Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Triweekly administration of parathyroid hormone (1–34) accelerates bone healing in a rat refractory fracture model

  • Yohei Kumabe1,
  • Sang Yang Lee1, 2,
  • Takahiro Waki1,
  • Takashi Iwakura1,
  • Shunsuke Takahara1,
  • Michio Arakura1,
  • Yu Kuroiwa1,
  • Tomoaki Fukui1,
  • Tomoyuki Matsumoto1,
  • Takehiko Matsushita1,
  • Kotaro Nishida1,
  • Ryosuke Kuroda1 and
  • Takahiro Niikura1Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Musculoskeletal DisordersBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201718:545

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1917-2

Received: 1 July 2017

Accepted: 14 December 2017

Published: 21 December 2017

Abstract

Background

Some reports have shown that intermittent parathyroid hormone (PTH) (1–34) treatment for patients with delayed union or nonunion have led to successful healing. In this study, we investigated whether systemic intermittent administration of PTH (1–34) has a beneficial effect on bone healing in a rat refractory fracture model.

Methods

We created a refractory femoral fracture model in 32 rats with periosteal cauterization that leads to atrophic nonunion at 8 weeks after surgery. Half the rats received subcutaneous intermittent human PTH (1–34) injections at a dosage of 100 μg/kg, thrice a week for 8 weeks. The other half received the vehicle only. At 8 weeks after fracture, radiographic, histological and mechanical assessments were performed.

Results

Radiographic assessments showed that the union rate was significantly higher in the PTH group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The degree of fracture repair as scored using the Allen grading system in histological assessment was significantly greater in the PTH group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The ultimate stress and stiffness measurements were significantly greater in the PTH group than in the control group (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

We demonstrated that triweekly administration of PTH (1–34) increased union rate and accelerated bone healing in a rat refractory fracture model, suggesting that systemic administration of PTH (1–34) could become a novel and useful therapy for accelerating fracture healing in patients at high risk of delayed union or nonunion.

Keywords

Parathyroid hormone (1–34)TeriparatideFracture healingDelayed unionNonunion

Background

Approximately 5% of fractures are estimated to fail to heal and result in delayed union or nonunion [1]. Nonunion represents a challenge for the surgeon, the patient, and the healthcare system, creating a significant drain on a country’s resources and causing serious problems in a patient’s quality of life [2]. It has been reported that the estimated total cost of treatment for nonunion ranges between £7000 and £79,000 per person [3]. Treatment for nonunion usually requires multiple surgical procedures and prolonged hospitalization, with frequently unrewarding results. Therefore, the establishment of a therapeutic strategy for enhancing bone healing in cases of delayed union or nonunion, or in cases at high risk thereof is clinically warranted.

Parathyroid hormone (PTH) (1–34), also known as teriparatide, is a recombinant fragment of PTH that has an identical sequence to the biologically active region (the 34 N-terminal amino acids) of the full 84-amino acid PTH. The fundamental effect of PTH on bone is the enhancement of bone turnover through the stimulation of both osteoblast-mediated bone formation and osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. Intermittent exposure to PTH increases bone formation over resorption, thus causing an increase in net bone mass, while continuous infusion of PTH increases bone resorption over formation, thus causing a net loss of bone mass [4, 5]. Intermittent PTH therapy has been associated with the expansion of osteoblast and osteoprogenitor cell populations, with this expansion thought to be one of the major mechanisms through which PTH is able to favor bone formation [6]. Intermittent daily administration of PTH (1–34) has been proven to increase bone mineral density and decrease the risk of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in osteoporotic patients [7].

Growing evidence suggests that intermittent daily PTH treatment can enhance fracture healing in several animal models and in patients in clinical trials [817]. Andreassen et al. investigated the efficacy of intermittent PTH (1–34) therapy (60 or 200 μg/kg/day) in a rat tibial fracture model, demonstrating increased strength at a fracture site and callus quality in both dose groups [8]. In a clinical trial, Aspenberg et al. showed that PTH (1–34) at a dosage of 20 μg/day improved early callus formation and shortened the time to radiological healing in a randomized control trial in 102 postmenopausal women with a distal radius fracture that was treated non-operatively [12]. However, there have been some animal and clinical studies in which PTH (1–34) therapy was less effective. Bhandari et al. did not observe an effect of 20 μg/day PTH (1–34) for 6 months on consolidation of femoral neck fractures in 159 patients after 2 years [18]. Alkhiary et al. tested the efficacy of 5 and 30 μg/kg/day in a rat femoral fracture model [10]. Although biomechanical properties significantly increased in the high-dose group, the effect of low-dose treatment was similar to that of placebo on day 35.

Another important potential application for PTH (1–34) is in the setting of impaired fracture healing. Recently, some small case series and isolated case reports have shown that intermittent PTH (1–34) treatment for patients with delayed union or nonunion have led to successful healing, suggesting the drug could be effective as an adjuvant for impaired fracture healing [19]. However, to date, there have been no clinical trials on the use of PTH (1–34) to accelerate bone healing in delayed union and nonunion. In addition, limited data has described the role of PTH (1–34) on impaired fracture healing in experimental animals [16, 19].

Different frequencies of PTH (1–34) administration (e.g., daily versus weekly versus triweekly [20]) have been shown to have different effects on fracture healing and bone regeneration [20, 21]. Previous studies indicated that less frequent administration of PTH (1–34) might be a feasible protocol. Tsunori et al. compared the efficacy of once-daily (15 μg/kg), triweekly (35 μg/kg or 105 μg/kg), and once weekly (105 μg/kg) PTH (1–34) injections for bone regeneration in critical-size bone defects in the rat calvarium [20]. This study revealed that triweekly PTH (1–34) administration at a higher dose had the greatest effect on bone regeneration. However, no study has investigated the effect of less frequent intermittent administration of PTH (1–34) on refractory fractures or nonunion in experimental animals. In this study, we aimed to determine whether systemic triweekly administration of PTH (1–34) enhances bone healing in a rat refractory fracture model.

Methods

Animal model

Thirty-two twelve-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats (CLEA, Tokyo, Japan) weighing 392.5 ± 7.2 g were used in this study. We created a reproducible refractory femoral fracture model with periosteal cauterization in the rats, which leads to atrophic nonunion at 8 weeks after surgery [22]. Briefly, a 1.25-mm diameter K-wire was inserted into the right femoral intramedullary canal in a retrograde fashion and a closed transverse femoral shaft fracture was created in the right femur using a 3-point bending apparatus with a drop weight [23, 24]. In order to produce nonunion, the fractured site was exposed and the periosteum was cauterized circumferentially for 2-mm on each side of the fracture.

PTH treatment

Immediately after the procedure, half the rats (n = 16) received subcutaneous intermittent human PTH (1–34) (a generous gift from Asahi Kasei Pharma Corp., Tokyo, Japan) injections at a dosage of 100 μg/kg, thrice a week for 8 weeks (PTH group). The PTH was dissolved in saline with 0.1% rat serum albumin. The other half rats (n = 16) received the vehicle only (control group). At 8 weeks after fracture, all animals were euthanized by an overdose of pentobarbital sodium intraperitoneally for the following assessments.

Radiographic assessment of fracture repair

At week 8, radiographs of the fractured limb from anteroposterior and lateral views were taken. Each callus, on the four cortices (two from antero-posterior and two from lateral views), was evaluated by four orthopedic surgeons blinded to the group. A bony union was defined when three of the four cortices were bridged and/or fracture lines disappeared completely [25, 26]. Nonunion was defined if neither side of the callus was bridged in these views [26].

Micro-computed tomography (μ-CT) measurement

At week 8, the fractured femur was harvested and the intramedullary pins were removed from the bones. For quantification of callus formation, micro-computed tomography (μ-CT) imaging was performed on seven animals, which were randomly selected, in each group by using R_mCT2 FX (Rigaku Corp., Tokyo, Japan) [Additional file 1: Table S1]. After scanning, 3D reconstruction was performed using built-in software. The region of interest (ROI) was set at the area of callus healing and extended 3-mm proximally and distally to the fracture line, resulting in a ROI of 6-mm. The following parameters of the callus were calculated from the ROI using bone microstructure software (TRI/3D–BON-FCS64, Ratoc System Engineering, Tokyo, Japan): tissue mineral density (TMD), total callus volume (TV), callus bone mineral content (BMC), volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD = BMC/TV), and bone volume fraction (the ratio of bone volume (BV) to TV; BV/TV). Calibration of BMD was performed by scanning hydroxyapatite phantoms of known densities that were provided by the system manufacturer.

