Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Technical advance
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

A new anatomic locking plate for the treatment of posterolateral tibial plateau fractures

Contributed equally
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders201819:319

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2216-2

  • Received: 21 March 2018
  • Accepted: 1 August 2018
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Posterolateral tibial plateau fractures have become more common, and their treatment is of great importance to knee function. Additionally, there is no available literature detailing specialized anatomic locking plate for tibial plateau fractures. Therefore, the aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of an innovative anatomic locking plate for treatment of posterolateral tibial plateau fractures.

Methods

Between March 2014 and January 2016, 12 patients with posterolateral tibial plateau fracture underwent surgery with the anatomic locking plate for the posterolateral tibial plateau via the posterolateral approach. Relevant operational data for clinical evaluation were collected.

Results

The mean follow-up time was 26 months, and the mean age was 35 years for 12 patients. The mean interval between the time of injury and the surgery was 6.1 days. Radiological fracture union was evident in all patients at 12 weeks. During surgery, the blood loss ranged from 100 to 300 mL, and the duration ranged from 55 to 90 min. The Tegner–Lysholm functional score ranged from 85 to 97 at the final follow-up. Moreover, the final Rasmussen functional score ranged from 25 to 29, and Rasmussen anatomical score ranged from 13 to 18.

Conclusions

The newly designed anatomic locking plate for the posterolateral tibial plateau provided adequate fixation along the posterolateral tibial plateau. It proved to be safe and effective in a small-sample-size population (12 patients) during a 12- to 34-month follow-up.

Keywords

  • Posterolateral tibial plateau fractures
  • Anatomic locking plate
  • Posterolateral approach

Background

Tibial plateau fractures are commonly encountered in clinical practice, whereas posterolateral tibial plateau fractures have rarely been reported in the past. However, posterolateral tibial plateau fractures have been reported in up to 7% of all tibial plateau fractures with increased high-energy trauma and use of computed tomography (CT) [13].

Good reduction and firm fixation are vital for treatment of posterolateral tibial plateau fractures. Many authors recommend surgical treatment to restore joint congruity and mechanical stability and further guarantee the best prognosis [4, 5]. However, the operative treatment of posterolateral tibial plateau fractures remains a challenge due to the fibular head and ligamentous structures that impede adequate exposure of the posterolateral joint surface. Although many approaches have been reported [4, 69] to achieve appropriate exposure, there is no general consensus.

Recent studies [79] on the treatment of posterolateral tibial plateau fractures have focused on surgical approaches. There is no literature to our knowledge about a specialized anatomic locking plate for posterolateral tibial plateau fractures. Surgeons usually have to choose buttress plate systems such as L-shaped plates and T-plates used in the fixation of distal radius. However, due to the irregular bony structure of the region, the plates often require contouring during surgery to fit the posterolateral tibial plateau, which may potentially lead to longer operative duration, higher blood loss, and decreased mechanical strength of the plate. Additionally, the proximal locking screws in these plates may not achieve the “raft” effect to support the articular surface of the posterolateral tibial plateau fracture. Therefore, details of an innovative anatomic locking plate for the posterolateral tibial plateau (Fig. 1) and the clinical outcomes were reported to evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of this innovative plate.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

The newly designed posterolateral anatomic locking plate which is specially used in posterolateral tibial plateau fracture. a, posterior view of the tibial plateau. b, lateral view of tibial plateau

Methods

General data

This retrospective study was conducted after obtaining the approval of the institutional review board. Between March 2014 and January 2016, 12 patients with a posterolateral tibial plateau fracture (ages 18–45 years) underwent surgery with the anatomic locking plate for the posterolateral tibial plateau. Patients with osteofascial compartment syndrome, open fracture, multiple trauma, pathologic fractures, autoimmune diseases, blood disorder, and surgical contraindications were excluded. All patients received anteroposterior and lateral radiographs and three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction images of the tibial plateau before surgery. Additionally, all patients were followed up either by clinic review or by telephone as required.

According to the CT reconstruction images, the main fragments were located in the posterior half of the lateral condyle and/or a fracture line impacted the posterior aspect of the lateral plateau. According to three-column classification [10], all cases were fractures of the posterolateral column. Preoperative management included distal bony traction and splint. After the soft tissue condition was stable, all the fractures were exposed and reduced via the posterolateral approach by the same surgeon (Yu).

Plate details

The anatomic locking plate for the posterolateral tibial plateau (Fig. 2) was designed according to the structure of the posterolateral tibial plateau in a Chinese population. It was oblique “T” shaped to fit the posterolateral structure of the tibial plateau with a low profile and beveled edges. The angle between the plate head and the waist was 136°. It had five 30° universal locking holes to ensure precise screw insertion in the head, which fixed the plate with the posterolateral side of the tibial plateau. Especially three proximal row screws paralleled with the plateau could buttress powerfully as a “raft effect.” Tiny holes in the top of the plate head were used in cases of a temporary fixation or comminuted fragment fixation by K-wire insertion and capsule sutures. When plate data was transefer into 3D computer-aided design (CAD) model, several patients’ knee CT data were also integrated with the CAD model, implant placement was simulated in silico to check for accuracy. When we obtained the plate patent, the plate was made by a qualified custom-made plate manufacture (WASTON Medical Appliance Co, Ltd., China). All structure was made of titanium. Finally, the plates obtained were completely consistent with our design in terms of their shape and distribution and the orientation of screws.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Schematic figureof The newly designed posterolateral anatomic locking plate. a, posterior view; b, anterior view; c, lateral view(1.head, 2.waist, 3.body, 4.K-wires hole, 5.locking screw hole, 6.sliding compression hole, 7.locking screw hole)

Surgical technique and rehabilitation

All operations were performed using spinal anesthesia or general anesthesia with the patients in the prone position, and the lower limb tourniquet was inflated.

A posterolateral incision was placed over the biceps femoris muscle. Attention must be paid to identify and dissect the peroneal nerve posterior of the biceps femoris muscle. Then gently retracted laterally for the nerve protection during the operation. Medially retracted the lateral head of the gastrocnemius with the origin of the soleus elevated from the proximal section of tibia. The popliteus tendon could be retracted proximally to allow for fracture site visualization. The soleus was then detached from dorsal fibula with carefulness. Thereafter, the exposed capsule was incised to allow for the visualization of the entire lateral aspects of tibial plateau, including the posterolateral corner.

Temporary fix the fracture fragments with multiple K-wires. After elevation, the defect was filled with artificial bone graft. Then, screw formation of the posterolateral anatomic locking plate was attempted. Three “raft” proximal row locking screws were inserted parallel with the plateau joint surface. The reduction quality and location of internal fixation were further identified by fluoroscopic guidance. The physical examination of the knee stability was routinely conducted to exclude ligament injury.

Mobilization of the knee joint was encouraged immediately after surgery, and discharge was agreed when 90° was achieved, usually 5–10 days postoperatively. The knee motion range, as well as muscle strengthening was increased after surgical incision healing. Patients were initially allowed no weight bearing for 12 weeks to avoid early loss of reduction. Depending on radiographic signs of healing, partial weight bearing was advised and advanced to full weight bearing as soon as the patients can tolerate.

Clinical evaluation was performed using the Tegner–Lysholm functional score, Rasmussen functional score [4], and Rasmussen anatomical score [4]. The Rasmussen functional score was used to evaluate knee function primarily with special attention paid to the single plane stability and rotation stability. The Rasmussen functional score is a specific outcome index for postoperative evaluation of tibial plateau fractures. It consists of five categories, including pain (6 points), walking capacity (6 points), extension (6 points), total range of motion (6 points), and stability (6 points). The total score is the sum of these five items, and the higher scores indicate the greater function. A score of 30 points is defined as normal, 27–30 as excellent, 20–26 as good, 10–19 as fair, and 6–10 as poor. The Rasmussen anatomical score consists of three categories, including depression (6 points), condylar widening (6 points), and angulation (6 points). A score of 18 points is defined as excellent, 12–17 as good, 6–11 as fair, and 0–5 as poor. Medical image data of one patient is shown in Fig. 3.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

One male patient with posterolateral tibial plateau fracture, 43y, caused by car-accident. a, b were preoperational anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of one posteroleteral tibial plateau fracture. c-h showed more fracture details by 3-D reconstruction of CT scan. i, j were anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the patient acquired after open reduction and internal fixation with the plate

Results

The average follow-up was 26 months (12–34 months). The average age of patients was 35 year-old (18–45 years). The general conditions of patients are listed in Table 1. The mean time from injury to surgery was 6.1 days (0–12 days). At 12 weeks, evidence of radiological fracture union was obtained in all patients (10–14 weeks).
Table 1

General conditions

Case Number

Age(y)

Sex

Cause

Follow-up(mo)

1

18

Male

Veh.Acc.

12

2

43

Male

Veh.Acc.

18

3

42

Female

Fall

32

4

38

Male

Fall

22

5

45

Male

Fall

20

6

41

Female

Veh.Acc

24

7

39

Male

Fall

34

8

35

Male

Fall

31

9

33

Male

Veh.Acc

28

10

36

Female

Fall

33

11

33

Male

Fall

27

12

31

Female

Struck

31

During surgery, time and blood loss were recorded. No case of ligament reparation was found in the study because all patients with knee instability were excluded. Nine patients obtained anatomic articular surface reduction as well as three obtained good reduction.

Tegner-Lysholm function score, Rasmussen functional score, and Rasmussen anatomic score of final follow-up were recorded (Table 2). Radiograph showed intra-articular reduction loss of 2 mm step-off in one case, which might be caused by weight-bearing too early. No knee instability or pain was found in all cases. The average knee motion arc was 137° (122°–153°).
Table 2

Clinical findings

Case Number

Blood loss (ml)

Operation duration (min)

Tegner–Lysholmscore

Rasmussen functional score

Rasmussen anatomical score

1

250

70

97

29

18

2

100

55

93

28

16

3

160

55

87

27

14

4

200

60

89

28

15

5

230

70

85

25

13

6

200

65

95

26

16

7

210

80

90

26

15

8

240

80

91

28

16

9

150

75

93

27

16

10

300

90

88

28

15

11

180

75

88

27

16

12

220

70

89

26

15

Incidence of CPN (Common Peroneal Nerve) injury was noted in none case. Lateral knee instability was seen in none case. No flexion contractures or extensor lag was seen. No deep vein thrombosis or graft site morbidity was seen at the follow-up. In addition, no case of incurred nonunion or internal fixation failure was reported. However, one patient had superficial wound infection that recovered after treatment with antibiotics and local dressing changes.

Discussion

Patients with untreated posterolateral tibial plateau fracture may suffer from chronic pain, knee instability, and loss of function, especially when climbing the stairs, which even leads to malunion that needs surgery or re-surgery. Thus, many surgeons have agreed that open reduction and internal fixation should be preferred over non-operative treatment [1, 2, 4, 5]. Multiple approaches have been described given the complexity of the posterolateral tibial plateau anatomy [2].

Lobenhoffer et al. [9] introduced a posterolateral approach with fibular osteotomy with better visualization. An anterolateral approach with partial or full fibula head removed was developed by Yu [4], which do great benefit for reduction and fixation in the treatment of posterolateral tibial plateau fractures. However, fibular osteotomies may injury the common peroneal nerve and decrease the stability of the lateral knee joint [11]. Frosch et al. [8] described a posterolateral approach with a lateral arthrotomy for visualizing the joint surface. Posterolateral approach was modified by Tao [7] with an L-shaped incision. Fibular osteotomy was not required in this approach and it protected the soft tissue well, showing encouraging clinical outcomes. The posterolateral approach without fibular osteotomy was chosen in the present study.

Although surgical approaches have been well discussed in previous studies [4, 79], operative fixation in treatment of posterolateral tibial plateau fractures has rarely been reported. No specialized plate is used for the treatment due to the irregular shape of the posterolateral tibial plateau. The most widely used system is the distal radius locking plate [1]. The plate usually has to be contoured during surgery to achieve satisfying fitness, which may damage the locking hole and affect the angle stability. Moreover, the plate cannot achieve the “raft” effect due the fact that the proximal locking screws are parallel to the joint surface. This may lead to a higher risk of reduction failure, further comprising outcomes.

Cho et al. [3] reported a novel technique of 2.7-mm rim plating in tibial plateau fractures to address these problems. Rim plates function as positional plates (named “Hugging plates”) rather than buttress plates. The rim plate maintains the posterolateral tibial fracture reduction with the collinear clamp used for a rigid maneuver reduction throughout the fixation procedure. This rim plating technique can be easily applied to isolated posterolateral fracture fragments. However, it is difficult to use in patients with posterolateral tibial comminution and posterolateral corner depression. Moreover,both anterior and posterior stripping to obtain an adequate operative field, together with less antiskid ability, limits its use.

The newly designed anatomic locking plate for the posterolateral tibial plateau, which is oblique “T” shaped, fits the posterolateral structure of the tibial plateau well enough that it reduces plate contouring during surgery, shortens operative duration, decreases blood loss, and potentially decreases plate failure. In our study, our new anatomic locking plate fit anatomically, requiring no additional manipulation. The beveled edges and low profile of the plate can reduce the risk of prominence, which always leads to secondary implant remove surgery. Further, the proximal row locking screws can achieve the “raft” effect, which provides firm strength holding the articular surface. The main limitation distally is the posterior tibial neurovascular bundle. It is difficult to safely achieve exposure beyond approximately 8–10 cm distal to the lateral joint line owing to vessel trifurcation that transverse the interosseous membrane and muscle mass medial to the fibula. However, the length of plate is appropriate to reach the distal border, …without damaging the neuromuscular bundle. Thus, distal tibial exposure is not necessarily required. According to the Rasmussen functional/anatomical score, all patients achieved “good” results. The plate was proven to be safe and effective in a small-sample-size population (12 patients) during a 12- to 34-month follow-up.

The limitations of the study were the relatively small sample size; hence, large-sample studies need to be conducted to prove the efficacy of the technique. In addition, further biomechanical studies are required to evaluate buttress performance, compression forces, and comparative features against traditional buttress line plates via the posterolateral approach.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the newly designed anatomic locking plate for the posterolateral tibial plateau was proven to be safe and effective in a small-sample-size population (12 patients) during a 12- to 34-month follow-up. The plate fit the irregular posterolateral tibial plateau well, without requiring additional contouring. Therefore, this new plate may be used as a favorable internal fixation choice for treatment of posterolateral plateau fractures.

Notes

Abbreviations

CPN: 

Common Peroneal Nerve

CT: 

Computed tomography

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We thank LetPub (www.letpub.com) for providing linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.

Funding

Research Grant for the Key Disciplines Group Construction Project of Pudong Health Bureau of Shanghai (Grant No. PWZxq2017–11), the Program for Medical Key Department of Shanghai (Grant No. ZK 2015B17), Program for Outstanding Leader of Shanghai (Grant No. 046), Health Science and Technology of Pudong Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning of Shanghai (Grant No. PW2015A-15).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

BY and DZ designed the plate and provided the data of patients. ZJ, RA, JZ and XJ analyzed the data. ZJ and RA wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Shanghai Pudong Hospital (Approval No.2016005). The study was conducted in compliance with the ethical principles originating in or derived from the Declaration of Helsinki and in compliance with Good Clinical Practice Guidelines. All patients provided signed informed consent.

Consent for publication

Written consent to publish the content of this report along with the accompanying images was obtained from all patients.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Pudong Hospital, Shanghai Fudan Univercity Pudong Medical Center, Shanghai, 201399, China
(2)
Department of Orthopedics, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China

References

  1. Bhattacharyya T, McCarty LP 3rd, Harris MB, Morrison SM, Wixted JJ, Vrahas MS, et al. The posterior shearing tibial plateau fracture: treatment and results via a posterior approach. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19:305–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Wang Y, Luo C, Hu C, Sun H, Zhan Y. An innovative intra-articular osteotomy in the treatment of posterolateral Tibial plateau fracture Malunion. The journal of knee surgery. 2016;Google Scholar
  3. Cho JW, Samal P, Jeon YS, Oh CW, Oh JK. Rim plating of posterolateral fracture fragments (PLFs) through a modified anterolateral approach in Tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30:e362–e68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Yu B, Han K, Zhan C, Zhang C, Ma H, Su J. Fibular head osteotomy: a new approach for the treatment of lateral or posterolateral tibial plateau fractures. Knee. 2010;17:313–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Waldrop JI, Macey TI, Trettin JC, Bourgeois WR, Hughston JC. Fractures of the posterolateral tibial plateau. Am J Sports Med. 1988;16:492–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hu SJ, Chang SM, Zhang YQ, Ma Z, Du SC, Zhang K. The anterolateral supra-fibular-head approach for plating posterolateral tibial plateau fractures: a novel surgical technique. Injury. 2016;47:502–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Tao J, Hang DH, Wang QG, Gao W, Zhu LB, Wu XF, et al. The posterolateral shearing tibial plateau fracture: treatment and results via a modified posterolateral approach. Knee. 2008;15:473–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Frosch KH, Balcarek P, Walde T, Sturmer KM. A new posterolateral approach without fibula osteotomy for the treatment of tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:515–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lobenhoffer P, Gerich T, Bertram T, Lattermann C, Pohlemann T, Tscheme H. Particular posteromedial and posterolateral approaches for the treatment of tibial head fractures. Unfallchirurg. 1997;100:957–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Luo CF, Sun H, Zhang B, Zeng BF. Three-column fixation for complex tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:683–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Pires RE, Giordano V, Wajnsztejn A, Oliveira Santana EJ, Pesantez R, Lee MA, et al. Complications and outcomes of the transfibular approach for posterolateral fractures of the tibial plateau. Injury. 2016;47:2320–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement