Skip to main content

The association of BMI and knee pain among persons with radiographic knee osteoarthritis: A cross-sectional study



Many people with radiographic knee osteoarthritis (RKOA) do not present with pain. It is suspected that such persons tend toward lower body mass index (BMI). The purpose of the study was to explore the relationship between BMI and knee pain among persons with RKOA.


Subjects in the Clearwater Osteoarthritis Study with RKOA (N = 576) were classified as reporting knee pain (Pain) or no knee pain (No Pain). WHO-classified BMI categories were compared by pain status. Odds ratios were calculated for the four elevated BMI groups, with the normal BMI group as the reference group. Elevated BMI was the risk factor, and knee pain status was the outcome factor.


Pain subjects presented with a higher mean BMI (30.4 kg/m2) compared with No Pain subjects (27.5 kg/m2) (p < 0.0001). Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios demonstrated a positive association between BMI group and pain for each successive elevated BMI category. Adjusted odds ratios ranged from 1.6 for the Pre-obese group (p < 0.05) to 7.5 for the Obese III group (p < 0.0001).


Among subjects with RKOA, those presenting with an elevated BMI had a greater likelihood of knee pain compared to subjects with a normal BMI, and this chance rose with each successive elevated BMI category. As BMI is a modifiable risk factor, longitudinal research is needed to confirm these findings and elucidate the mechanisms underlying this relationship.

Peer Review reports


Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is particularly common in older adults, with one survey finding radiographic evidence of knee OA in 33% of subjects aged 63 – 93 years [1]. Symptomatic knee OA is a major cause of physical disability afflicting older persons, due to pain, stiffness, and joint instability [2, 3]. While the cause of radiographic knee OA (RKOA) remains unclear, it has been associated with various risk factors, such as advancing age, female gender, genetic predisposition, prior knee injury, certain occupations, biomechanical gait and alignment defects, and obesity. Of these, obesity is perhaps the most important risk factor associated with the incidence of RKOA [48].

Epidemiological studies have linked RKOA-related knee pain with increasing radiographic severity, bone marrow lesions, bone ulceration, quadriceps weakness, and psychological factors [9]. However, a clear profile of those who experience pain and those who do not remains to be elucidated. Independent of radiographic features, many patients with RKOA do not present with accompanying pain [9, 10]. Careful study of these knee pain-free RKOA patients may help elucidate both causes and potential palliative treatments for those with painful RKOA. As there is no cure for OA on the horizon, it is important to identify the factors that influence the risk of symptomatic knee OA, as this could help clinicians guide their patients in taking steps (e.g. weight loss) to prevent or delay the onset of pain and impairments that may lead to work disability, daily living disability, and joint replacement surgery.

It is known that persons with higher body mass indexes (BMI; kg/m2) are more likely than persons with normal BMI to report idiopathic knee pain and accompanying disability [1113]. Although this would suggest that elevated BMI is a potential risk factor for knee pain among persons with RKOA, relatively little research has been conducted in this area. In 2007, Marks [14] reported that among individuals with RKOA, those with higher BMIs reported more pain. Similarly, Felson and colleagues [15] found that study subjects with symptomatic knee OA presented with elevated BMI levels compared to their asymptomatic counterparts. However, uncertainty remains regarding this potential relationship. A 1995 study investigated the relationship between pain and BMI among patients with RKOA and found no association [16]. Our current study aims to help clarify these findings by reporting odds ratios to further quantify the relationship between pain and BMI among persons with RKOA. Using a sample of subjects with RKOA, our cross-sectional study [17] seeks to quantify the association between BMI and knee pain among subjects with radiographic evidence of knee OA.


The Clearwater Osteoarthritis Study (COS) is an on-going community-based cohort study designed to identify the major risk factors for the development and progression of OA. A complete description of the COS has been previously published [18]. In brief, over 3700 people have been enrolled in the study to date, which began in 1988 and will be conducted over a 25-year period. The COS was approved by the community-based Institutional Review Board of the Arthritis Research Institute of America, an uncompensated, non-employee board that has representation from the medical disciplines. Subjects are recruited by community announcements and seminars at community organizations, as well as through the local school system and government employees. Subjects sign informed consent documents at each exam. Persons of both genders age 40 years and older, with or without OA, are included. The exclusion criteria include self-reported rheumatic disease (other than OA), disabling neuralgic disease, wheelchair dependence, or mental incompetence. After eligibility is determined and informed consent has been obtained, the subject's height and weight is measured without shoes. Subjects complete a questionnaire detailing demographics, family and medical history, work and lifestyle history, a self-reported functional assessment, and a module describing joint symptoms. Radiographs, including a weight-bearing anteroposterior view of both knees, are taken at the first and all subsequent exams.


Our primary null hypothesis for the present study was that, among subjects with RKOA, elevated BMI is not associated with pain status. We used a cross-sectional design, and our study sample included 576 subjects. Sample selection from the COS is detailed in Figure 1. COS subjects who had undergone partial or total knee joint replacement surgery or reported a history of knee trauma were excluded from the analysis. RKOA was determined by the criteria of Kellgren & Lawrence [19] and defined as Grade 2 or higher readings in either or both knees. All radiographs were graded by a board certified radiologist. Positive history of knee injury was determined by affirmative responses to either of the following questions: "Have you ever had a fractured knee?" or, "Have you ever had a severe twisting of either knee with resultant sprain or swelling lasting more than two weeks?" Subjects with knee injury history were excluded, so our sample subjects would more closely align with the American College of Rheumatology criteria for primary knee OA [20]. Based on knee pain status, subjects were categorized as having knee pain (Pain) or no knee pain (No Pain). Subjects categorized as Pain must have presented with pain in (at least) the knee with radiographic evidence of OA. The questionnaire depicted a human figure on which subjects were asked to circle up to four noted areas of the knee(s) that were painful. Subjects that reported "No pain" or "Don't know" were included in the No Pain category. A pain rating scale was not provided.

Using the World Health Organization's International Classification [21], subjects were placed into one of five BMI groups (kg/m2) as follows: Normal (18.5 to 24.9); Overweight/Pre-obese (25 to 29.9); Obese class I (30 to 34.9); Obese class II (35 to 39.9); and Obese class III (40+). There were too few underweight subjects (BMI < 18.5; n = 3) with RKOA for meaningful analysis of that group. BMI was compared by knee pain status (Pain or No Pain). Factors thought to be potential confounders when assessing the relationship between BMI and knee pain were considered; these included disease severity (as measured by OA grade), age, gender, occupation, education, and self-reported disease status for diabetes, heart disease, and stroke. Subjects were classified as "High-risk occupation" if they reported that the job they had for most of their life involved "standing most of the time" or "jolting of the feet and legs" (Table 1). Age and gender were retained in the final adjusted analyses.

Figure 1

Sample selection from the Clearwater Osteoarthritis Study.

Table 1 Study sample demographics by pain status among subjects (N = 576) with radiographic knee osteoarthritisa


Frequencies, percentages, and means were used to provide descriptive data regarding the study sample. To estimate the strength of the association between BMI and knee pain, we computed odds ratios (OR) [22] using multiple logistic regression [23, 24]. Knee pain status (yes/no) was the outcome factor. With BMI as the exposure factor, subjects with normal BMI (18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2) served as the reference group for the analyses (e.g. Normal vs. Obese III). A regression model was run for each BMI group. To address the potential for confounding when assessing the association between BMI and knee pain, we ran an adjusted statistical model (Pain = BMI + age + gender + RKOA grade). Logistic regression was used, as we had a binary outcome and several explanatory factors (e.g. gender) in the statistical model [25]. Based on preliminary analyses, as well as consideration of known factors related to OA, we built our final adjusted model with the inclusion of BMI, age, gender, and disease severity (as measured by OA grade). Confidence internals were reported for the odds ratios. Every tenth subjects' assembled radiographs were independently interpreted by a non-affiliated radiologist blinded to the results of the first reading. The inter-observer variability of x-ray interpretations was calculated using the kappa coefficient [26] measuring the amount of agreement that is above random chance. SAS/STAT® software version 9.2 was used for all analyses [27].


The inter-reader reliability of x-ray interpretations between the first and second radiologist reflected 93% agreement (kappa = 0.85).

The Pain and No Pain groups included 329 and 247 subjects, respectively. Study sample demographics are presented in Table 1. BMI category and OA grade counts by pain status are presented in Table 2. Evaluation for potential confounding showed no clinically relevant differences regarding diabetes, heart disease, stroke, occupation and education between the Pain and No Pain groups.

Table 2 BMI category and OA grade counts, by pain status among subjects (N = 576) with radiographic knee osteoarthritisa

The Pain group presented with a significantly higher BMI (30.4 kg/m2) when compared with the No Pain group (27.5 kg/m2) (p < 0.0001).

Odds ratios for the association between BMI and knee pain are presented in Table 3. Unadjusted analyses demonstrated a positive association for this relationship. Subjects in the lowest elevated BMI category (Pre-Obese) showed the smallest association (OR = 1.6) while subjects in the highest BMI category (Obese III) showed the highest association (OR = 7.8). For the four elevated BMI groups, a positive relationship with pain was found in the unadjusted and adjusted analyses. After adjustment for age, gender, and RKOA grade, subjects in the Pre-obese category again demonstrated the smallest association (OR = 1.6) while subjects in the Obese III category demonstrated the highest association (OR = 7.5).

Table 3 Association between body mass index and knee pain among subjects (N = 576) with radiographic knee osteoarthritisa


Our results support those of two prior studies [14, 15] and are in contrast to a third [16]. However, to our knowledge, the relationship among BMI, RKOA and knee pain has not been previously reported in terms of odds ratios. Overweight and obese subjects with RKOA were found to have a higher likelihood for knee pain compared to normal weight RKOA subjects. The chance for knee pain rose substantially with each successive elevated BMI category. Those in the highest BMI category, Obese III, had the highest chance compared to subjects in the Normal BMI group.

While our results demonstrate a strong link between increased BMI and knee pain among persons with RKOA, indicating overweight and obesity as a potential cause of knee pain, the cross-sectional design limits our ability to rule out alternative explanations. One such explanation may be that knee pain precedes a high BMI. That is, RKOA-associated knee pain in a normal weight person may lead to a sedentary lifestyle which in turn leads to weight gain. High BMI in these patients would therefore be secondary to knee pain, rather than the reverse. However, other investigators have discounted this notion, concluding there is "no evidence that the association between BMI and knee OA is stronger for those with knee symptoms" [9]. Other studies have demonstrated that overweight and obese patients with knee pain experience a reduction in pain and improvement in physical function from weight loss [2830]. It is therefore reasonable to speculate that pain-free RKOA patients of normal weight are at a reduced risk for developing knee pain, and could remain at this lower risk by maintaining a normal BMI.

Sharma and Kapoor [9] propose several mechanisms that could account for knee pain among persons with RKOA, including bone marrow lesions, bone ulceration, quadriceps weakness, and psychological factors. It is unclear how these factors may relate to BMI. A recent study [31] found a significant association between obesity and several psychiatric disorders, including major depression and dysthmia. Other reports have related depression to pain in general [32] and to knee pain, specifically [33]. It is reasonable to assume that persons with higher BMI may manifest greater knee OA pain at least in part due to higher rates of depression or other psychological factors.


Our findings can be built upon with a longitudinal study designed to further elucidate the involved mechanisms. It might also be instructive to follow pain-free persons with RKOA (without a history of knee trauma) to observe possible associations between changes in BMI and the risk for knee pain.


  1. 1.

    Felson DT, Naimark A, Anderson J, Kazis L, Castelli W, Meenan RF: The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the elderly: the Framingham Osteoarthritis Study. Arthritis Rheum. 1987, 30: 914-18. 10.1002/art.1780300811.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Lawrence RC, Helmick CG, Arnett FC, Deyo RA, Felson DT, Giannini EH, Heyse SP, Hirsch R, Hochberg MC, Hunder GG, Liang MH, Pillemer SR, Steen VD, Wolfe F: Estimates of the Prevalence of Arthritis and Selected Musculoskeletal Disorders in the United States. Arthritis Rheum. 1998, 41: 778-99. 10.1002/1529-0131(199805)41:5<778::AID-ART4>3.0.CO;2-V.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hicks JE, Perry MB, Gerber LH: Rehabilitation in the Management of Patients with Osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis: Diagnosis and Medical/Surgical Management. Edited by: Moskowitz R, Howell DS, Altman RD, Buckwalter JA, Goldberg VM. 2001, Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 3

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Felson DT, Zhang Y, Hannan MT, Naimark A, Weissman B, Aliabadi P, Levy D: Risk Factors for Incident Radiographic Knee Osteoarthritis in the elderly: the Framingham Study. Arthritis Rheum. 1997, 40: 728-33. 10.1002/art.1780400420.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Cooper C, Snow S, McAlindon TE, Kellingray S, Stuart B, Coggon D, Dieppe PA: Risk Factors for the Incidence and Progression of Radiographic Knee Osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2000, 43: 995-1000. 10.1002/1529-0131(200005)43:5<995::AID-ANR6>3.0.CO;2-1.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Naimark A, Walker AM, Meenan RF: Obesity and Knee Osteoarthritis: The Framingham Study. Ann Intern Med. 1988, 109: 18-24.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Felson DT: Weight and osteoarthritis. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996, 63 (suppl): 430S-2S.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lohmander LS, Gerhardsson M, Rollof J, Nilsson PM, Engstrom G: Incidence of severe knee and hip osteoarthritis in relation to different measures of body mass. A population-based prospective cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008, Published online 8 May.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Sharma L, Kapoor D: Epidemiology of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis: Diagnosis and medical/surgical management. Edited by: Moskowitz RW, Altman RD, Hochberg MC, Buckwalter JA, Goldberg VM. 2007, Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 4

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Du H, Chen SL, Bao CD, Wang XD, Lu Y, Gu YY, Xu JR, Chai WM, Chen J, Hiroshi N, Kusuki N: Prevalence and risk factors of knee osteoarthritis in Huang-Pu District, Shanghai, China. Rheumatology International. 2005, 25: 585-90. 10.1007/s00296-004-0492-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Webb R, Brammah T, Lunt M, Urwin M, Allison T, Symmons D: Opportunities for prevention of 'clinically significant' knee pain: Results from a population-based cross sectional survey. J Public Health (Oxf). 2004, 26: 277-84. 10.1093/pubmed/fdh162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Adamson J, Ebrahim S, Dieppe P, Hunt K: Prevalence and risk factors for joint pain among men and women in the West of Scotland Twenty-07 Study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006, 65: 520-4. 10.1136/ard.2005.037317.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Jinks C, Jordan K, Croft P: Disabling knee pain – another consequence of obesity: results from a prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2006, 19 (6): 258-10.1186/1471-2458-6-258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Marks R: Obesity profiles with knee osteoarthritis: correlation with pain, disability, disease progression. Obesity. 2007, 15 (7): 1867-1874. 10.1038/oby.2007.221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Felson DT, Chaisson CE, Hill CL, Totterman SM, Gale ME, Skinner KM, Kazis L, Gale DR: The association of bone marrow lesions with pain in knee osteoarthritis. Ann Intern Med. 2001, 134: 541-549.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lethbridge-Cejku M, Scott WW, Reichle R: Association of radiographic features of osteoarthritis of the knee with knee pain: Data from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Arthritis Care Res. 1995, 8: 182-88. 10.1002/art.1790080311.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hennekens CH, Buring JE: Epidemiology in Medicine. 1987, Boston, MA and Toronto: Little, Brown and Co., 108-112.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wilder FV, Hall BJ, Barrett JP, Lemrow NB: History of acute knee injury and osteoarthritis of the knee: a prospective epidemiological assessment The Clearwater Osteoarthritis Study. Osteoarthritis & Cartilage. 2002, 10: 611-16. 10.1053/joca.2002.0795.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS: Atlas of standard radiographs, the epidemiology of chronic rheumatism. 1963, Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 2

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K, Christy W, Cooke TD, Greenwald R, Hochberg M: Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis Rheum. 1986, 29 (8): 1039-49. 10.1002/art.1780290816.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    World Health Organization Expert Committee on Physical Status: The Use and Interpretation of Anthropometry. Report of a World Health Organization Expert Committee. Technical Report Series 854. 1995, Geneva: World Health Organization

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Morgenstern H: Epidemiologic Research Principles and Quantitative Methods. 1982, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 243-250.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Dawson-Saunders B, Trapp RG: Basic and Clinical Biostatistics. 1994, Norwalk, CN: Appleton & Lange, 222-223. 2

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    SAS Institute Inc.: Logistic Regression Examples Using the SAS System, Version 6. 1995, Cary, NC; SAS Institute Inc., First

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Walker GA: Common Statistical Methods for Clinical Research with SAS® Examples. 1997, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 225-226.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kelsey JL, Thompson WD, Evans AS: Methods in Observational Epidemiology. 1986, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 290-92.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    SAS Institute Inc: SAS/STAT software. CD-ROM. (Version 9.2, SAS System for Windows). 2008, Cary, NC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Felson DT, Zhang Y, Anthony JM, Naimark A, Andersonn JJ: Weight loss reduces the risk for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in women. The Framingham Study. Ann Intern Med. 1992, 116: 535-7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Abu-Abeid S, Wishnitzer N, Szold A, Leibergall M, Manor O: The influence of surgically-induced weight loss on the knee joint. Obes Surg. 2005, 15: 1437-42. 10.1381/096089205774859281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Miller GD, Nicklas BJ, Davis C, Loeser RF, Lenchik L, Messier SP: Intensive weight loss program improves function in older obese adults with knee osteoarthritis. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006, 14: 1219-30. 10.1038/oby.2006.139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Petry NM, Barry D, Pietrzak RH, Wagner JA: Overweight and obesity are associated with psychologic disorders: results form the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Psychosom Med. 2008, 70 (3): 288-97. 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181651651.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Bair J, Robinson RL, Eckert GJ, Stang PE, Croghan TW, Kroenke K: Impact of Pain on Depression Treatment Response in Primary Care. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2004, 66: 17-22. 10.1097/01.PSY.0000106883.94059.C5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Jinks C, Jordan KP, Biagojevic M, Croft P: Predictors of onset of progression of knee pain in adults living in the community. A prospective study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008, 47 (3): 368-74. 10.1093/rheumatology/kem374.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

  1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

Download references


The authors would like to thank Paul Leaverton, PhD, for his assistance in reviewing and revising the manuscript.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew W Rogers.

Additional information

Competing interests

This research was funded by private donations. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

MWR developed the study concept and drafted the manuscript. FVW designed and conducted the statistical analysis and helped draft the manuscript.

Matthew W Rogers and Frances V Wilder contributed equally to this work.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rogers, M.W., Wilder, F.V. The association of BMI and knee pain among persons with radiographic knee osteoarthritis: A cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9, 163 (2008).

Download citation


  • Body Mass Index
  • Knee Pain
  • Normal Body Mass Index
  • Body Mass Index Category
  • Body Mass Index Group