Histological assessment

At week 8, the fractured femur was harvested from six animals, which were randomly selected, in each group (Additional file 1: Table S1). The femur was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, decalcified, and embedded in paraffin wax. Sagittal sections were prepared and stained with Safranin-O/Fast Green. The Allen score, which utilizes a five-point scale (grades 0 through 4) for grading fracture healing, was evaluated by four orthopedic surgeons blinded to the group [27]. The grading scale for histological assessment of fracture healing is as follows: grade 0, nonunion; grade 1, incomplete cartilaginous union (fibrous elements); grade 2, complete cartilaginous union; grade 3, incomplete bony union (small amount of cartilage present in callus); and grade 4, complete bony union.

Mechanical assessment

At week 8, biomechanical assessment was performed on six animals, which were randomly selected, in each group [Additional file 1: Table S1]. Briefly, the fractured femur and the contralateral, intact femur were harvested and the intramedullary fixation pin was removed. A standardized 3-point bending test was performed with a load torsion and bending tester (MZ-500D, MZ-500S, Maruto Instrument Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) [28]. The bending force was applied with the crosshead at a speed of 2-mm/min until rupture occurred. The ultimate stress (in N), extrinsic stiffness (in N/mm), and failure energy (in N/mm) were assessed. For each parameter, the ratio of value in the fractured femur to that in the intact femur in the same animal was calculated.

Statistical analysis

All the quantitative data was presented as means ± standard deviations. Fisher’s exact test was used for the radiographic assessment of union and nonunion rates, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for data from μ-CT measurement, histological assessment, and mechanical assessment. A P-value of <0.05 was set as statistically significant.

Results

Union rate

Eleven (68.8%) rats in the PTH group achieved fracture union compared with only 5 (31.3%) rats in the control group (Fig. 1 and Table 1; P < 0.05). In the control group, nonunion was observed in 9 (56.3%) rats, whereas in the PTH group nonunion was observed in only 3 (18.8%) rats (P < 0.05).
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Radiographic evidence of fracture healing in the control group (upper panel) and the PTH group (lower panel) at week 8 after fracture. Representative radiographs including the fracture site (white arrow)

Table 1

Union and nonunion rate by radiographic assessment at week 8

 

Control

PTH (1–34)

Union

5/16 (31.3%)

11/16 (68.8%)*

Nonunion

9/16 (56.3%)

3/16 (18.8%)*

*p < 0.05 compared with the control group

μ-CT measurement

TMD of the callus was higher in the PTH group than in the control group (p < 0.05; 774.7 ± 56.5 vs 693.3 ± 41.8 mg/cm3; Table 2). vBMD of the callus was higher in the PTH group than in the control group (p < 0.05; 491.8 ± 75.4 vs 393.3 ± 35.6 mg/cm3). No significant difference in TV, BMC and BV/TV was observed between the PTH group and control group.
Table 2

Micro-computed tomography (μ-CT) measurement at week 8

Parameter

Control

PTH (1–34)

TMD (mg/cm3)

693.3 ± 41.8

774.7 ± 56.5*

TV (cm3)

0.2 ± 0.1

0.2 ± 0.0

BMC (mg)

87.5 ± 26.2

86.3 ± 19.6

vBMD (mg/cm3)

393.3 ± 35.6

491.8 ± 75.4*

BV/TV (%)

56.8 ± 5.1

63.2 ± 6.9

TMD tissue mineral density, TV total callus volume, BMC bone mineral content, vBMD volumetric bone mineral density (BMC/TV), BV bone volume, BV/TV bone volume fraction (the ratio of bone volume (BV) to TV)

*p < 0.05 compared with the control group

Histological assessment

Bridging at the fracture site by woven bone was observed at week 8 in the PTH group; this could hardly be found in the control group and the fracture site was filled with fibrous tissue (Fig. 2a). The Allen score in the PTH group was significantly greater than that in the control group (P < 0.05; 3.4 ± 0.5 vs 1.3 ± 1.6; Fig. 2b).
Figure 2
Fig. 2

a Representative histological sections stained with Safranin-O/Fast Green. Cb = cortical bone, wb = woven bone, and ft. = fibrous tissue. Bar = 500 μm. b The degree of fracture healing as indicated by the mean Allen score at week 8 (n = 6 in each group) (*p < 0.05 in the indicated group)

Mechanical assessment

The ultimate stress and stiffness measurements for the fractured femur (expressed as a percentage of value in the intact femur) were significantly greater in the PTH group than in the control group (P < 0.05; 107.5 ± 32.5% vs 57.5 ± 22.2%, P < 0.05, 86.6 ± 29.5% vs 31.5 ± 13.1%; respectively; Fig. 3a, b). There was no significant difference in failure energy between the two groups (151.6 ± 159.7% vs 52.0 ± 26.8%; Fig. 3c).
Figure 3
Fig. 3

Biomechanical assessment of a fractured femur as assessed by the 3-point bending test at week 8 (n = 6 in each group). Values were normalized relative to the contralateral, intact femur (*p < 0.05 in the indicated group; N. S., no significance, medians are represented as horizontal lines)

Discussion

The failure of a fracture to unite represents an important problem in clinical practice. Off-label clinical use of PTH (1–34) is becoming an increasingly used option in challenging fractures and delayed union or nonunion, with successful early case reports [19]. However, the anecdotal literature on the use of PTH in promoting bone healing is only able to suggest its efficacy. This is the first study to elucidate the effect of systemic triweekly PTH (1–34) administration on bone healing using a rat refractory fracture model. In the current study, the union rate at week 8 as assessed by radiographs, and TMD and vBMD of the callus at week 8 as assessed by μ-CT, were significantly higher in PTH group than in the control group. Histological assessment revealed acceleration of bone healing in PTH-treated rats. Finally, ultimate stress and stiffness were significantly greater in the PTH group. Collectively, these results indicated that triweekly administration of PTH (1–34) accelerated bone healing and decreased the incidence of nonunion in rats.

To date, there have been only three studies on the use of PTH in experimental nonunion or refractory fracture models [2931]. Lin et al. made a murine atrophic nonunion model by creating an open osteotomy in the midshaft femur, followed by distraction using a clip to maintain a fracture gap of 1.7-mm [30]. Mice were treated with daily injections of 30 μg/kg PTH (1–34) for 14 days. At week 6 after surgery, the PTH (1–34) treatment resulted in lower rates of nonunion measured both radiographically and histologically. In contrast, Tagil et al. did not find a beneficial effect from PTH (1–34) treatment in a rat refractory femoral fracture model [29]. They used a hypertrophic nonunion model that they generated by creating open osteotomies with circumferential periosteal stripping 15-mm proximally to and distally from the osteotomies. They then treated them with PTH (1–34) at a dose of 50 μg/kg, 5 days a week for 6 weeks. Although PTH (1–34) treatment produced significant increases in callus size and strength, it did not increase union rate at week 6 compared to the control group, which was assessed histologically and radiologically. In the study of Perez-Nunez et al., a model of atrophic nonunion with a 2-mm gap was created in a rat’s femur [31]. Rats were treated with PTH (1–84) at a dose of 30 μg/kg daily, 5 days a week for 12 weeks. There was no significant improvement, which was histologically and radiologically assessed, in bone healing at week 12 compared to the control group.

In our study, we used a rat refractory femoral fracture model, which had already been established by Kokubu et al. [22]. In our model, the periosteal was cauterized to simulate the periosteal disruption, which leads to atrophic nonunion at 8 weeks after fracture. This model simulates the altered biological and mechanical environment seen in high-energy fractures, in which there is often significant soft-tissue damage, including disruption of the periosteum. PTH (1–34) was administrated thrice a week at a dosage of 100 μg/kg. Using this model and treatment protocol, we were successfully able to achieve increased bony union rate, mineral density of callus, and strength. The discrepancy between previous studies and our results may be due to multiple factors, including differences in species, surgical technique, dosage, and administration schedules.

The dosing schedule of PTH (1–34) in the current study was set as thrice a week. Several studies have shown that PTH (1–34) administration three times a week significantly promoted bone healing [20, 32, 33]. Komatsubara et al. demonstrated that triweekly PTH (1–34) treatment accelerated the fracture healing process in a rat osteotomy model [32]. Consistent with the study, the present study revealed that administration of PTH (1–34) thrice a week enhanced bone healing in a rat refractory fracture model. In Japan, weekly administration of PTH (1–34) at a dosage of 56.5 μg is used to treat patients with osteoporosis. Nakamura et al. showed that a weekly subcutaneous injection of PTH (1–34) is effective at increasing BMD and reducing the risk of new vertebral fracture by 80% in older men and postmenopausal women [34]. Recently, some clinical case report suggested that weekly PTH (1–34) administration could be effective in promoting bone healing in delayed union or nonunion [35, 36]. Since the rate of bone turnover differs between humans and rats, a triweekly dosing frequency in rats was considered equivalent to a weekly dosing in humans [37]. Therefore, our findings indicate that a weekly injection of PTH (1–34) may have positive effects on bone healing in patients with delayed union or nonunion.

Several studies have identified potential mechanisms by which PTH (1–34) may enhance fracture healing [6, 15, 38]. PTH (1–34) may enhance fracture healing by two mechanisms: firstly by stimulating the differentiation of osteoblasts and secondly by promoting chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation and accelerating endochondral bone formation [9, 11, 39]. Nakajima et al. showed that PTH (1–34) promotes fracture healing by stimulating proliferation of osteoblastic progenitor cells, synthesis of bone matrix proteins, and osteoclastgenesis, thereby enhancing both callus formation and callus remodeling in a rat closed femoral fracture model [9]. Nakazawa et al. showed that PTH treatment increases the recruitment of mesenchymal cells into the chondrocyte lineage and proliferation of chondroprogenitor cells, resulting in the formation of a larger cartilaginous callus in the same fracture model [11]. Kakar et al. performed a comprehensive investigation of PTH (1–34) actions on endochondral bone formation using a mouse closed femoral fracture model [39]. In this study, PTH (1–34) mainly influenced the early phases of fracture healing through increased chondrogenic cell recruitment and accelerated chondrocyte maturation and mineralization, potentially through a mechanism that involved canonical Wnt signaling. Although the manner in which PTH (1–34) therapy affects the healing process in refractory fracture remains to be determined, it is possible that similar mechanisms may work.

The present study had some potential limitations. First, we did not explore the cellular mechanisms responsible for the results of PTH (1–34) therapy. PTH (1–34) promotes fracture healing by stimulating proliferation of osteoblastic progenitor cells, synthesis of bone matrix proteins, and osteoclastogenesis, thereby enhancing both callus formation and callus remodeling [9]. Thus, it would be of interest to assess osteoblasts and osteoclasts at the fracture site histologically, which may lead to understanding of the mechanism of enhanced bone healing in refractory fractured and nonunion with PTH (1–34) treatment. Secondly, the dosage of PTH (1–34) used in the study is much higher than the clinical dose (20 μg daily or 56.5 μg weekly) for human osteoporosis treatment. We chose the dose of 100 μg/kg based on our preliminary experiments and previous fracture-healing studies in rats that have shown beneficial effects [40]. The difference should be interpreted cautiously as rats and humans have important differences in skeletal and physiological properties and in their response to and metabolism of PTH (1–34) [10, 16]. However, a higher dose of PTH (1–34) than that for osteoporosis might be necessary to promote bone healing. Hence, the appropriate dosage and frequency for the treatment of nonunion needs to be defined in clinical studies because of difficulties in translating an animal dosage and frequency to human. These will be examined in future study.

Conclusions

Systemic triweekly administration of PTH (1–34) increased union rate and accelerated bone healing in a rat refractory femoral fracture model. These findings suggest that intermittent administration of PTH (1–34) may become a novel and useful therapy for accelerating fracture healing in patients at high risk of delayed union or nonunion.

Notes

Abbreviations

BMC: 

Callus bone mineral content

BV: 

Bone volume

PTH: 

Parathyroid hormone

ROI: 

Region of interest

TMD: 

Tissue mineral density

TV: 

Total callus volume

VBMD: 

Volumetric bone mineral density

μ-CT: 

Micro-computed tomography

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to give a special thanks to Ms. M. Yasuda, Ms. K. Tanaka, and Ms. M. Nagata (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine) for their excellent technical assistance. Human PTH (1-34) was kindly provided under a material transfer agreement with Asahi Kasei Pharma Corp. (Tokyo, Japan). The company had no role in the design, collection, analysis, or interpretation of data, the writing of the manuscript, or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Funding

No funding was obtained for this study.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

TW, ST, MA and YK2 performed surgery and radiological examination. TW performed histological and μ-CT examination. YK1 and SL analyzed all data, performed the statistical analysis and were major contributors in writing the manuscript. TI, TF, TM1, TM2, KN, RK and TN conceived of the study, and participated in its design and coordination. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval

All animal procedures were performed under the approval and guidance of the Animal Care and Use Committee of Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
(2)
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

References

  1. Zura R, Xiong Z, Einhorn T, Watson JT, Ostrum RF, Prayson MJ, et al. Epidemiology of fracture nonunion in 18 human bones. JAMA Surg. 2016;151:e162775.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Niikura T, Lee SY, Sakai Y, Nishida K, Kuroda R, Kurosaka M. Outcome of fixation for nonunion of extremities. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2014;22:309–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Mills L, Tsang J, Hopper G, Keenan G, Simpson AH. The multifactorial aetiology of fracture nonunion and the importance of searching for latent infection. Bone Joint Res. 2016;5:512–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Jilka RL. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of the anabolic effect of intermittent PTH. Bone. 2007;40:1434–46.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Uzawa T, Hori M, Ejiri S, Ozawa H. Comparison of the effects of intermittent and continuous administration of human parathyroid hormone(1-34) on rat bone. Bone. 1995;16:477–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ellegaard M, Jørgensen NR, Schwarz P. Parathyroid hormone and bone healing. Calcif Tissue Int. 2010;87:1–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Neer RM, Arnaud CD, Zanchetta JR, Prince R, Gaich GA, Reginster JY, et al. Effect of parathyroid hormone (1-34) on fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1434–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Andreassen TT, Ejersted C, Oxlund H. Intermittent parathyroid hormone (1-34) treatment increases callus formation and mechanical strength of healing rat fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 1999;14:960–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Nakajima A, Shimoji N, Shiomi K, Shimizu S, Moriya H, Einhorn TA, et al. Mechanisms for the enhancement of fracture healing in rats treated with intermittent low-dose human parathyroid hormone (1-34). J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17:2038–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Alkhiary YM, Gerstenfeld LC, Krall E, Westmore M, Sato M, Mitlak BH, et al. Enhancement of experimental fracture-healing by systemic administration of recombinant human parathyroid hormone (PTH 1-34). J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:731–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Nakazawa T, Nakajima A, Shiomi K, Moriya H, Einhorn TA, Yamazaki M. Effects of low-dose, intermittent treatment with recombinant human parathyroid hormone (1-34) on chondrogenesis in a model of experimental fracture healing. Bone. 2005;37:711–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Aspenberg P, Genant HK, Johansson T, Nino AJ, See K, Krohn K, et al. Teriparatide for acceleration of fracture repair in humans: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study of 102 postmenopausal women with distal radial fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25:404–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Iwata A, Kanayama M, Oha F, Hashimoto T, Iwasaki N. Effect of teriparatide (rh-PTH 1-34) versus bisphosphonate on the healing of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a retrospective comparative study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18:148.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Nauth A, Giannoudis PV, Einhorn TA, Hankenson KD, Friedlaender GE, Li R, et al. Growth factors: beyond bone morphogenetic proteins. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:543–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Peichl P, Holzer LA, Maier R, Holzer G. Parathyroid hormone 1-84 accelerates fracture-healing in pubic bones of elderly osteoporotic women. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:1583–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Takahata M, Awad HA, O'Keefe RJ, Bukata SV, Schwarz EM. Endogenous tissue engineering: PTH therapy for skeletal repair. Cell Tissue Res. 2012;347:545–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhang D, Potty A, Vyas P, Lane J. The role of recombinant PTH in human fracture healing: a systematic review. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28:57–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Bhandari M, Jin L, See K, Burge R, Gilchrist N, Witvrouw R, et al. Does teriparatide improve femoral neck fracture healing: results from a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474:1234–44.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Pietrogrande L, Raimondo E. Teriparatide in the treatment of non-unions: scientific and clinical evidences. Injury. 2013;44(Suppl 1):S54–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Tsunori K. Effects of parathyroid hormone dosage and schedule on bone regeneration. J Oral Sci. 2015;57:131–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Zhang W, Zhu J, Ma T, Liu C, Hai B, Du G, et al. Comparison of the effects of once-weekly and once-daily rhPTH (1-34) injections on promoting fracture healing in rodents. J Orthop Res. doi:10.1002/jor.23750. [Epub ahead of print]
  22. Kokubu T, Hak DJ, Hazelwood SJ, Reddi AH. Development of an atrophic nonunion model and comparison to a closed healing fracture in rat femur. J Orthop Res. 2003;21:503–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Bonnarens F, Einhorn TA. Production of a standard closed fracture in laboratory animal bone. J Orthop Res. 1984;2:97–101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Waki T, Lee SY, Niikura T, Iwakura T, Dogaki Y, Okumachi E, et al. Profiling microRNA expression during fracture healing. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17:83.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Litrenta J, Tornetta P III, Mehta S, Jones C, O'Toole RV, Bhandari M, et al. Determination of radiographic healing: an assessment of consistency using RUST and modified RUST in metaphyseal fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29:516–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Morse A, Yu NY, Peacock L, Mikulec K, Kramer I, Kneissel M, et al. Endochondral fracture healing with external fixation in the Sost knockout mouse results in earlier fibrocartilage callus removal and increased bone volume fraction and strength. Bone. 2015;71:155–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Allen HL, Wase A, Bear WT. Indomethacin and aspirin: effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents on the rate of fracture repair in the rat. Acta Orthop Scand. 1980;51:595–600.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Koga T, Niikura T, Lee SY, Okumachi E, Ueha T, Iwakura T, et al. Topical cutaneous CO2 application by means of a novel hydrogel accelerates fracture repair in rats. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:2077–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Tagil M, McDonald MM, Morse A, Peacock L, Mikulec K, Amanat N, et al. Intermittent PTH (1-34) does not increase union rates in open rat femoral fractures and exhibits attenuated anabolic effects compared to closed fractures. Bone. 2010;46:852–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lin EA, Liu CJ, Monroy A, Khurana S, Egol KA. Prevention of atrophic nonunion by the systemic administration of parathyroid hormone (PTH 1-34) in an experimental animal model. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26:719–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Perez Nunez MI, Ferreno Blanco D, Alfonso Fernandez A, Casado de Prado JA, Sanchez Crespo M, De la Red Gallego M, et al. Comparative study of the effect of PTH (1-84) and strontium ranelate in an experimental model of atrophic nonunion. Injury. 2015;46:2359–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Komatsubara S, Mori S, Mashiba T, Nonaka K, Seki A, Akiyama T, et al. Human parathyroid hormone (1-34) accelerates the fracture healing process of woven to lamellar bone replacement and new cortical shell formation in rat femora. Bone. 2005;36:678–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Tsuchie H, Miyakoshi N, Kasukawa Y, Aonuma H, Shimada Y. Intermittent administration of human parathyroid hormone before osteosynthesis stimulates cancellous bone union in ovariectomized rats. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2013;229:19–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Nakamura T, Sugimoto T, Nakano T, Kishimoto H, Ito M, Fukunaga M, et al. Randomized Teriparatide [human parathyroid hormone (PTH) 1-34] once-weekly efficacy research (TOWER) trial for examining the reduction in new vertebral fractures in subjects with primary osteoporosis and high fracture risk. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:3097–106.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Tachiiri H, Okuda Y, Yamasaki T, Kusakabe T. Weekly teriparatide administration for the treatment of delayed union: a report of two cases. Arch Osteoporos. 2014;9:179.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Mitani Y. Effective treatment of a steroid-induced femoral neck fracture nonunion with a once-weekly administration of teriparatide in a rheumatoid patient: a case report. Arch Osteoporos. 2013;8:131.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Takakura A, Takao-Kawabata R, Isogai Y, Kajiwara M, Murayama H, Ejiri S, et al. Differences in vertebral, tibial, and iliac cancellous bone metabolism in ovariectomized rats. J Bone Miner Metab. 2016;34:291–302.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Dogaki Y, Lee SY, Niikura T, Koga T, Okumachi E, Nishida K, et al. Effects of parathyroid hormone 1-34 on osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation of human fracture haematoma-derived cells in vitro. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016;10:E365–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kakar S, Einhorn TA, Vora S, Miara LJ, Hon G, Wigner NA, et al. Enhanced chondrogenesis and Wnt signaling in PTH-treated fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22:1903–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Nozaka K, Miyakoshi N, Kasukawa Y, Maekawa S, Noguchi H, Shimada Y. Intermittent administration of human parathyroid hormone enhances bone formation and union at the site of cancellous bone osteotomy in normal and ovariectomized rats. Bone. 2008;42:90–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement