Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Increased stiffness of median nerve in systemic sclerosis

BMC Musculoskeletal DisordersBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201718:434

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1793-9

Received: 22 March 2017

Accepted: 31 October 2017

Published: 7 November 2017

Abstract

Background

Systemic sclerosis can affect peripheral nerves, but the extent and the nature of this involvement are not well defined. The aim of this study is to compare the sonoelastrographic measurements of median nerves in systemic sclerosis (SSC), idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and healthy individuals.

Methods

The clinical, electrophysiological and ultrasonographic assessments were done. Patients with SSC and CTS were assessed with nerve conduction studies. The measurements of cross sectional areas (CSA) were performed at psiform and forearm level from axial US images. The elastic ratio is the ratio of strain distribution in two selected region of interests (ROI) done via comparing the median nerve to flexor digitorum superfcialis tendon. The ROIs were fixed to 2 mm.

Results

The study was completed with 47 hands of 24 patients with SSC, 53 hands of 27 patients with CTS and 38 hands of health controls. The CSA of CTS group was significantly higher than systemic sclerosis and control groups. The elastic ratio at psiform level and forearm levels of systemic sclerosis group were significantly higher than the CTS and control groups.

Conclusion

Median nerves lose the elasticity while the CSA’s are in the normal range in patients with SSC. These results suggested that the increased peripheral nerve involvement in SSC is about the increased stiffness of the nerves.

Keywords

Carpal tunnel syndromeMedian nerveSonoelastographySystemic sclerosis

Background

Systemic sclerosis (SSC) is an autoimmune disease of unknown etiology that causes thickening in the connective tissues [1]. The prognosis is mainly affected by the involvement of visceral organs. However, the involvement of the musculoskeletal system can take a major part in the disability caused by the disease [2]. SSC can affect peripheral nervous system, however, the importance and frequency of neurologic involvement in SSC has been debated. In a systematic review trigeminal neuropathy (16.5%), peripheral sensorimotor polyneuropathy (14.3%), and carpal tunnel syndrome (6.6%) were the most frequent forms of peripheral nervous system involvement in SSC [3].

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the entrapment of median nerve under the flexor retinaculum. [4]. It has been shown that median nerve conduction is affected in SSC, however surgical treatment does not improve symptoms in patients with SSC. It is suggested that compression of the nerve is not the main cause for symptoms [5] and whereas a peripheral nerve involvement can be due to the compression of single nerve fascicles by increased connective tissue of the endo- and perineurium or microangiopathy of the vasa nervorum [6, 7]. Moreover, electrophysiologic or sonographic changes can be seen in median nerve in patients with SSC, without the symptoms of CTS [8]. On the other hand, CTS is a clinical diagnosis, the electrodiagnostic studies are performed to solidify the diagnosis and to document the extent of involvement [9]. A timely diagnosis is warranted to prevent permanent nerve damage and functional loss [10].

Recently, ultrasonography investigation of the median nerve has also been used to visualize median nerve in carpal tunnel. In ultrasonography, an increase in median nerve cross-sectional area and decreased echogenicity due to neural edema within the carpal tunnel are typical findings [11]. Sonoelastography is another emerging technique that evaluates the elasticity of the tissues. It has previously been used to document decreased skin elasticity in patients with SSC [12]. It has also been recently used in the imaging of median nerve and shown to have a role in increasing the diagnostic accuracy of carpal tunnel syndrome via ultrasound [13]. Median nerve elasticity is affected by the presence of carpal tunnel syndrome but the reports about the stiffness of median nerve are conflicting [14, 15]. As a result, there are many questions about the involvement of median nerve in SSC, and how it differs from patients with carpal tunnel syndrome and healthy individuals.

Method

The major aims of this study were to detect the amount of clinical and electrophysiological peripheral neuropathies in patients with SSC and compare sonographic and elastographic findings of patients with SSC and CTS with healthy individuals defining the differences in elasticity in median nerve in these patients.

Patients and controls

The study was conducted between May 2014–May 2015. Patients with SSC were recruited from Rheumatology Outpatient Clinics and the patients with idiopathic CTS were recruited from Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Outpatient Clinic of Marmara University Hospital. The inclusion criteria of SSC were being 18–65 years old female diagnosed as SSC according to the American Collage of Rheumatology 2013 criteria [16]. The inclusion criteria of CTS were female patients between the ages of 18–65 years who have been diagnosed with CTS according to electrodiagnostic and clinical findings. The exclusion criteria were history of previous carpal tunnel surgery or injection or physical therapy in the last 3 months, and any etiologies pointing out a secondary facilitator for CTS like hypothyroidism, pregnancy and diabetes mellitus. Age-matched controls are also recruited from healthy volunteers without a history of any chronic musculoskeletal or rheumatologic disease and a previous history of carpal tunnel symptoms. All the participants have read and signed an informed consent.

All clinical evaluations were performed by the same physician (GO) with a standardized patient assessment form. Neurological examination and electrodiagnostic testing were performed by the second physician (OKC) with standard clinical assessment including muscle strength, sensory testing, knee and ankle stretch reflexes, Tinnel’s sign, Phalen’s test. The sonographic and elastosonographic measurements were performed a by third physician (IY) who was experienced in musculoskeletal ultrasound. These researchers were unaware of each other’s results. The results were collected and analyzed by another researcher (TO).

Nerve conduction studies

Patients with SSC have undergone a nerve conduction study (NCS) with polyneuropathy protocol which consisted of median and ulnar nerve sensory and motor NCS’s, tibial and peroneal nerve motor NCS’s and sural nerve sensory NCS. Patients with idiopathic CTS were assessed with CTS protocol that consisted of median and ulnar nerve sensory and motor NCS’s and comparative studies. NCS were performed with Medtronic-Keypoint (Denmark, 2007) device by the same physician. All studies were done under standard room temperature of 25 °C. Hand temperature was maintained at 32 °C or greater. The hand temperatures were assessed by device’s thermometer. Median, ulnar and tibial motor nerve proximal and distal latencies, motor nerve conduction velocities, compound muscle action potential amplitudes were measured. Median, ulnar and sural sensory NCS were recorded with standardized methods. For all sensory NCS, distal latency, sensory nerve action potential amplitude, and sensory nerve conduction velocity were recorded. Electrophysiological diagnosis of any neuropathy was obtained according to normative values of our laboratory and an abnormality was defined according to American Association Of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine.

Sonoelastography

Sonographic assessments of the median nerve were performed with Esaote Mylab 60 Ultrasound device (Geneva, Italy) and 6–18 Mhz linear transducer. Patients were seated facing the sonographer with forearm lying on the patient’s knee. The elbow was in flexion; the wrist in supination and the fingers were relaxed. The measurements of cross-sectional areas were performed at psiform and forearm level from axial US images. The measurements were obtained from inner of hyperechogenic rim of the median nerve. The measurements were performed and the mean values were recorded.

The sonoelastrography was performed with the same transducer and by the same sonographer. Twin view was used while B mod was on the left and the elastography view was at the right side of the screen. The median nerve was visualized in axial view and kept in center of the screen. The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve was recorded. The sonographer made seven to ten slight compressions periodically until the device determined that the proper elastographic view was obtained. It was important to do slight compressions in vertical plane and the screen was frozen at the decompression phase. According to the color box; green color represents the minimal and red color represents the maximal stiffness. The elastic ratio is the ratio of strain distribution in two selected region of interests (ROI). A round ROI was positioned in the center median nerve, while a same size of ROI was positioned in a homogeneously soft anatomical structure, which was considered as internal control. Second ROI was positioned on the flexor carpi radialis for the wrist level and flexor digitorum superficialis for the forearm level. The ROIs diameters were fixed to 2 mm. By using this method, a higher elastic ratio reflects a lower elasticity of median nerve (Fig. 1). The measurements have been repeated three times and the median value of these measurements were used in analyses.
Fig. 1

Sonoelastographic measurement of median nerve at forearm level

Statistical analyses

The data of the study was collected by TO and the statistical analyses were performed with Statistical Package for the Social Science Program (SPSS Version 10.0). The main characteristics of patients were evaluated with descriptive studies. Comparison of the mean values of NCS parameters was performed with ANOVA and categorical values were analyzed with chi-square tests. The correlation of sonographic, elastographic, electrophysiological and clinical data was performed with Pearson’s correlation test. P values lower than 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.

Results

Initially, 29 patients with SSC, 27 patients with CTS and 20 healthy controls were enrolled in the study. NCS’s could not be completed in five patients with SSC because of digital ulcers or severe contractures in hand joints. One patient in healthy subjects was excluded because of hereditary sensorimotor polyneuropathy according to NCS. Bifid median nerves were found unilaterally in one patient in SSC and CTS group. The study was completed with 47 hands of 24 patients with SSC, 53 hands of patients with CTS and 38 hands of health controls.

There were no significant differences between the groups according to age (×2:0.13, p = 0.13) and gender (F/M: 1.95; p = 0.15). For SSC group, disease duration mean was 5.7 ± 1,01 years. Modified Rodnan skin score mean was 11.5 ± 7.4. Raynaud phenomenon, renal crisis, and digital ulcers were present in 21, 1 and 12 patients respectively. Electrodiagnostic testing of SSC group resulted as 17 normal, 4 had carpal tunnel syndrome and 3 had polyneuropathy.

The CSA of CTS group was significantly higher than the control and SSC groups (p = 0.001 and p = 0.004 respectively). There was no significance between SSC and control group. The elastic ratio at psiform level and forearm levels of SSC group were significantly higher than the control and CTS groups (p = 0.001, P = 0,04 respectively). There was no statistical difference between CTS and control groups. The sonographic measurements of three groups are listed in Table 1.
Table 1

Analysis of sonographic and elastographic data

 

Group

Mean

Std. Deviation

ANOVA

 

Median nerve cross sectional area at psiform level

Control

9.13

2.18

F: 11.15 p = 0.001

Control/systemic sclerosis p = 0.325

Control/CTS p = 0.001

CTS/systemic sclerosis p = 0.004

Systemic sclerosis

10.27

3.36

CTS

12.64

4.61

Elastic ratio at psiform level

Control

1.63

1.15

F: 7.09 p = 0.001

Control/systemic sclerosis p = 0.001

Control/CTS p = 0.27

CTS/systemic sclerosis p = 0.04

Systemic sclerosis

3.02

2.56

CTS

2.19

0.93

Elastic ratio at forearm level

Control

1.77

1.21

F: 9.93 p = 0.001

Control/systemic sclerosis p = 0.001

Control/CTS p = 0.24

CTS/systemic sclerosis p = 0.008

Systemic sclerosis

3.21

1.81

CTS

2.29

1.39

In correlation analyses forearm elasticity of median nerve was inversely correlated with ulnar motor nerve conduction velocity (r:-0,474 p = 0,02), psiform level elasticity of median nerve was inversely correlated with median motor nerve distal latency (r:-0,436 p = 0,04) and ulnar motor nerve compound muscle action potential amplitude (r:-0,507 p = 0,01). There were no other correlations between nerve elasticity and other electrodiagnostic parameters. There was no correlation between modified Rodnan skin score and other parameters.

Discussion

The prevalence of peripheral neuropathy has not been well defined in patients with SSC. In a review about nervous system involvement in patients with SSC among total of 61 studies and case reports, 442 peripheral nerve system involvements have been found in total of 1628 patients. The overall reported prevalence for CTS was 6.56% and 14% for PNP [3]. In our study, the percent of patients who had electrodiagnostic CTS was 16% and polyneuropathy was % 12. These results suggested high rates of peripheral neuropathy in patients with SSC.

Previous studies that visualized the median nerve in SSC were not about the elasticity of the nerve. The median nerve area, diameter and flattening ratio were significantly affected in patients with SSC [8] and the ratio between the fascicular and non-fascicular structure of the median nerve was decreased [17]. This is the first study to actually document an increase in the stiffness of the median nerve in patients with SSC. In their study, Bandinelli et al. have concluded that the involvement of median nerve is not due to the pathologies involving the surrounding tissue but rather due to the compromised microvascularision of the median nerve itself [8]. Our study can be added to this hypothesis and claim that the involvement of the connective tissue of the nerve itself also plays a role in patients with SSC, suggesting a multisystem pathophysiology. We documented that the stiffness in SSC was even higher than patients with CTS. Despite stiffness was increased in patients with CTS there was no statistical significance between CTS and control group. There are contradictory results in about median nerve elasticity in CTS in the literature. One previous study shows a decrease in median nerve stiffness. That study was done in pregnant women, who usually have CTS due to edema around the median nerve, caused by an overall increase in body fluid content during pregnancy [15]. However, another study which included 41 CTS patients showed an increase in the stiffness of median nerve, which suggested the fibrosis and scarring in median nerve might have influenced this result that fibrosis and scarring are present in median nerve [14]. In CTS, it is thought that as the compression progresses, the edema and defects in microcirculation affect epineurium and can end up with fibrosis, therefore the stiffness is found to be increased in that study [4]. For our study, the CTS group included commonly mild to moderate cases. We thought that the stiffness can be increased in severe cases and a statistical significance could have been found if there were more severe CTS cases. In further studies, patient groups must be formed according to these pathophysiological properties.

In correlation analysis, we observed a statistical correlation between ulnar nerve conduction studies and nerve elasticity. These results suggested that the elasticity of median nerve decreased in patients with generalized peripheral nerve involvement. We did not test the ulnar nerve elasticity in the study but it is possible that there was also increased stiffness in ulnar nerve in patients with SSC. In addition to this median nerve latency increases with increased stiffness, showing that nerve conduction suffers when the elasticity of neural tissue decreases. No correlation between median nerve motor compound action potential amplitudes may indicate that myelin tissue suffers more than the axon itself, which also correlates with the hypothesis of connective tissue involvement. However, the clinical and demographic features did not correlate with stiffness. A previous study has also failed to show that clinical parameters of scleroderma like Rodnan score have an influence on median nerve [8]. The lack of any correlations between clinical parameters and median nerve involvement can be due to the limited number of patients that has been involved in these studies. Further studies need to be conducted to evaluate what affects median nerve elasticity in SSC, and if elasticity is involved in other peripheral neuropathies.

Conclusion

This the first study that demonstrates increased stiffness of median nerve in both wrist and forearm levels. The median nerve stiffness was also significantly higher than patients with CTS. Further studies with higher patient counts and also assessing elasticity of other nerves are needed.

Abbreviations

CSA: 

Cross-sectional area

CTS: 

Carpal tunnel syndrome

NCS: 

Nerve conduction study

ROI: 

Region of interest

SSC: 

Systemic sclerosis

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Author contributions

All clinical evaluations were performed by the same physician (GO) with a standardized patient assessment form. Neurological examination and electrodiagnostic testing were performed by the second physician (OKC) with standard clinical assessment including muscle strength, sensory testing, knee and ankle stretch reflexes, Tinnel’s sign, Phalen’s test. The sonographic and elastosonographic measurements were performed a by third physician (IY) who was experienced in musculoskeletal ultrasound. These researchers were unaware of each other’s results. The results were collected and analyzed by another researcher (TO). HD was involved in writing and editing this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This study did not receive any funding from any organization.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study has been approved by the Ethical Committee of Marmara University. All the subjects involved in the study gave their consent and signed and informed consent form.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Marmara University Hospital, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department
(2)
Kartal Research and Training Hospital, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department
(3)
Marmara University Hospital, Rheumatology Department

References

  1. Gilliland BC: Systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) and related disorders. Harrisons principles of internal medicine 2005, 16(2):1979.Google Scholar
  2. Boutry N, Hachulla É, Zanetti-Musielak C, Morel M, Demondion X, Cotten A. Imaging features of musculoskeletal involvement in systemic sclerosis. Eur Radiol. 2007;17(5):1172–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Amaral TN, Peres FA, Lapa AT, Marques-Neto JF, Appenzeller S. Neurologic involvement in scleroderma: a systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2013;43(3):335–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chammas M, Boretto J, Burmann LM, Ramos RM, Dos Santos Neto FC, Silva JB. Carpal tunnel syndrome - part I (anatomy, physiology, etiology and diagnosis). Rev Bras Ortop. 2014;49(5):429–36.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Mondelli M, Romano C, Della Porta P, Rossi A. Electrophysiological evidence of “nerve entrapment syndromes” and subclinical peripheral neuropathy in progressive systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). J Neurol. 1995;242(4):185–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Averbuch-Heller L, Steiner I, Abramsky O. Neurologic manifestations of progressive systemic sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 1992;49(12):1292–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Di Trapani G, Tulli A, La Cara A, Laurienzo P, Mazza S, David P. Peripheral neuropathy in course of progressive systemic sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol. 1986;72(2):103–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bandinelli F, Kaloudi O, Candelieri A, Conforti ML, Casale R, Cammarata S, Grassiri G, Miniati I, Melchiorre D, Matucci-Cerinic M. Early detection of median nerve syndrome at the carpal tunnel with high-resolution 18 MHz ultrasonography in systemic sclerosis patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2010;28(5 Suppl 62):S15–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Basiri K, Katirji B. Practical approach to electrodiagnosis of the carpal tunnel syndrome: a review. Adv Biomed Res. 2015;4:50.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Klauser AS, Faschingbauer R, Bauer T, Wick MC, Gabl M, Arora R, Cotten A, Martinoli C, Jaschke WR. Entrapment neuropathies II: carpal tunnel syndrome. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2010;14(5):487–500.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Choi SJ, Ahn JH, Ryu DS, Kang CH, Jung SM, Park MS, Shin DR. Ultrasonography for nerve compression syndromes of the upper extremity. Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea). 2015;34(4):275–91.Google Scholar
  12. Iagnocco A, Kaloudi O, Perella C, Bandinelli F, Riccieri V, Vasile M, Porta F, Valesini G, Matucci-Cerinic M. Ultrasound elastography assessment of skin involvement in systemic sclerosis: lights and shadows. J Rheumatol. 2010;37(8):1688–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Miyamoto H, Halpern EJ, Kastlunger M, Gabl M, Arora R, Bellmann-Weiler R, Feuchtner GM, Jaschke WR, Klauser AS. Carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnosis by means of median nerve elasticity--improved diagnostic accuracy of US with sonoelastography. Radiology. 2014;270(2):481–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Orman G, Ozben S, Huseyinoglu N, Duymus M, Orman KG. Ultrasound elastographic evaluation in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: initial findings. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39(7):1184–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ogur T, Yakut ZI, Teber MA, Alp F, Turan A, Tural A, Gelisen O. Ultrasound elastographic evaluation of the median nerve in pregnant women with carpal tunnel syndrome. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015;19(1):23–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, Johnson SR, Baron M, Tyndall A, Matucci-Cerinic M, Naden RP, Medsger TA Jr, Carreira PE, et al. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American college of rheumatology/European league against rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(11):1747–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Bignotti B, Ghio M, Panico N, Tagliafico G, Martinoli C, Tagliafico A. High-resolution ultrasound of peripheral nerves in systemic sclerosis: a pilot study of computer-aided quantitative assessment of nerve density. Skelet Radiol. 2015;44(12):1761–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement