Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Improved clinical outcome measures of knee pain and function with concurrent resolution of subchondral Bone Marrow Edema Lesion and joint effusion in an osteoarthritic patient following Pentosan Polysulphate Sodium treatment: a case report

  • Matthew J. Sampson1, 4,
  • Margie Kabbani2,
  • Ravi Krishnan3,
  • Michael Nganga2, 4,
  • Annika Theodoulou2, 4 and
  • Jeganath Krishnan2, 4Email author
BMC Musculoskeletal DisordersBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201718:396

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1754-3

Received: 13 April 2017

Accepted: 5 September 2017

Published: 12 September 2017

Abstract

Background

At present, there are no registered products for the treatment of subchondral Bone Marrow Edema Lesion (BML) and associated knee pain. Patients who do not respond to current anti-inflammatory therapies are left with limited treatment options, and may resort to operative management with Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). We report the use of Pentosan Polysulphate Sodium (PPS) for the treatment of BMLs of the knee.

Case presentation

We report the case of a 70-year-old female with knee osteoarthritis presenting with a high level of knee pain, scoring 8 on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), and functional limitation demonstrating a poor Lysholm Knee Score of 37. MRI scans of the knee revealed subchondral BML in the medial femoral condyle and medial tibial plateau. The patient was administered a course of Pentosan Polysulphate Sodium (PPS) intramuscularly twice weekly, for 3 weeks. MRI scans 2 weeks post-treatment showed complete resolution of the bone marrow edema at the medial femoral condyle and medial tibial plateau with concomitant recovery from pain (NRS pain score of 0), and a 43% improvement of the Lysholm Knee Score. In addition, marked reduction in joint effusion was also demonstrated in the MRI scan post PPS therapy.

Conclusion

The MRI interpretations demonstrate improved clinical outcome measures ensuing therapeutic intervention with PPS, and warranting further investigation into the efficacy of PPS in the treatment of BML associated pain and dysfunction in the osteoarthritic population via randomized controlled trial, or equivalent rigorous methodological technique.

Keywords

Bone marrow edema lesionMRIKnee osteoarthritisJoint effusion; Pentosan polysulphate sodium

Background

Bone Marrow Edema Lesions (BMLs) are changes that occur in the subchondral bone and are detected by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), depicting the severity of symptoms including pain [13] and cartilage degeneration [47] in osteoarthritic patients. BMLs are generally evaluated using fat-suppressed proton density or T2-weighted sequences. In fat suppressed T2-weighted and fat suppressed proton density weighted sequences, BMLs appear as hyper-intense areas in subchondral bone and in T1-weighted sequences they appear as hypo-intense signals [8]. The MRI signals related to the BML are thought to arise from an increase in concentration of blood and interstitial fluids (including infiltrating macrophages) in areas of trabecular microfractures and collapse within the bone marrow [8]. Improved spatial resolution and multiplanar reconstructions provide a potential role of 3D fast spin echo sequences, particularly for imaging of cartilage [9].

Increasing evidence supports the notion that BMLs play an important role in the pathogenesis of knee osteoarthritis, particularly in established disease where BMLs are associated with knee pain [2], radiological progression of knee osteoarthritis [10] and cartilage loss based on MRI [5, 11]. In regards to progressive osteoarthritis, data have suggested that BMLs are more likely to persist and enlarge in size with an associated increase in cartilage loss [5]. Furthermore, the severity of BMLs has shown to correlate with the increasing risk of knee arthroplasty [12]. The strong association of BMLs with pain and loss of cartilage has heightened pharmaceutical interest to target this structural lesion for monitoring progression of knee osteoarthritis and therapeutic effects [1315].

Pentosan Polysulphate Sodium (PPS) is a semi-synthetic drug manufactured from beech-wood hemicellulose by sulphate esterification of the xylopyranose hydroxyl groups [16]. PPS has been used in the treatment of horses with osteoarthritis, and demonstrated beneficial effects on the cartilage fibrillation and synovial fluid concentrations [17, 18]. In addition, further research into the anti-inflammatory properties of PPS have concluded (i) inhibition of the cartilage degrading enzymes which are upregulated post-acute injury [19]; (ii) inhibition of the nuclear translocation of NF-kappaB and the regulation of transcription of the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-alpha and interleukin IL-1 beta [20]; (iii) antithrombotic and antilipidemic effects which may assist with improved microvascular circulation in the subchondral bone [21] and considered to be mechanistically relevant in resolving BML. Furthermore, the safety profile of PPS has been further validated in two clinical trials in osteoarthritis patients [16, 22].

In this report we have observed the anti-inflammatory, disease modifying properties of PPS that potentially resulted in the rapid reduction of BML and joint effusion in an osteoarthritic patient.

Case presentation

A 70-year-old female with a history of osteoarthritis and arthroscopic partial medial meniscectomy presented with pain of the left knee and was on a waiting list for Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). The patient had failed to respond to intra-articular cortisol administration at the time of arthroscopy. The MRI scan of the knee, using a 3-Tesla proton density turbo spin echo fat saturated acquisition with TR 3000 ms TE 30 ms, demonstrated subchondral BML associated with focal full thickness chondral defects at the medial aspects of the weight bearing medial femoral condyle and medial tibial plateau (Fig. 1). The BML in the medial femoral condyle measured 11 × 7 × 12 mm (CC x transverse x AP) and the medial tibial plateau BML measured 8 × 8 × 8 mm (CC x transverse x AP). In addition, the axial proton density fat saturated imaging at the level of suprapatellar pouch revealed a knee effusion and a recurrent tear of the medial meniscus (body and posterior horn). Following patient consent, the pain assessment score was determined by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), an 11-point scale with endpoints of ‘a state of no pain (“0”)’ and ‘the worst pain imaginable (“10”)’ [23]. Functional capacity was assessed using the Lysholm knee score [24]. At pre-treatment, the NRS pain score was severe with a score of 8 out of 10 (Scale range: 0 to 10) and the Lysholm Knee Score was 37 out of 100, reflecting poor knee function indicated by problems in stair climbing and limping.
Fig. 1

Pre-treatment 3T proton density fat saturated images in coronal (a) and sagittal (b) planes demonstrating medial compartment bone edema, more pronounced on the tibial side. Axial (c) proton density fat saturated imaging at the level of suprapatellar pouch demonstrating a knee effusion. Corresponding post-treatment 3T proton density fat saturated images in coronal (d) and sagittal (e) planes demonstrating resolution of medial compartment bone edema. Axial (f) proton density fat saturated imaging at the level of suprapatellar pouch demonstrating reduction in size of knee effusion

As PPS is a weak anticoagulant with 1/15 the activity of heparin, the patient was monitored for safety by assessments of complete blood count, Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT), prothrombin time, liver function tests, renal function tests and serum calcium prior to commencement of treatment and periodically during treatment with PPS. The clinical status of the patient was checked regularly throughout the course of the treatment and follow up period.

After evaluation, the patient was considered suitable for PPS treatment. Since the injectable form of PPS is not a registered product in Australia for the treatment of BMLs, approval to use PPS as treatment for the patient was acquired from the Department of Health - Therapeutic Goods Administration, Australian Government under the Special Access Scheme. The patient was administered 2 mg/kg of PPS twice weekly with a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 4 days between dosages. Six intramuscular injections were administered into the gluteus maximus muscle over a 3-week period (2 injections per week). During the course of PPS treatment the patient abstained from NSAIDs and did not receive any additional therapy. Three follow-up appointments were made at 10, 24 and 38 days post-completion of injection regimen. Five weeks after the first PPS injection, MRI scans were performed using a 3-Tesla proton density fat saturated SPACE acquisition with TR 1200 ms TE 28 ms which demonstrated complete resolution of the BMLs at the medial femoral condyle and medial tibial plateau. In addition, the axial imaging at the level of the suprapatellar pouch demonstrated reduction in the size of the knee effusion. The patient displayed a marked functional improvement of 43% in the Lysholm Knee score at 4 weeks after the last injection, reporting a score of 65. Similarly, a robust recovery of pain was demonstrated, with the patient reporting a pain score of 0 on the NRS. During the PPS treatment and follow-up period, the patient did not present with any drug-related or nondrug-related adverse responses.

Discussion

The MRI findings performed using a 3-Tesla proton density fat saturated SPACE acquisition with TR 1200 ms TE 28 ms demonstrated that a course of intramuscular PPS produced complete resolution of the BML at the medial femoral condyle and medial tibial plateau. In addition, the axial imaging at the level of the suprapatellar pouch demonstrated reduction in the size of the knee effusion. The effects of PPS may be attributed to the multiple pharmaceutical actions related to its anti-inflammatory effects on IL-1 beta and TNF-alpha [20]. In addition, its inhibition of extracellular matrix degrading enzymes such as ADAMTS and MMPs [19] and improvement of microcirculation may have assisted in the reduction of cellular infiltration and minimization of the intra-osseous pressure in the bone marrow with alleviation of pain [21]. Extensive supportive data on the anti-inflammatory effects of PPS have been reported in animal and veterinary studies showing beneficial effects on the cartilage fibrillation and synovial fluid concentrations in dogs and osteoarthritic horses [17, 18]. Furthermore, a low incidence of side effects was observed in the treatment of dogs with osteoarthritis and significant reduction in cartilage degradation [25]. PPS efficacy was also shown in rat models of arthritis with the rodents showing reduced joint swelling and inflammation [26]. In support of improved microcirculation, PPS administration in rabbit and canine models exhibited increased blood flow through subchondral capillaries of osteoarthritis joints and bone cell nutrition [26].

The patient did not report any adverse effects due to PPS administration which supports the safety profile of this agent as reported in previous clinical trials [17, 22] conducted in osteoarthritic subjects. However, the new finding in this case report not previously reported were the effects of PPS on the MRI diagnostic features of subchondral BML and joint effusions. Moreover, the observed improvement in knee function in this patient may be ascribed to the chondro-protective effects of PPS [21, 22].

Current treatment options for BML associated osteoarthritis are diverse with limited reports of improved clinical outcome. The standard treatment of BML in osteoarthritic patients consists of analgesic or anti-inflammatory medications combined with reduced weight-bearing and physical therapy until symptoms reduce or resolve [27]. However, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and corticosteroids have been found to have negative effects on bone healing and the metabolism of cartilage [2831]. As reviewed by O’Mahony [30] the risk of fracture, both traumatic and spontaneous, is increased in those subjects that take continuous corticosteroid therapy. Therefore, PPS may be a suitable pharmaceutical option to NSAIDs and corticosteroids with potential disease modifying activity. Treatment by PPS in this report demonstrated complete reduction in BML, with no post-treatment adverse events reported on follow-up with the patient.

It should be noted that different MRI sequences were used pre- and post-treatment. This occurred as the patient’s initial scan (a 2D proton density study) was an extensive diagnostic scan looking at all structures, whereas the follow-up scan (a 3D proton density SPACE study) was a more limited study specifically utilized for assessing BMLs in an efficient manner. Although there is a paucity in the literature comparing sensitivities of the two sequences in relation to BMLs and effusions, the SPACE sequence enables acquisition of high resolution 3D datasets with contrasts similar to those obtained from 2D proton density imaging [32]. Given this, it is highly unlikely the use of slightly different MRI sequences in the pre- and post-treatment MRI studies would have biased the result.

Conclusion

Results from this case report implicate the potential effectiveness of PPS as a treatment option for osteoarthritic patients with BML and joint effusion. Given such findings, we recommend that future research seek to further investigate the efficacy of PPS in the treatment of BML associated pain and dysfunction in the osteoarthritic population via randomized controlled trial, or equivalent rigorous methodological techniques.

Abbreviations

BML: 

Bone Marrow Edema Lesion

MRI: 

Magnetic resonance imaging

MSAIDs: 

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

NRS: 

Numerical Rating Scale

PPS: 

Pentosan Polysulphate Sodium

TKA: 

Total Knee Arthroplasty

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The drug, Pentosan Polysulphate Sodium, was supplied by Paradigm BioPharmaceuticals Ltd.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors’ contributions

MJS analysed and interpreted the patient data regarding MRI findings. JK analysed and interpreted the patient’s condition, and patient data following treatment with PPS. MK administered and monitored the PSS treatment, as well as collected patient reported outcome measures. RK provided pharmaceutical and scientific background on PPS and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. MN and AT were contributors to the writing and preparation of the manuscript. All authors contributed to, read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The patient provided written, informed consent to receive PPS for the purpose of the knee condition through the Department of Health - Therapeutic Goods Administration, Australian Government Special Access Scheme.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent for publication of their clinical details and clinical images was obtained from the patient. A copy of the consent form is available for review by the Editor of this journal.

Competing interests

RK is an employee of Paradigm BioPharmaceuticals Ltd. which provided the Pentosan Polysulphate Sodium. The remaining authors (MJS, MK, MN, AT, JK) declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Benson Radiology
(2)
The International Musculoskeletal Research Institute Inc
(3)
Paradigm BioPharmaceuticals Ltd
(4)
College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University

References

  1. Davies-Tuck ML, Wluka AE, Wang Y, English DR, Giles GG, Cicuttini F. The natural history of bone marrow lesions in community-based adults with no clinical knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(6):904–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Felson DT, Chaisson CE, Hill CL, Totterman SM, Gale ME, Skinner KM, Kazis L, Gale DR. The association of bone marrow lesions with pain in knee osteoarthritis. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134(7):541–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Zhai G, Blizzard L, Srikanth V, Ding C, Cooley H, Cicuttini F, Jones G. Correlates of knee pain in older adults: Tasmanian older adult cohort study. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55(2):264–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Roemer FW, Guermazi A, Javaid MK, Lynch JA, Niu J, Zhang Y, Felson DT, Lewis CE, Torner J, Nevitt MC. Change in MRI-detected subchondral bone marrow lesions is associated with cartilage loss: the MOST study. A longitudinal multicentre study of knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(9):1461–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hunter DJ, Zhang Y, Niu J, Goggins J, Amin S, LaValley MP, Guermazi A, Genant H, Gale D, Felson DT. Increase in bone marrow lesions associated with cartilage loss: a longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study of knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(5):1529–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Wluka AE, Wang Y, Davies-Tuck M, English DR, Giles GG, Cicuttini FM. Bone marrow lesions predict progression of cartilage defects and loss of cartilage volume in healthy middle-aged adults without knee pain over 2 yrs. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008;47(9):1392–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Wluka AE, Hanna F, Davies-Tuck M, Wang Y, Bell RJ, Davis SR, Adams J, Cicuttini FM. Bone marrow lesions predict increase in knee cartilage defects and loss of cartilage volume in middle-aged women without knee pain over 2 years. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(6):850–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Starr AM, Wessely MA, Albastaki U, Pierre-Jerome C, Kettner NW. Bone marrow edema: pathophysiology, differential diagnosis, and imaging. Acta Radiol. 2008;49(7):771–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Altahawi FF, Blount KJ, Morley NP, Raithel E, Omar IM. Comparing an accelerated 3D fast spin-echo sequence (CS-SPACE) for knee 3-T magnetic resonance imaging with traditional 3D fast spin-echo (SPACE) and routine 2D sequences. Skelet Radiol. 2017;46(1):7–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Felson DT, McLaughlin S, Goggins J, LaValley MP, Gale ME, Totterman S, Li W, Hill C, Gale D. Bone marrow edema and its relation to progression of knee osteoarthritis. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(5 Pt 1):330–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Raynauld JP, Martel-Pelletier J, Berthiaume MJ, Abram F, Choquette D, Haraoui B, Beary JF, Cline GA, Meyer JM, Pelletier JP. Correlation between bone lesion changes and cartilage volume loss in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee as assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging over a 24-month period. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67(5):683–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Tanamas SK, Wluka AE, Pelletier JP, Pelletier JM, Abram F, Berry PA, Wang Y, Jones G, Cicuttini FM. Bone marrow lesions in people with knee osteoarthritis predict progression of disease and joint replacement: a longitudinal study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010;49(12):2413–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Lowitz T, Museyko O, Bousson V, Laouisset L, Kalender WA, Laredo JD, Engelke K. Bone marrow lesions identified by MRI in knee osteoarthritis are associated with locally increased bone mineral density measured by QCT. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2013;21(7):957–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Laslett LL, Dore DA, Quinn SJ, Boon P, Ryan E, Winzenberg TM, Jones G. Zoledronic acid reduces knee pain and bone marrow lesions over 1 year: a randomised controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71(8):1322–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Varenna M, Zucchi F, Failoni S, Becciolini A, Berruto M. Intravenous neridronate in the treatment of acute painful knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015;54(10):1826–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Kumagai K, Shirabe S, Miyata N, Murata M, Yamauchi A, Kataoka Y, Niwa M. Sodium pentosan polysulfate resulted in cartilage improvement in knee osteoarthritis--an open clinical trial. BMC Clin Pharmacol. 2010;10:7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Koenig TJ, Dart AJ, McIlwraith CW, Horadagoda N, Bell RJ, Perkins N, Dart C, Krockenberger M, Jeffcott LB, Little CB. Treatment of experimentally induced osteoarthritis in horses using an intravenous combination of sodium Pentosan Polysulfate, N-acetyl glucosamine, and sodium Hyaluronan. Vet Surg. 2014;43(5):612–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Simonaro CM, Tomatsu S, Sikora T, Kubaski F, Frohbergh M, Guevara JM, Wang RY, Vera M, Kang JL, Smith LJ, et al. Pentosan Polysulfate: oral versus subcutaneous injection in Mucopolysaccharidosis type I dogs. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0153136.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Troeberg L, Mulloy B, Ghosh P, Lee MH, Murphy G, Nagase H. Pentosan polysulfate increases affinity between ADAMTS-5 and TIMP-3 through formation of an electrostatically driven trimolecular complex. Biochem J. 2012;443(1):307–15.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Sunaga T, Oh N, Hosoya K, Takagi S, Okumura M. Inhibitory effects of pentosan polysulfate sodium on MAP-kinase pathway and NF-kappaB nuclear translocation in canine chondrocytes in vitro. J Vet Med Sci. 2012;74(6):707–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ghosh P, Cheras PA. Vascular mechanisms in osteoarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin. 2001;15(5):693–709.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Ghosh P, Edelman J, March L, Smith M. Effects of pentosan polysulfate in osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2005;66(6):552–71.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, Caraceni A, Hanks GW, Loge JH, Fainsinger R, Aass N, Kaasa S. Studies comparing numerical rating scales, verbal rating scales, and visual analogue scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2011;41(6):1073–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Briggs KK, Kocher MS, Rodkey WG, Steadman JR. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm knee score and Tegner activity scale for patients with Meniscal injury of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(4):698–705.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Henrotin Y, Sanchez C, Balligand M. Pharmaceutical and nutraceutical management of canine osteoarthritis: present and future perspectives. Vet J. 2005;170(1):113–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ghosh P. The pathobiology of osteoarthritis and the rationale for the use of pentosan polysulfate for its treatment. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1999;28(4):211–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mayerhoefer ME, Kramer J, Breitenseher MJ, Norden C, Vakil-Adli A, Hofmann S, Meizer R, Siedentop H, Landsiedl F, Aigner N: Short-term outcome of painful bone marrow oedema of the knee following oral treatment with iloprost or tramadol: results of an exploratory phase II study of 41 patients. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007;46(9):1460–5.Google Scholar
  28. Batemen D, Kennedy J. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and elderly patients. BMJ. 1995;310:817–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Brandt KD. Should nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs be used to treat osteoarthritis? Rheum Dis Clin N Am. 1993;19(1):29–44.Google Scholar
  30. O'Mahony D. Prevention of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis and fractures. J Clin Pharm Ther. 1999;24(2):83–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Miyata N, Kumagai K, Osaki M, Murata M, Tomita M, Hozumi A, Nozaki Y, Niwa M. Pentosan reduces osteonecrosis of femoral head in SHRSP. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2010;32(8):511–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Siemens Healthineers: SPACE. 2017. www.healthcare.siemens.com.au/magnetic-resonance-imaging/options-and-upgrades/clinical-applications/syngo-space. Accessed 02 Aug 2017.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement