Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Is raloxifene associated with lower risk of mortality in postmenopausal women with vertebral fractures after vertebroplasty?: a hospital-based analysis

  • Fu-Mei Su1,
  • Ying-Chou Chen1Email author,
  • Tien-Tsai Cheng1,
  • Wei-Che Lin2 and
  • Chun-Chung Lui2
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders201516:209

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0670-7

Received: 19 February 2015

Accepted: 10 August 2015

Published: 19 August 2015

Abstract

Background

Osteoporotic fractures are associated with mortality in postmenopausal woman. Whether raloxifen treatment after vertebroplasty can reduce mortality is unclear in this group. To compare the effect of raloxifene and no osteoporosis treatment on the risk of mortality after vertebroplasty, we designed this study.

Methods

This was a retrospective study (January 2001 to December 2007). Follow-up for each participant was calculated as the time from inclusion in the study to the time of death, or to December 31st, 2013, whichever occurred first. All of the patients underwent baseline bone density studies, and age and body mass index (kg/m2) were recorded. All associated medical diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, and liver and renal disease were recorded.

Results

One hundred and forty-nine patients with vertebral fractures were enrolled, of whom 51 used raloxifene and 98 patients did not receive any anti-osteoporotic therapy. At the end of the follow-up period, 62 patients had died and 87 were still alive. The treated patients had a lower mortality rate than those who did not receive treatment (P = 0.001, HR = 3.845, 95 % CI 1.884-7.845). The most common cause of mortality was sepsis, and those who received raloxifene had a lower rate of sepsis compared to those who did not receive treatment (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Effective treatment with raloxifene may had a lower mortality rate in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis-related vertebral fractures after vertebroplasty.

Background

Raloxifene is a selective estrogen-receptor modulator that has been shown to prevent bone loss. In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, treatment with raloxifene has been shown to decrease markers of bone turnover by 30 to 40 % after one year of usage, and increase bone density at several scanning sites by 2 to 3 % after three years of use [13]. Raloxifene has also been shown to decrease the incidence of vertebral fractures by 30 to 50 %, depending on dosage, but not the incidence of hip fractures or other non-vertebral fractures [1].

Osteoporotic fractures of the spine are common with aging, and the lifetime risk of a symptomatic vertebral compression fracture has been estimated to be 18 % for women and 11 % for men [4]. In addition, painful, clinically apparent vertebral fractures have been reported to increase overall mortality by up to 15 % [4, 5]. Furthermore, some individuals will become disabled by severe pain that lasts for longer than 2 to 3 months.

Data from studies on raloxifene used to reduce the risk of fractures can provide a way to test the hypothesis that treating osteoporosis reduces the risk of death. If treating osteoporosis does have a positive impact on mortality, there would be several important potential implications for managing skeletal health specifically, and for health care for women in general. Therefore, in this study, we investigated whether raloxifene treatment affects mortality rates in postmenopausal woman with vertebral fractures.

Methods

This was a retrospective review of osteoporosis patients with vertebral fractures. The Institutional Review Board of Kaohsiung Chang Gang Memorial Hospital approved this study, and it was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Conference on Harmonization of Good Clinical Practice Guidelines. According to Taiwan law, no additional informed consent was required, and patient information was anonymized and de-identified before data analysis.

The inclusion criteria were postmenopausal women with a radiological diagnosis of a vertebral fracture followed by a vertebral augmentation procedure for a painful vertebral compression fracture, and failure of conservative pain management. All patients were examined with magnetic resonance imaging, and we obtained the electronic medical records of all patients who underwent vertebral augmentation procedures. Patients were excluded if their fracture had a pathological source or had been caused by more than minimal trauma. We choose those with raloxifen treatment (60 mg/d after vertebroplasy) and those without treatment with any anti-osteoporotic therapy for comparison.

Follow-up for each participant was calculated as the time from inclusion in the study to the time of death, or to December 31st, 2013, whichever occurred first. All of the patients underwent baseline bone density studies, and age and body mass index (kg/m2) were recorded. All associated medical diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, and liver and renal disease were recorded.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software, version 21.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Kaplan-Meyer analysis with the log rank test was performed for different groups. Comparisons between independent means were analyzed using the independent t test, and relationships between categorical variables were evaluated by the chi-square test. Cox regression analysis was used to adjust for potential confounding factors. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

One hundred and forty-nine patients with vertebral fractures were enrolled in this study, of whom 51 used raloxifene and 98 did not receive anti-osteoporotic therapy. All were grade 3 by semiquantitative grading scale for vertebral fracture and T score < -2.5 with bone densitometry. The mean age at the index day was 74.24 ± 7.62 years in the raloxifene group and 72.52 ± 9.70 years in those who did not receive treatment. The mean follow-up period was 7.08 ± 3.67 years.

At the end of the follow-up period, 62 patients had died and 87 were still alive. The patients who received raloxifene survived for longer than those who did not receive treatment (P = 0.04). There were no significant differences in body mass index, number of vertebral fractural, previous hip fracture,or underlying diseases including diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, pulmonary disease, liver disease, or neurological diseases (Table 1).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the study patients

  

Raloxifene

No treatment

P value

Age (years)

 

74.24 ± 7.62

72.52 ± 9.70

0.238

Body mass index (kg/m2)

 

22.80 ± 4.82

24.12 ± 4.85

0.116

Survival years

 

8.06 ± 2.63

6.11 ± 4.33

0.004

Fracture no (spine)

 

1.83 ± 1.07

1.48 ± 1.48

0.158

Previous hip fracture

No

46(90.2 %)

88(89.8 %)

0.592

 

Yes

5(9.8 %)

10(10.2 %)

 

Diabetes

No

38(74.5 %)

73(74.5 %)

0.581

 

Yes

13(25.5 %)

25(25.5 %)

 

Hypertension

No

25(49.0 %)

46(46.9 %)

0.864

 

Yes

26(51.0 %)

52(53.1 %)

 

Neurological disease

No

50(98.0 %)

97(99.0 %)

1

 

Yes

1(2.0 %)

1(1.0 %)

 

Pulmonary disease

No

49(96.1 %)

92(93.9 %)

0.716

 

Yes

2(3.9 %)

6(6.1 %)

 

Cardiovascular disease

No

49(96.1 %)

93(94.9 %)

1

 

Yes

2(3.9 %)

5(5.1 %)

 

Liver disease

No

47(92.2 %)

91(92.9 %)

1

 

Yes

4(7.8 %)

7(7.1 %)

 
Raloxifene therapy had a significant effect on survival according to Kaplan-Meier curves (Fig. 1). After adjusting for potential confounding factors such as diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, pulmonary disease, liver disease and neurological diseases, the patients treated with raloxifene still had a lower mortality rate than those who did not receive treatment (P = 0.001, HR = 3.845, 95 % CI 1.884-7.845) (Table 2). The most common cause of mortality overall was sepsis, however the rate of sepsis was significantly lower in the raloxifene group compared to the no treatment group (P < 0.001) (Fig. 2).
Fig. 1

Kaplan-Meier survival curves for raloxifen therapy (dashed line) and no treatment (solid line)

Table 2

Effect of raloxifene on mortality after adjusting for variables

 

Regression coefficient

SE

P value

HR

Age (years)

.029

.018

.105

1.029

Body mass index (kg/m2)

-.032

.030

.289

.968

Diabetes

-.567

.294

.054

.567

Hypertension

-.159

.273

.560

.853

Neurological disease

.235

1.057

.824

1.265

Liver disease

-.554

.497

.265

.574

Cardiovascular disease

.676

.730

.355

1.966

Pulmonary disease

.214

.604

.723

1.239

Raloxifene use

1.347

.364

.000

3.845

Abbreviations: SE: standard error; HR: hazard ratio

Fig. 2

Comparison of the of the death between raloxifene and placebo group

Discussion

Raloxifene is a non-steroidal benzothiophene analog that has been shown to inhibit the growth of estrogen-receptor-dependent dimethylbenzanthracene-induced mammary tumors and reduce the occurrence of nitrosomethylurea-induced mammary tumors in rats. It is classified as a selective estrogen-receptor modulator on the basis of studies in which it prevented bone loss and lowered serum cholesterol concentrations without stimulating the endometrium [69].

Theoretically, effective prevention and treatment strategies can be implemented once a high-risk individual has been identified. It is essential that evidence-based recommendations be incorporated into clinical practice [10]. Despite the availability of effective treatment in the Taiwan health care system, effective osteoporosis interventions are not optimal for women with a history of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. This is consistent with a population-based study, in which only one in five patients with a fragility fracture received treatment for osteoporosis within the following year [11]. Other studies have also reported insufficient levels of treatment, with the probability of being treated being inversely related to age and lower among older women [1214].

Decisions regarding the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis should be based on the patient’s risk for fractures, drug efficacy and the side effects of these drugs. Individuals with a fragility vertebral fracture should always be treated when not contraindicated, because the risk of subsequent vertebral fractures is very high [15]. Based on the scientific evidence, raloxifene appears to be a good option.

Established osteoporosis has been associated with a high mortality rate after adjusting for age and comorbidities [16, 17], and prevalent vertebral deformities have been reported to predict increased mortality and fracture rates in both men and women [1823]. Treatment for osteoporosis with established methods for vertebral and non-vertebral fractures has been reported to reduce mortality in older, frailer individuals with osteoporosis who are at a high risk of fractures [2426].

In clinical practice, some patients with vertebral fractures do not receive medical therapy after vertebroplasty, and this may contribute to subsequent vertebral fractures and increased mortality [27]. Our results show that raloxifene therapy can reduce mortality, underscoring the importance of educating patients with osteoporosis about the value of raloxifene therapy. We also noted a decreased incidence of sepsis after raloxifene treatment compared to those who did not receive treatment.

It is not clear how raloxifene reduce risk of death due to infection [28]. Estrogen receptor ligands have been shown to reduce bacteremia and mortality in experimental models of infection [29]. Because vertebral fractures have been associated with increased pulmonary causes of mortality [30], so vertebral fracture might be associated with shallow respiration and increased risk of pneumonia and associated sepsis. So raloxifen reduces the risk of sepsis by decrease vertebral fracture.

A possible reason for this may be because raloxifene therapy decreases the frequency of subsequent fractures, thereby improving mobility and decreasing the infection rate.

There are several limitations to his study. First, the number of vertebral fractures was probably underestimated, given the inherent difficulty of diagnosing them. For instance, only about a third of cases of all vertebral deformities detected on radiographs receive medical attention, and less than 10 % require admission to hospital. Second, the sample size was small. Third, there was a lack of complete bone mineral density data after osteoporosis treatment. However, in this single-center cohort, we collected as much data as possible, and this study included only fragility fractures in patients older than 50 years without a secondary etiology. Thus, the patients’ fractures were due to osteoporosis.

This study also has a number of strengths. First, it was a long-term cohort study with a mean follow-up period of 7 years, which made it possible to gather sufficient follow-up data on survival. In addition, baseline magnetic resonance imaging scans were taken for each participant, all of whom had clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures. Thus, we were able to exclude other secondary causes of vertebral fractures such as cancer or pyogenic infections.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our results showed that raloxifene therapy can reduce the mortality rate of postmenopausal women with osteoporotic vertebral fractures. After adjusting for comorbidities, the patients who received raloxifene therapy still had a lower mortality rate. Thus, optimal management with raloxifene may reduce the risk of death.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital for providing the related data.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Rheumatology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine
(2)
Department of Radiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine

References

  1. Ettinger B, Black DM, Mitlak BH, Knickerbocker RK, Nickelsen T, Genant HK, et al. Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) Investigators. Jama. 1999;282(7):637–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Lufkin EG, Whitaker MD, Nickelsen T, Argueta R, Caplan RH, Knickerbocker RK, et al. Treatment of established postmenopausal osteoporosis with raloxifene: a randomized trial. J Bone Miner Res Off J Am Soc Bone Miner Res. 1998;13(11):1747–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Delmas PD, Bjarnason NH, Mitlak BH, Ravoux AC, Shah AS, Huster WJ, et al. Effects of raloxifene on bone mineral density, serum cholesterol concentrations, and uterine endometrium in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(23):1641–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, Jacobsen SJ, O'Fallon WM, Melton 3rd LJ. Population-based study of survival after osteoporotic fractures. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;137(9):1001–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hasserius R, Karlsson MK, Jonsson B, Redlund-Johnell I, Johnell O. Long-term morbidity and mortality after a clinically diagnosed vertebral fracture in the elderly--a 12- and 22-year follow-up of 257 patients. Calcif Tissue Int. 2005;76(4):235–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Turner CH, Sato M, Bryant HU. Raloxifene preserves bone strength and bone mass in ovariectomized rats. Endocrinology. 1994;135(5):2001–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Black LJ, Sato M, Rowley ER, Magee DE, Bekele A, Williams DC, et al. Raloxifene (LY139481 HCI) prevents bone loss and reduces serum cholesterol without causing uterine hypertrophy in ovariectomized rats. J Clin Invest. 1994;93(1):63–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Clemens JA, Bennett DR, Black LJ, Jones CD. Effects of a new antiestrogen, keoxifene (LY156758), on growth of carcinogen-induced mammary tumors and on LH and prolactin levels. Life Sci. 1983;32(25):2869–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Anzano MA, Peer CW, Smith JM, Mullen LT, Shrader MW, Logsdon DL, et al. Chemoprevention of mammary carcinogenesis in the rat: combined use of raloxifene and 9-cis-retinoic acid. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996;88(2):123–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown JP, Josse RG. clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne 2002. 2002;167(10 Suppl):S1–34.Google Scholar
  11. Siris ES, Miller PD, Barrett-Connor E, Faulkner KG, Wehren LE, Abbott TA, et al. Identification and fracture outcomes of undiagnosed low bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment. Jama. 2001;286(22):2815–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hajcsar EE, Hawker G, Bogoch ER. Investigation and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with fragility fractures. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne. 2000;163(7):819–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kamel HK, Hussain MS, Tariq S, Perry HM, Morley JE. Failure to diagnose and treat osteoporosis in elderly patients hospitalized with hip fracture. Am J Med. 2000;109(4):326–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Freedman KB, Kaplan FS, Bilker WB, Strom BL, Lowe RA. Treatment of osteoporosis: are physicians missing an opportunity? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82-A(8):1063–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lindsay R, Silverman SL, Cooper C, Hanley DA, Barton I, Broy SB, et al. Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. Jama. 2001;285(3):320–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Shiraki M, Kuroda T, Tanaka S. Established osteoporosis associated with high mortality after adjustment for age and co-mobidities in postmenopausal Japanese women. Intern Med. 2011;50(5):397–404.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ismail AA, O'Neill TW, Cooper C, Finn JD, Bhalla AK, Cannata JB, et al. Mortality associated with vertebral deformity in men and women: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS). Osteoporos Int. 1998;8(3):291–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hasserius R, Karlsson MK, Nilsson BE, Redlund-Johnell I, Johnell O. Prevalent vertebral deformities predict increased mortality and increased fracture rate in both men and women: a 10-year population-based study of 598 individuals from the Swedish cohort in the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporos Int. 2003;14(1):61–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Jalava T, Sarna S, Pylkkanen L, Mawer B, Kanis JA, Selby P, et al. Association between vertebral fracture and increased mortality in osteoporotic patients. J Bone Miner Res Off J Am Soc Bone Miner Res. 2003;18(7):1254–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Naves M, Diaz-Lopez JB, Gomez C, Rodriguez-Rebollar A, Rodriguez-Garcia M, Cannata-Andia JB. The effect of vertebral fracture as a risk factor for osteoporotic fracture and mortality in a Spanish population. Osteoporos Int. 2003;14(6):520–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Nguyen ND, Ahlborg HG, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV. Residual lifetime risk of fractures in women and men. J Bone Miner Res Off J Am Soc Bone Miner Res. 2007;22(6):781–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Puisto V, Rissanen H, Heliovaara M, Impivaara O, Jalanko T, Kroger H, et al. Vertebral fracture and cause-specific mortality: a prospective population study of 3,210 men and 3,730 women with 30 years of follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(12):2181–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Lau E, Ong K, Kurtz S, Schmier J, Edidin A. Mortality following the diagnosis of a vertebral compression fracture in the Medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(7):1479–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Bolland MJ, Grey AB, Gamble GD, Reid IR. Effect of osteoporosis treatment on mortality: a meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(3):1174–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Center JR, Bliuc D, Nguyen ND, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA. Osteoporosis medication and reduced mortality risk in elderly women and men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(4):1006–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Grey A, Bolland MJ. The effect of treatments for osteoporosis on mortality. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(1):1–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Huntjens KM, Kosar S, van Geel TA, Geusens PP, Willems P, Kessels A, et al. Risk of subsequent fracture and mortality within 5 years after a non-vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2010;21(12):2075–82.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Grady D, Cauley JA, Stock JL, Cox DA, Mitlak BH, Song J, et al. Effect of Raloxifene on all-cause mortality. Am J Med. 2010;123(5):469. e461-467.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Cristofaro PA, Opal SM, Palardy JE, Parejo NA, Jhung J, Keith Jr JC, et al. WAY-202196, a selective estrogen receptor-beta agonist, protects against death in experimental septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(8):2188–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kado DM, Browner WS, Palermo L, Nevitt MC, Genant HK, Cummings SR. Vertebral fractures and mortality in older women: a prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(11):1215–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Su et al. 2015

Advertisement