Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Treatment of pelvic fractures through a less invasive ilioinguinal approach combined with a minimally invasive posterior approach

  • Lei Zhu1,
  • Lu Wang2,
  • Di Shen1,
  • Tian-wen Ye1,
  • Liang-yu Zhao1 and
  • Ai-min Chen1Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders201516:167

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0635-x

Received: 11 November 2014

Accepted: 15 July 2015

Published: 25 July 2015

Abstract

Background

Unstable pelvic fractures usually result from high-energy trauma. There are several treatment modalities available. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical application of a new less invasive ilioinguinal approach combined with a minimally invasive posterior approach technique in patients with unstable pelvic fractures. We also address the feasibility, validity, and limitations of the technique.

Methods

Thirty-seven patients with unstable pelvic fractures were treated with our minimally invasive technique. The anterior pelvic ring fractures were treated with a less invasive ilioinguinal approach, and the sacral fractures were treated with a minimally invasive posterior approach. The clinical outcome was measured using the Majeed scoring system, and the quality of fracture reduction was evaluated. The patients were followed up for 13 to 60 months (mean, 24 months).

Results

Anatomical or near to anatomical reduction was achieved in 26 (70.3 %) of the anterior pelvic ring fractures and a satisfactory result was obtained in another 11(29.7 %). For the posterior sacral fractures, excellent reduction was obtained in 33 (89.2 %) of the fractures, with a residual deformity in the other 4 patients. One superficial wound infection and two deep vein thromboses occurred, all of which resolved with conservative treatment. The clinical outcome at one year was “excellent” in 29 patients and “good” in 8 patients (Majeed score).

Conclusions

The satisfactory results showed that a reduction and fixation of unstable pelvic fractures is possible through a combination of a limited ilioinguinal approach and posterior pelvic ring fixation. We believe our method is a new and effective alternative in the management of pelvic fractures.

Keywords

Pelvic fracturesMinimally invasive approachIlioinguinal approach

Background

Unstable pelvic fractures usually result from high-energy accidents [1]. Patients who sustain these injuries often have concomitant life-threatening conditions, such as haemorrhage and associated neurological and visceral injuries [2]. Hence, pelvic fractures are associated with high mortality and morbidity rates. Successful management of an unstable pelvic fracture is a challenge for all involved disciplines including the orthopaedic surgeon. Several treatment modalities are available for the management of unstable pelvic injuries. The use of external fixation can restore a distorted pelvic ring to a roughly normal configuration. Its use is limited, however, because of its inaccurate reduction and poor ability of the frames to stablize unstable pelvic ring fracture [3]. Surgical exposure for open reduction and fixation provide direct visualisation of the injured pelvic areas. Internal fixation has been shown to be biomechanically superior to external fixation [4, 5]. However, additional blood losses and disruption of early tamponade and clot formation should not be ignored.

For fractures of the anterior pelvic ring, which were generally treated using an ilioinguinal approach, Stoppa approach, or percutaneous intramedullary fixation [6], we recommend a similar but less invasive anterior approach for treating pubic ramus fractures. We hypothesised that complications caused by surgical dissection would be reduced when using this approach. Furthermore, the technique is not so demanding as percutaneous fixation.

The use of iliosacral screws to stablize posterior pelvic ring fractures was described by Matta and Saucedo [7]. They used closed reduction techniques to realign pelvic ring disruption. The blood losses and operation time are both minimal. Recognised complications such as the possibility of nerve root injuries, reduction and fixation failure, superior gluteal artery injury, however, are not uncommon. [810] In this study, we used the pedicle screw system for posterior pelvic ring fractures. The less invasive ilioinguinal approach combined with a minimally invasive posterior approach is presented in a series of 37 consecutive patients, who had sustained pelvic fractures.

Methods

Preoperative evaluation

A total of 37 patients with closed, unstable pelvic ring disruptions were treated from January 2008 and September 2012 at our department. All patients were evaluated based on anteroposterior, inlet and outlet plain pelvic radiography (Fig. 1a) and computed tomography scans of the pelvis (Fig. 1b). Patients were excluded from the study if they (1) had pubic symphysis separation, (2) bilateral sacral fracture, (3) sacroiliac joint injuries, (4) sacral plexus injuries that required neurolysis or decompression, or (5) injuries of unclear date or a history of conservatively or surgically treated pelvic injuries. Specific sacral fractures such as comminuted fractures, sacral dimorphism, sacral fractures with inadequate intra-operative images, which are difficult to be treated by percutaneous screws, are the best indications for this technique. Based on the rotational and vertical instabilities of the patients’ injuries, their pelvic fractures were classified as Type B or Type C according to the Tile classification [11] . There were 9 B1 cases, 17 B2 cases, 9 C1 cases and 2 C2 cases (Table 1). All patients underwent reduction and internal fixation of a pelvic fracture using our less invasive anterior approach, combined with a minimally invasive pedicle screw system for a posterior pelvic ring fracture. Written informed consent for participation in the study was obtained from all patients. The research was in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration. The medical ethics committee of the Second Military Medical University gave ethical approval (reference number 2007–029).
Fig. 1

Patient with closed unstable pelvic ring disruption. A 43-year-old woman had a type B (Tile classification) pelvic fracture caused by a traffic accident. a Preoperative pelvic radiographic image. b Preoperative computed tomographic image. c Postoperative pelvic radiographic image. d Pelvic model demonstrates two pedicle screws in each dorsal iliac crest

Table 1

Patients’ characteristics

Sex

Age (years)

Type of fracture

Cause of fracture

Concomitant injuries

Time from injury to surgery (days)

Operation time (min)

Blood loss (ml)

Reduction for fracture (anterior)

Reduction for fracture (posterior)

Male

41

Tile B2

Fall injury

No

1

160

200

Anatomic

Anatomic

Male

38

Tile B1

Traffic injury

Right humerus fracture

4

100

180

Near to Anatomic

Anatomic

Male

35

Tile B2

Fall injury

No

3

180

200

Anatomic

Anatomic

Female

43

Tile C1

Traffic injury

Left femoral neck fracture

4

140

150

Near to Anatomic

Anatomic

Male

36

Tile B2

Fall injury

No

4

100

200

Satisfactory

Anatomic

Female

34

Tile B1

Traffic injury

Left and right alcaneal fractures

5

110

100

Near to Anatomic

Anatomic

Male

46

Tile C1

Fall injury

Left calcaneal fracture

4

150

200

Satisfactory

Anatomic

Female

34

Tile C1

Traffic injury

No

5

110

100

Near to Anatomic

Anatomic

Male

40

Tile B2

Traffic injury

Left olecranon fracture

3

140

200

Anatomic

Anatomic

Male

26

Tile B2

Fall injury

Left calcaneal fracture

4

150

150

Satisfactory

Anatomic

Male

43

Tile B2

Fall injury

No

3

95

90

Near to Anatomic

Anatomic

Male

47

Tile B1

Fall injury

No

5

85

100

Anatomic

Anatomic

Female

33

Tile B2

Crush injury

No

4

100

90

Anatomic

Posterior translation and rotation

Male

46

Tile B2

Crush injury

Left humerus fracture, Multiple rib fractures,Dislocation of right hip joint

14

110

140

Satisfactory

Anatomic

Female

44

Tile C1

Crush injury

No

7

100

150

Anatomic

Anatomic

Female

20

Tile C1

Traffic injury

Mutiple rib fractures, Right olecranon fracture, Right femoral neck fracture

13

90

80

Anatomic

Anatomic

Female

25

Tile B2

Fall injury

Left distal radius fracture

6

90

95

Anatomic

Anatomic

Male

33

Tile B2

Fall injury

No

5

80

100

Satisfactory

Anatomic

Male

40

Tile B1

Crush injury

Right intertrochanteric fracture

5

70

90

Satisfactory

Anatomic

Female

42

Tile C2

Traffic injury

Right acetabular fracture

1

85

120

Satisfactory

Anatomic

Male

40

Tile B2

Crush injury

L1 compression fracture

3

80

90

Anatomic

Anatomic

Male

38

Tile B1

Crush injury

No

4

115

95

Anatomic

Anatomic

Female

46

Tile C1

Crush injury

No

6

95

80

Near to Anatomic

Anatomic

Female

43

Tile C1

Fall injury

Left and right calcaneal fractures

7

90

100

Near to Anatomic

Anatomic

Male

38

Tile C2

Crush injury

Right acetabular fracture

3

100

80

Satisfactory

Anatomic

Female

42

Tile B1

Traffic injury

No

2

85

90

Anatomic

Anatomic

Female

43

Tile B2

Fall injury

Right calcaneal fracture

4

80

90

Anatomic

Anatomic

Male

41

Tile C1

Crush injury

No

4

110

130

Anatomic

Anatomic

Male

39

Tile B2

Traffic injury

No

4

120

130

Anatomic

Posterior translation and rotation

Female

37

Tile B2

Crush injury

Left and right distal radius fractures

3

70

80

Anatomic

Anatomic

Male

36

Tile B1

Traffic injury

No

6

105

135

Satisfactory

Anatomic

Male

47

Tile B2

Traffic injury

Rib fracture, Liver laceration, Intestinal laceration

3

110

150

Near to Anatomic

Posterior translation and rotation

Female

22

Tile B1

Fall injury

No

4

100

180

Anatomic

Anatomic

Female

57

Tile B1

Traffic injury

Multiple rib fractures

7

200

210

Satisfactory

Anatomic

Female

30

Tile B2

Traffic injury

Meniscus tear of right knee

4

90

110

Near to Anatomic

Near to Anatomic

Male

34

Tile B2

Fall injury

Transverse process of lumbar vertebra fracture(L4、5)

5

180

250

Near to Anatomic

Posterior translation and rotation

Male

58

Tile C1

Traffic injury

No

5

200

240

Anatomic

Anatomic

The study group included 21 men and 16 women. The average age was 40.9 years (range, 20–58 years). There were 10 crush injuries, 13 falls from a height, and 14 traffic accidents. All patients were evaluated in the emergency room as soon as they reached our hospital. Initial assessment revealed that three patients were hemodynamically unstable, so their vital signs were stabilised emergently. Surgery for the other patients was scheduled as early as possible to obtain anatomical reduction. The three patients who required immediate vital sign stabilisation needed a relatively longer time after resuscitation in the intensive care unit before undergoing surgery. All patients provided written informed consent before the operation. The mean time from injury to operation was 4.7 days (range, 1–14 days).

Operative technique

Less invasive ilioinguinal approach for anterior ring fracture

The patient was first positioned supine on a radiolucent operation table. Surgical preparation included the abdomen and pelvic region. A catheter was inserted into the bladder before operation.

The incision for exposure through a lateral window extended along the anterior one-third of the iliac crest and ended at the anterosuperior iliac spine (Fig. 2a marked with a thick black line in the area of the anterosuperior iliac spine). Because the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve exits into the thigh over a distance approximately 2 cm medial to the anterosuperior iliac spine, the incision ensures that the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve is protected. The exposure progresses to the iliac crest using sharp dissection. The abdominal muscles and start of iliacus muscle are sharply incised from their origins. After subperiosteal elevation, the iliacus muscle is dissected from the internal iliac fossa to the anterior inferior iliac spine.
Fig. 2

Operative steps. a Marking for the incision for exposure through the lateral and medial window. b A preflexed reconstruction plate is manoeuvred from the lateral window to the medial window. c Marking for the posterosuperior iliac spine and iliac crest. d Tightening the screws with a wrench through a small incision 8 cm proximal to the midpoint between the bilateral posterosuperior iliac spines

For exposure through a medial window, a 3 to 4 cm incision is made along the line from the pubic tubercle to the pubic ramus (Fig. 2a). The incision is then extended to the inferior border of the inguinal ligament and continued through the subcutaneous tissue. After separating the deep fascia underneath the inguinal ligament, the spermatic cord (in men) or round ligament of the uterus (in women) was retracted and protected. The fascia around the iliopectineal and pectineal muscle was separated to expose the superior ramus of the pubis. The iliopsoas and neurovascular bundle could be elevated with the help of a blunt periosteal detacher, providing access to the prepared lateral window. After reduction by traction and reduction clamps, (and, if necessary, temporary fixation with Kirschner wires), a preflexed reconstruction plate with 10–12 holes was slid from the lateral window (Fig. 2b), underneath the neurovascular bundle and iliopsoas muscle, to the medial window. After adjusting its position with fluoroscopic guidance, the plate was fixed on the pelvis with two or three screws at both end of the steel plate.

Polyaxial pedicle screws for posterior pelvic fixation

After the anterior ring fracture was fixed, the anteroposterior, inlet and outlet plain radiographs were obtained introperatively using a C-arm machine to examine the posterior pelvic ring. The patient was positioned prone to fix the posterior ring fracture with polyaxial pedicle screws. The surgeon had marked the posterosuperior iliac spine and iliac crest before the operation (Fig. 2c marked with a thick black line in the area of the posterosuperior iliac spine). After disinfecting and draping the area, bilateral incisions 3 cm long were made along the posterosuperior iliac spine. The drill point was located at the first third of the dorsal iliac crest in sagittal section and 1 cm medial to the posterosuperior iliac spines in coronal section. We used a bone awl to open and widen the cortical bone. To determine the trajectory for the screw and create its tract in the ilium, the pedicle probe is angled 15°from the vertical line in coronal section. In the sagittal plane, an angle of 30°to 40° was preferred to minimise discomfort and soft tissue irritation. After two 50-mm-long and 6.5-mm-diameter polyaxial pedicle screws (LegacyC System, Medtronic sofamor, USA) were inserted into the dorsal iliac crests, a 5.5-mm-diameter precontured bar (LegacyC System, Medtronic sofamor, USA) was manoeuvred subcutaneously with the help of a vessel clamp and, connected with the two screws. The reduction and screw positions were checked intraoperatively using anteroposterior, inlet, outlet and LC2 plain radiographs. A small incision was made 8 cm proximal to the midpoint between the bilateral posterosuperior iliac spines for tightening the screws with a wrench (Fig. 2d). In five patients with comminuted fracture of the sacrum, we inserted two pedicle screws in each dorsal iliac crest, the second drill point was located at the iliac crest and 2 cm inferior to the posterosuperior iliac spines (Fig. 1c, d).

Postoperative treatment and follow-up

After surgery, all patients received an antibiotic against possible infection for one to two days and low-molecular-weight heparin for 1 week to avoid deep venous thrombosis during the hospitalisation. Postoperatively, all the patients were instructed to stay in bed and participate in lower limb and joint functional exercise for 4 weeks and then walk with partial weight bear for 6 weeks. Finally, they were allowed to walk normally 12 weeks after surgery. Complications were defined as infections, deep vein thrombosis, nerve and vascular injuries, erosion of soft tissues overlying the screw head, sexual or urinary dysfunctions and nonunions. The follow-up visits were arranged at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 1 year and 2 years postoperatively for clinical and radiographic examinations. The postoperative reduction was evaluated according to the anteroposterior, inlet and outlet pelvic views. Clinical outcome was measured using a scoring system described by Majeed [12]. Five criteria were chosen for functional assessment after major pelvic fractures: pain, standing, sitting, sexual intercourse and performance at work.

Results

The mean operation time was 112.0 min (range 70–200 min). Estimated blood loss was 131.3 mL (range 80–250 mL). The average hospital stay was 8 days (range 4–18 days). There were no obvious intraoperative injuries to blood vessels, nerves, or other viscera. The quality of anterior pelvic ring fracture reduction was expressed as anatomic (0–1 mm displacement), satisfactory (2–3 mm displacement), or unsatisfactory (>3 mm displacement) according to the criteria of Matta [13]. Anatomical reduction was achieved for 26 (70.3 %) anterior pelvic ring fractures and a satisfactory result was obtained for another 11 (29.7 %) fractures. For posterior fractures, the radiographic results were graded by the maximal residual displacement in the posterior injury to the pelvic ring. The reduction was excellent when anteriorposterior translation or vertical displacement was <5 mm [14]. Excellent reduction was obtained for 33(89.2 %) sacral fractures, although, the other four patients had residual deformity which was >5 mm. One patient who had multiple injuries developed a superficial wound infection at the incision to expose the lateral window during his hospital course. It was treated conservatively with antibiotics and had resolved at the 6–week–follow-up. Two patients developed a deep vein thrombosis before the operation. After receiving anticoagulant as a routine prophylactic measure, both were treated successfully. The patients were prospectively followed up for 13 to 60 months (mean, 24 months) in our outpatient department. No sexual or urinary dysfunction or other complications occurred during the follow-up period. The clinical outcome at 1 year was “excellent” in 29 patients and “good” in 8 patients (Table 2).
Table 2

Majeed scores of 37 patients at the last follow-up (12 months)

No.

Pain

Work

Sitting

Sexual intercourse

Standing

Total

Grade

1

25

16

8

4

32

85

Excellent

2

25

20

8

4

32

89

Excellent

3

25

20

8

4

30

87

Excellent

4

20

16

6

4

28

74

Good

5

25

20

10

4

34

93

Excellent

6

20

16

8

4

34

82

Good

7

25

20

8

4

32

89

Excellent

8

25

20

10

4

34

93

Excellent

9

20

16

6

4

28

74

Good

10

25

20

10

4

32

91

Excellent

11

30

16

10

4

36

96

Excellent

12

25

20

10

4

30

89

Excellent

13

30

20

10

4

36

100

Excellent

14

25

12

10

4

30

81

Good

15

25

16

8

4

36

89

Excellent

16

30

16

10

4

36

96

Excellent

17

30

20

10

4

36

100

Excellent

18

30

20

10

4

30

94

Excellent

19

30

12

10

4

36

92

Excellent

20

25

16

8

4

30

83

Good

21

25

20

10

4

36

95

Excellent

22

30

16

8

4

36

94

Excellent

23

30

20

10

4

36

100

Excellent

24

25

16

10

4

32

87

Excellent

25

30

20

10

4

36

100

Excellent

26

30

20

8

4

34

96

Excellent

27

30

16

8

4

36

94

Excellent

28

25

20

10

4

36

95

Excellent

29

30

20

10

4

34

98

Excellent

30

25

20

10

4

36

95

Excellent

31

30

20

10

4

34

98

Excellent

32

25

12

8

3

32

80

Good

33

30

20

8

4

36

98

Excellent

34

30

16

10

4

36

96

Excellent

35

25

16

8

3

30

82

Good

36

25

12

8

3

34

82

Good

37

30

16

10

4

36

96

Excellent

Discussion

In this study, we used limited anterior and posterior approaches to treat a series of 37 patients who presented with an unstable pelvic ring fracture. No complications such as intraoperative injuries to vessels or nerves, sexual or urinary dysfunction, nonunions occurred. Satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes were gained. There were 2 patients in our series with deep venous thrombosis occurring preoperatively but no further thromboembolic event in the postoperative phase. One patient developed a superficial wound infection at the incision and was treated with antibiotics successfully.

High-energy pelvic fractures are severe lesions that are associated with significant mortality and morbidity rates. Because of the large force required to disrupt the pelvis, pelvic fractures indicate that the patient has experienced high-energy trauma, and therefore often combined with concomitant injury [15]. Historically, pelvic fractures had been treated using a variety of methods depending on their severity. There is wide consensus that conservative treatment by traction or pelvic sling confines the patient to long bed rest with a high risk of potential complications. The application of external fixation for pelvic fractures reduces bleeding and helps manage hemodynamically unstable patients. It fails, however, to ensure sufficient stability for unstable injuries [16, 17]. Other drawbacks to external fixation include hardware prominence, fixator loosening and reoperations [1820]. There has been an increasing interest in the use of internal and stable fixation such as plates, sacral bars, and iliosacral screws for treating unstable pelvic fractures. There is also a growing body of evidence that early operative reduction and fixation of pelvic fractures contribute to lower morbidity and mortality rates and shorter hospital stays [3, 21]. The classic anterior approach to the pelvis is the ilioinguinal approach, which provides total and complete access to the anterior column from the sacroiliac joint to the pubic symphysis [22]. Use of the ilioinguinal approach for complex pelvic fractures appears to be associated with a high rate of good to excellent results. However, potential complications with this approach involve mainly the lateral cutaneous nerve of the thigh, neurovascular injuries, and asymmetric expansion of the abdomen when coughing [23]. Zobrist et al. [24] addressed these problems with the help of an endoscope. Their endoscopic technique facilitated reliable internal fixation of anterior ring fractures with minimal soft tissue trauma. This technique, however, is technically demanding, time-consuming and needs a special instrument. Vaidya et al. [25], in a recent study that included 24 patients, presented a novel internal fixation device for stabilising unstable pelvic fractures using supra-acetabular spinal pedicle screws and a subcutaneous connecting rod. There were no infections, delayed unions, or nonunions, and all fractures healed without significant loss of reduction. The authors did, however, report neuropraxia in two patients, and one patient required repositioning of the pedicle screw and readjustment of the screw rod, which had caused discomfort. Their incisions were directly over the anteroinferior iliac spine for pedicle screw placement, which is a high-risk zone in regard to injuring the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. A similar study by Heisterman et al. [26] was a randomized controlled trial that compared anterior pelvic external fixation versus anterior pelvic internal fixation for unstable pelvic ring injuries. They presented the idea of an anterior pelvic bridge, which is a percutaneous method for fixing the anterior pelvis through limited incisions over the iliac crest and pubic symphysis. In addition to the inherent limits of minimally invasive pelvic fixation (e.g., the lack of direct visualisation), their method required adequate posterior ring stability. Thus, it could be used only in patients who have residual instability anteriorly after the posterior pelvis has been verified to be stable. Yu [27] et al. introduced a similar minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique for the treatment of pubic ramus fractures in 15 patients. For exposure of the medial window, the ligaments and the pyramidal muscle were partially excised in their study, which may cause hernias because of the abdominal exposure. In contrast, neither abdominal muscle nor inguinal ligament was involved in the process of exposing the medial window in our study. We experienced no postoperative pulmonary embolism or other thromboembolic event in this series. The incidence of embolism was lower than that described in the literature. Although we recruited only 37 patients for this study, which is too low to make any definitive conclusions, we believe our approach did not result in a high incidence of thromboembolic events. No sexual or urinary dysfunction or other complications occurred during the follow-up period, which was in line with the results of others who used the anterior approach [23]. For posterior pelvic fractures, Matta and Saucedo [7] evaluated the results of three treatment techniques for unstable pelvic fractures in 1989, and introduced a technique for fixation of the posterior pelvic fractures using iliosacral screws. Routt et al. [28] described a method for percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation that caused less soft-tissue violation and blood loss, which is particularly useful in patients with multiple trauma. Because of the complexity of the pelvic anatomy, sacral variation, and the limitations of fluoroscopic control, however, there are certain recognised complications, such as screw misplacement, neurological impairment, and malreduction [29]. In an anatomical cadaver study, Collinge et al. [8] found that the deep superior branch of the superior gluteal nerve and vessels are at significant risk during percutaneous placement of iliosacral screws even when “well placed”. The injury rate in their study was 18 %. In our study, two pedicle screws connected by a precontoured bar were used to stabilize the posterior pelvic ring, a technique similar to that introduced by Sar and Kilicoglu [30]. The biomechanical studies reported in their study showed satisfactory results. The posterior pelvic fixation in the current study was not so solid as the iliosacral screw fixation or lumbopelvic fixation. As a result, the patients were encouraged to stay in bed and participate in functional exercise for 4 weeks, which is long when compared to the literature.

In our study, the anterior approach consisted of a lateral window for the ilioinguinal approach and a medial window. With less blood loss and fewer complications, it was sufficient to achieve anatomical reduction and stable fixation for unstable pelvic fractures. It was not so technically demanding as percutaneous fixation. In addition, it was less invasive as compared with the ilioinguinal approach. The present study has several limitations. First, we used an analysis based on clinical cases to predict the stability of the fixation. To obtain validated results, a rigorously designed case–control study is needed. Second, the study lacks direct biomechanical evidence to support the stability of the fixation. Third, the small number of cases mean that the final evaluation of this technique needs further investigation. Fourth, the reduction proved difficult compared to that with the classic ilioinguinal approach. One case had to be converted to the ilioinguinal approach because of the difficulty of using reduction forceps.

We are encouraged by the satisfactory efficacy provided by the minimally invasive technique in the present study. However, more cases must be investigated and analysed to see whether the clinical outcome can be improved and the complication rate can be lowered as compared with what has been reported in published literature. We believe that our method is an effective alternative for managing pelvic fractures and can be recommended to treat such injuries in the future.

Conclusions

Pelvic fractures are challenging injuries to manage. Early internal fixation and stablization of unstable pelvic ring injuries can decrease morbidity and improve long-term results. We are encouraged by our results, which showed that reduction and fixation of unstable pelvic fractures is possible using a combination of a limited ilioinguinal approach and a minimally invasive posterior approach. Although a lager number of pelvic fractures must be treated by our method to confirm that the complication rate is truly lowered and the prognosis is improved compared with other operative techniques, we believe that our method is a new and effective alternative for managing pelvic fractures.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the reviewers for their helpful comments on this paper. This study was supported by grant from General Project of the “Twelveth Five-year Plan”for Medical Science Development of PLA (no. 12 J090).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Orthopedic Trauma Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, The Second Military Medical University
(2)
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zhoushan Hospital

References

  1. McMurtry R, Walton D, Dickinson D, Kellam J, Tile M. Pelvic disruption in the polytraumatized patient: a management protocol. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;22–30.Google Scholar
  2. Mardanpour K, Rahbar M. The outcome of surgically treated traumatic unstable pelvic fractures by open reduction and internal fixation. J Inj Violence Res. 2013;5:77–83.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Keating JF, Werier J, Blachut P, Broekhuyse H, Meek RN, O'Brien PJ. Early fixation of the vertically unstable pelvis: the role of iliosacral screw fixation of the posterior lesion. J Orthop Trauma. 1999;13:107–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lindahl J, Hirvensalo E, Bostman O, Santavirta S. Failure of reduction with an external fixator in the management of injuries of the pelvic ring. Long-term evaluation of 110 patients. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1999;81:955–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Routt Jr ML, Simonian PT, Grujic L. The retrograde medullary superior pubic ramus screw for the treatment of anterior pelvic ring disruptions: a new technique. J Orthop Trauma. 1995;9:35–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gary JL, VanHal M, Gibbons SD, Reinert CM, Starr AJ. Functional outcomes in elderly patients with acetabular fractures treated with minimally invasive reduction and percutaneous fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26:278–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Matta JM, Saucedo T. Internal fixation of pelvic ring fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;83–97.Google Scholar
  8. Collinge C, Coons D, Aschenbrenner J. Risks to the superior gluteal neurovascular bundle during percutaneous iliosacral screw insertion: an anatomical cadaver study. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19:96–101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Reilly MC, Bono CM, Litkouhi B, Sirkin M, Behrens FF. The effect of sacral fracture malreduction on the safe placement of iliosacral screws. J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17:88–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Routt Jr ML, Simonian PT, Mills WJ. Iliosacral screw fixation: early complications of the percutaneous technique. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11:584–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Tile M. Acute Pelvic Fractures: I. Causation and Classification. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1996;4:143–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Majeed SA. Grading the outcome of pelvic fractures. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1989;71:304–6.Google Scholar
  13. Matta JM. Operative treatment of acetabular fractures through the ilioinguinal approach. A 10-year perspective. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;10–19.Google Scholar
  14. Lindahl J, Hirvensalo E. Outcome of operatively treated type-C injuries of the pelvic ring. Acta Orthop. 2005;76:667–78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. van Veen IH, van Leeuwen AA, van Popta T, van Luyt PA, Bode PJ, van Vugt AB. Unstable pelvic fractures: a retrospective analysis. Injury. 1995;26:81–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Wild Jr JJ, Hanson GW, Tullos HS. Unstable fractures of the pelvis treated by external fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:1010–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kregor PJ, Routt Jr ML. Unstable pelvic ring disruptions in unstable patients. Injury. 1999;30 Suppl 2:B19–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Patel VR, Menon DK, Pool RD, Simonis RB. Nonunion of the humerus after failure of surgical treatment. Management using the Ilizarov circular fixator. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2000;82:977–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Mason WT, Khan SN, James CL, Chesser TJ, Ward AJ. Complications of temporary and definitive external fixation of pelvic ring injuries. Injury. 2005;36:599–604.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Tucker MC, Nork SE, Simonian PT, Routt Jr ML. Simple anterior pelvic external fixation. J Trauma. 2000;49:989–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Riemer BL, Butterfield SL, Diamond DL, et al. Acute mortality associated with injuries to the pelvic ring: the role of early patient mobilization and external fixation. J Trauma. 1993;35:671–5. discussion 676–677.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Letournel E. Fractures of the acetabulum. A study of a series of 75 cases. 1961. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994:5–9.Google Scholar
  23. Letournel E. The treatment of acetabular fractures through the ilioinguinal approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;62–76.Google Scholar
  24. Zobrist R, Messmer P, Levin LS, Regazzoni P. Endoscopic-assisted, minimally invasive anterior pelvic ring stabilization: a new technique and case report. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16:515–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Vaidya R, Colen R, Vigdorchik J, Tonnos F, Sethi A. Treatment of unstable pelvic ring injuries with an internal anterior fixator and posterior fixation: initial clinical series. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26:1–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hiesterman TG, Hill BW, Cole PA. Surgical technique: a percutaneous method of subcutaneous fixation for the anterior pelvic ring: the pelvic bridge. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:2116–23.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Yu X, Tang M, Zhou Z, Peng X, Wu T, Sun Y. Minimally invasive treatment for pubic ramus fractures combined with a sacroiliac joint complex injury. Int Orthop. 2013;37:1547–54.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Routt Jr ML, Kregor PJ, Simonian PT, Mayo KA. Early results of percutaneous iliosacral screws placed with the patient in the supine position. J Orthop Trauma. 1995;9:207–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. van den Bosch EW, van Zwienen CM, van Vugt AB. Fluoroscopic positioning of sacroiliac screws in 88 patients. J Trauma. 2002;53:44–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Sar C, Kilicoglu O. S1 pediculoiliac screw fixation in instabilities of the sacroiliac complex: biomechanical study and report of two cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17:262–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Zhu et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement