is determined by the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST).

  7. ( iii), iv) or v)

    must be detected once in any evaluation period conducted every 12 weeks).

  8. vi)

    Any surgical intervention for the disease that is performed for a specific reason.

We also evaluate secondary outcomes as follows:

  1. a)

    Progression-free rate (24 weeks and 48 weeks): Percentage of cases of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and stable disease (SD, i.e., when CR and PR are unchanged for more than 4 weeks).

  2. b)

    Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) change by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose- positron emission tomography (FDG-PET).

  3. c)

    Evaluation of affected limb function (baseline, 24 weeks, and 48 weeks): The Japanese Orthopedic Association score and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score.

  4. d)

    Percentage of cases in which clinical benefit regarding pain, range of joint motion, and joint function compared with that of baseline is observed at 24 weeks and 48 weeks (judgment by investigators or clinical trial physicians).

  5. e)

    The types, incidence, and severity of adverse events and abnormal laboratory data (graded using common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) v4.0) will be assessed, evaluating the severity and relationship with the investigational drug (Fig. 1).

Safety assessment

The investigator of each institutions ensure that adequate medical care is provided to a subject for any adverse events, including clinically significant laboratory values, related to the trial. All serious adverse events (SAEs) will be reported immediately to IRB of their institution and to the PI. The unblinding is permissible in case of SAEs. The PI will report to the IRB at Kanazawa University and PMDA according to the international conference on harmonisation (ICH) guideline-E6 and E2A (https://www.ich.org/home.html). The PI also will ensure the SAEs to all investigator and institution. If necessary, the independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) will be established.

Follow-up schedule

The overall follow-up schedule in this trial is shown in Table 1. Follow-up visits are conducted at each institution. We expect that regular follow-up visits will be scheduled every 4 weeks (± 7 days) to check the patients’ vital signs and to perform physical examinations. We will also evaluate disease progression by diagnostic imaging every 12 weeks, using X-ray, CT/MRI, or PDG-PET as scheduled. Blood tests are scheduled to be performed at 4 weeks and every 12 weeks thereafter (at the same time as diagnostic imaging). We will evaluate the primary outcome (i.e., the progression-free rate) at 48 weeks (Fig. 1). Adverse events and concomitant medications will be recorded through the trial.

Sample size

We consider the progression-free rate at 48 weeks after treatment administration as the main outcome. We estimated the progression-free rates in the zaltoprofen (treatment) and placebo groups to be 80 and 30%, respectively. In the sample size calculation, we used the log-rank test to determine that 20 participants per group would be required for a 95% confidence interval and power of 90%. Thus, a total of 40 participants will be needed in this trial.

Statistical analysis

The outcomes between the zaltoprofen treatment group and placebo group will be compared. Baseline characteristics will be described by means and standard deviations, or medians and quantiles (for continuous variables), and proportions (for categorical variables). The primary outcome will be analyzed based on the full analysis set (excluding participants who violate inclusion/exclusion criteria or do not take the study drugs), and will be compared between the groups at 48 weeks using the log-rank test. The secondary outcomes will also be compared between the groups at 24 and 48 weeks using t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, or Fisher’s exact tests. P-values less than 0.05 will be considered significant.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first evaluation of the efficacy of zaltoprofen for patients with diffuse-type and unresectable localized TGCT by a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind phase II investigator-initiated study.

TGCT progresses slowly [21]. However, it causes local destruction with invasion of the adjacent joint cartilage [22], and more severe symptoms such as joint pain, limited range of motion, swelling, erythema, and hemorrhagic effusion [23]. Excision by arthroscopic or open synovectomy is recommended, but complete removal is sometimes difficult to achieve due to the wide spread of the growth, resulting in high local recurrence [4, 5]. In addition, total joint replacement is necessary in the case of severe joint destruction due to tumor progression [24].

Based on our pilot study [20], we hypothesized that zaltoprofen treatment would produce a higher progression-free rate than that of placebo at 48 weeks. Moreover, we considered that the benefit of zaltoprofen is to avoid serious events, such as repetitive hemorrhage effusion, limitation of range of motion, adjacent joint cartilage destruction, and tumor enlargement, which require surgical interventions. Therefore, we defined the criteria of exacerbation in each serious event: 1) An increase in joint circumference by 2 cm or more with respect to the baseline measurement by hematoma is used to reflect repetitive hemorrhage in the joint, which risks joint cartilage destruction by inflammation [25]. 2) A reduced range of motion of the joint (i.e., active motion) by 20% or more with respect to the baseline value is used because the limited range of motion represents joint destruction and 20% reduction is the worst Ogilvie-Harris score [26]. 3) An invasion of 5 mm or more of bone / cartilage erosion or new lesions of bone /cartilage erosion of 5 mm or more compared with that of baseline by CT or MRI is used because bone invasion is responsible for joint destruction and MRI can detect 5 mm of invaded tumor [27]. 4) The disappearance of joint space detected by X-ray photography in the standing position is used because severe joint space narrowing is the worst grade of the Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) grading system [28]. and 5) An increase in the target lesion size by 20% or more by RECIST is used because a ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of the target lesions is defined as progressive disease (PD) by the RECIST criteria [29].

We believe that the results of this trial can conclusively identify zaltoprofen as a novel treatment strategy to stabilize disease progression for patients with D-TGCT or unresectable L-TGCT. The recruiting of eligible patients has been ongoing since April, 2017.

Abbreviations

15d-PGJ2:

15-deoxy-delta-12,14-prostaglandin J2

COL6A3:

Collagen type VI α3

CR:

Complete response

CSF1:

Colony-stimulating factor 1

CT:

Computed tomography

CTCAE:

Common terminology criteria for adverse events

D-TGCT:

Diffuse tenosynovial giant cell tumor

FDG-PET:

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose- positron emission tomography

ICH:

International conference on harmonisation

IRB:

Institutional Review Board

JMACCT:

The Center for Clinical Trials, Japan Medical Association

KL grading:

Kellgren and Lawrence grading

L-TGCT:

Localized tenosynovial giant cell tumor

MHLW:

Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

MSTS:

Musculoskeletal Tumor Society

PD:

Progressive disease

PMDA:

Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency

PPARγ:

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma

PR:

Partial response

RECIST:

Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors

SAEs:

Serious adverse events

SD:

Stable disease

SUV:

Standardized uptake value

TGCT:

Tenosynovial giant cell tumor

TZD:

Thiazolidinedione

UMIN:

University Hospital Medical Information Network

USAR:

Suspected, unexpected, serious adverse reaction

References

  1. Jones FE, Soule EH, Coventry MB. Fibrous xanthoma of synovium (giant-cell tumor of tendon sheath, pigmented nodular synovitis). A study of one hundred and eighteen cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:76–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Monaghan H, Salter DM. Al-Nafussi a. Giant cell tumour of tendon sheath (localised nodular tenosynovitis): clinicopathological features of 71 cases. J Clin Pathol. 2001;54:404–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. de Saint Aubain Somerhausen N, van de Rijn M. Tenosynovial giant cell tumor, diffuse type. In: Fletcher C, Bridge J, Hogendoom P, Mertens F, editors. WHO classification of tumours of soft tissue and b; World Health Organization; International Agency for Research on Cancer. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2013. p. 102–3.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ma X, Shi G, Xia C, Liu H, He J, Jin W. Pigmented villonodular synovitis: a retrospective study of seventy five cases (eighty one joints). Int Orthop. 2013;37:1165–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sharma V, Cheng EY. Outcomes after excision of pigmented villonodular synovitis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2852–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. West RB, Rubin BP, Miller MA, Subramanian S, Kaygusuz G, Montgomery K, et al. A landscape effect in tenosynovial giant-cell tumor from activation of CSF1 expression by a translocation in a minority of tumor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:690–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brahmi M, Vinceneux A, Cassier PA. Current systemic treatment options for Tenosynovial Giant cell tumor/pigmented Villonodular synovitis: targeting the CSF1/CSF1R Axis. Curr Treat Options in Oncol. 2016;17:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Takeuchi A, Yamamoto N, Nishida H, Kimura H, Ikeda H, Tsuchiya H. Complete necrosis of a giant cell tumor with high expression of PPARγ: a case report. Anticancer Res. 2013;33:2169–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosen ED, Hsu CH, Wang X, Sakai S, Freeman MW, Gonzalez FJ, et al. C/EBPalpha induces adipogenesis through PPARgamma: a unified pathway. Genes Dev. 2002;16:22–6.

  10. Lehmann JM, Moore LB, Smith-Oliver TA, Wilkison WO, Willson TM, Kliewer SA. An antidiabetic thiazolidinedione is a high affinity ligand for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR gamma). J Biol Chem. 1995;270:12953–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Forman BM, Tontonoz P, Chen J, Brun RP, Spiegelman BM, Evans RM. 15-deoxy-Δ12,14-prostaglandin J2is a ligand for the adipocyte determination factor PPARγ. Cell. 1995;83:803–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lehmann J, Lenhard J. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors α and γ are activated by indomethacin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. J Biol. 1997;272:3406–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamazaki R, Kusunoki N, Matsuzaki T, Hashimoto S, Kawai S. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs induce apoptosis in association with activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma in rheumatoid synovial cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2002;302:18–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Demetri GD, Fletcher CD, Mueller E, Sarraf P, Naujoks R, Campbell N, et al. Induction of solid tumor differentiation by the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma ligand troglitazone in patients with liposarcoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:3951–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kulke MH, Demetri GD, Sharpless NE, Ryan DP, Shivdasani R, Clark JS, et al. A phase II study of troglitazone, an activator of the PPARgamma receptor, in patients with chemotherapy-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer J. 2002;8:395–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Burstein HJ, Demetri GD, Mueller E, Sarraf P, Spiegelman BM, Winer EP. Use of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma ligand troglitazone as treatment for refractory breast cancer: a phase II study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2003;79:391–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hisatake J-II, Ikezoe T, Carey M, Holden S, Tomoyasu S, Koeffler HPP. Down-regulation of prostate-specific antigen expression by ligands for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ in human prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2000;60:5494–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hatori M, Kokubun S. The long-term efficacy and tolerability of the new anti-inflammatory agent Zaltoprofen in rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Med Res Opin. 1998;14:79–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Takeuchi A, Yamamoto N, Shirai T, Nihida H, Hayashi K, Kimura H, et al. Effect of Zaltoprofen for pigmented Villonodular synovitis cells with PPARγ activation. In: Proceedings of AAOS meeting Las Vegas, NV; 2015. p. 144.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Takeuchi A, Yamamoto N, Hayashi K, Miwa S, Inatani H, Aoki Y, et al. Feasibility as novel treatment of Zaltoprofen for diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumor arising in knee and ankle joint: a pilot study. In: Proceedings of ISOLS meeting Kanazawa, Japan; 2017. p. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nassar WAM, Bassiony AA, HA E. Treatment of diffuse pigmented villonodular synovitis of the knee with combined surgical and radiosynovectomy. HSS J. 2009;5:19–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen K, Ren Q, Han XR, Zhang XN, Wei B, Bai XZ. Imatinib mesylate induces mitochondria-dependent apoptosis and inhibits invasion of human pigmented villonodular synovitis fibroblast-like synovial cells. Oncol Rep. 2016;35:197–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Aboulafia A, Kaplan L, Jelinek J, Benevenia J, Monson D. Neuropathy secondary to pigmented villonodular synovitis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;325:174–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hamlin BR, Duffy GP, Trousdale RT, Morrey BF. Total knee arthroplasty in patients who have pigmented villonodular synovitis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:76–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Roosendaal G, Vianen ME, Wenting MJ, van Rinsum AC, van den Berg HM, Lafeber FP, et al. Iron deposits and catabolic properties of synovial tissue from patients with haemophilia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:540–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ogilvie-Harris DJ, McLean J, Zarnett ME. Pigmented villonodular synovitis of the knee. The results of total arthroscopic synovectomy, partial, arthroscopic synovectomy, and arthroscopic local excision. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:119–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Schmidt GP, Reiser MF, Baur-Melnyk A. Whole-body imaging of the musculoskeletal system: the value of MR imaging. Skelet Radiol. 2007;36:1109–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957;16:494–502.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the help from the study coordinators and physicians at our institution; Masako Yamazaki, Mitsuyo Kusajima, Takashi Higuchi, Kensaku Abe, Yuta Taniguchi and Hirotaka Yonezawa.

Funding

This research is (partially) supported by the Project Promoting Clinical Trials for Development of New Drugs and Medical Devices (Japan Medical Association) from Japan Agency for Medical Research and development, AMED. This funding body does not support the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript. Nippon Chemiphar will provide study medication zaltoprofen and placebo.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 13-1 Takara-machi, Kanazawa, 920-8641, Japan

    Akihiko Takeuchi, Norio Yamamoto, Katsuhiro Hayashi, Kentaro Igarashi & Hiroyuki Tsuchiya

  2. Innovative Clinical Research Center (iCREK), Kanazawa University Hospital, 13-1 Takara-machi, Kanazawa, 920-8641, Japan

    Akihiro Nomura, Kenichi Yoshimura & Toshinori Murayama

  3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Asahikawa Medical University, 2-1E Midorigaoka, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, 078-8510, Japan

    Susumu Tandai

  4. Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan

    Akira Kawai

  5. Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation Medicine, Unit of Surgery, Division of Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui, 910-1104, Japan

    Akihiko Matsumine

  6. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1, Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan

    Shinji Miwa

  7. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan

    Yoshihiro Nishida

  8. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mie University School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan

    Tomoki Nakamura

  9. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajii-cho Hirokoji-agaru Kawaramachi-dori Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan

    Ryu Terauchi

  10. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-Machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan

    Manabu Hoshi

  11. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan

    Toshiyuki Kunisada

  12. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan

    Makoto Endo

Authors
  1. Akihiko Takeuchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Akihiro Nomura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Norio Yamamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Katsuhiro Hayashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kentaro Igarashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Susumu Tandai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Akira Kawai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Akihiko Matsumine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Shinji Miwa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Yoshihiro Nishida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Tomoki Nakamura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Ryu Terauchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Manabu Hoshi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Toshiyuki Kunisada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Makoto Endo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Kenichi Yoshimura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Toshinori Murayama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AT and HT conceived the study and led the drafting of the protocol. AT, AN, TM, and HT participated in the design of the study and KY was responsible for the design of the statistical analyses. HT is the principal investigator of this study. AT and AN wrote the paper. NY, KH, KI, ST, AK, AM, SM, YN, TN, RT, MH, TK, and ME provided the critical comments to design the study protocol and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors have reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroyuki Tsuchiya.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Ethics Committees of the Kanazawa University Hospital (9013), Asahikawa Medical University Hospital (29024), National Cancer Center Hospital (T4456), University of Fukui Hospital (2017008), Nagoya City University Hospital (31-17-0003), Nagoya University Hospital (29005), Mie University Hospital (F2913012), Kyoto Prefectural University Hospital (2017–011), Osaka City University Hospital (101952), Okayama University Hospital (290801) and Kyushu University Hospital (2017301) approved the study. This study complied with ethical standards outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Individual written consent will be obtained from each patient.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

HT has received research funding from Nippon Chemiphar. The funding did not play a role in the design of the study or in the writing of this manuscript. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takeuchi, A., Nomura, A., Yamamoto, N. et al. Randomized placebo-controlled double-blind phase II study of zaltoprofen for patients with diffuse-type and unresectable localized tenosynovial giant cell tumors: a study protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 20, 68 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2453-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2453-z

Keywords

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2474

Contact us