- Technical advance
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Ipsilateral free semitendinosus tendon graft transfer for reconstruction of chronic tears of the Achilles tendon
© Maffulli et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
- Received: 27 February 2008
- Accepted: 08 July 2008
- Published: 08 July 2008
Many techniques have been developed for the reconstruction of the Achilles tendon in chronic tears. In presence of a large gap (greater than 6 centimetres), tendon augmentation is required.
We present our method of minimally invasive semitendinosus reconstruction for the Achilles tendon using one para-midline and one midline incision.
The first incision is a 5 cm longitudinal incision, made 2 cm proximal and just medial to the palpable end of the residual tendon. The second incision is 3 cm long and is also longitudinal but is 2 cm distal and in the midline to the distal end of the tendon rupture. The distal and proximal Achilles tendon stumps are mobilised. After trying to reduce the gap of the ruptured Achilles tendon, if the gap produced is greater than 6 cm despite maximal plantar flexion of the ankle and traction on the Achilles tendon stumps, the ipsilateral semitendinosus tendon is harvested. The semitendinosus tendon is passed through small incisions in the substance of the proximal stump of the Achilles tendon, and it is sutured to the Achilles tendon. It is then passed beneath the intact skin bridge into the distal incision, and passed from medial to lateral through a transverse tenotomy in the distal stump. With the ankle in maximal plantar flexion, the semitendinosus tendon is sutured to the Achilles tendon at each entry and exit point
This minimally invasive technique allows reconstruction of the Achilles tendon using the tendon of semitendinosus preserving skin integrity over the site most prone to wound breakdown, and can be especially used to reconstruct the Achilles tendon in the presence of large gap (greater than 6 centimetres).
- Achilles Tendon
- Sural Nerve
- Hamstring Tendon
- Semitendinosus Tendon
- Distal Stump
The Achilles tendon (AT) is the most commonly ruptured tendon in the human body . About 20% of complete ruptures of the AT are diagnosed late. The management of chronic ruptures of tendo Achillis is usually different from that of acute rupture, as the tendon ends normally will have retracted [1, 2]. The blood supply to this area is relatively poor, and the tendon ends have to be freshened to allow healing. Due to the increased gap, primary repair is not generally possible . Operative procedures for reconstruction of the AT include flap tissue turn down using one [3, 4] and two flaps , local tendon transfer [6–9], and autologous hamstring tendon harvesting . All of these techniques use a single longitudinal incision for exposure. Following these procedures, complications, especially wound breakdown and infection (9%) , are not infrequent, are probably related to the paucity of the soft tissue vascularity, and may require plastic surgical procedures to cover significant soft tissue defects .
We have recently described our minimally invasive technique of peroneus brevis reconstruction for the AT using two para-midline incisions . This technique allows reconstruction of the AT using peroneus brevis preserving skin integrity over the site most prone to wound breakdown.
During surgery, sometimes, after trying to reduce the gap of the ruptured AT, the gap produced is greater than 6 cm despite maximal plantar flexion of the ankle and traction on the AT stumps . In such instances, peroneus brevis is not sufficient to full the gap, and ipsilateral hamstring tendon harvesting can be an option .
We present our method of minimally invasive semitendinosus reconstruction for the AT. Our technique uses one proximal para-midline incision and one distal midline incision preserving skin integrity over the site most prone to wound breakdown.
All procedures described in the present article were approved by the Local Ethics Committee of the Keele University School of Medicine, Stoke on Trent, United Kingdom and all patients gave their written consent.
The proximal tendon is then mobilised from the proximal wound, any adhesions are divided, and further soft tissue release anterior to the soleus and gastrocnemius allows maximal excursion, minimising the gap between the two tendon stumps. A Vicryl locking suture is run along the free tendon edge to allow adequate exposure and to prevent separation of the bundles.
After trying to reduce the gap of the ruptured AT, if the gap produced is greater than 6 cm despite maximal plantar flexion of the ankle and traction on the AT stumps, the ipsilateral semitendinosus is harvested.
Post operatively, patients are allowed to weight bear as comfort allows with the use of elbow crutches [15, 16]. It would be unusual for a patient to weight bear fully at this stage. After 2 weeks, the back shell is removed, and physiotherapy is commenced with the front shell in situ preventing dorsiflexion of the ankle, focusing on proprioception, plantar-flexion of the ankle, inversion and eversion [15, 16]. During this period of rehabilitation, the patient is permitted to weight bear as comfort allows with the front shell in situ although full weight bearing rarely occurs on account of balance difficulties and patients usually still require the assistance of a single elbow crutch as this stage. The front shell may be finally removed after 6 weeks. We do not use a heel raise after removal of the cast, and patients normally regain a plantigrade ankle over two or three weeks [15, 16].
The principal findings of the present study are that our new method of minimally invasive semitendinosus reconstruction for the AT can be an option to reconstitute the integrity of the flexor apparatus of the foot in patients with a gap greater than 6 cm.
Chronic ruptures of the AT pose a technical challenge, with more complications in patients with a neglected rupture. When compared with open repair in patients with a fresh rupture, reconstruction of the AT in patients with a neglected rupture takes longer, and this may account for some of the wound problems [1, 17, 18].
Wound breakdown is a challenging complications in AT reconstruction surgery, with open techniques having a 9% superficial infection rate . To minimize the rate of infection after AT reconstruction, we already described a minimally invasive technique of reconstruction of AT using peroneus brevis . That technique allows reconstruction of the AT using peroneus brevis preserving skin integrity, and can be especially used to reconstruct the AT in the presence of previous surgery .
However, during surgery it may occurs that, after trying to reduce the gap of the ruptured AT, the gap produced is greater than 6 cm despite maximal plantar flexion of the ankle and traction on the AT stumps . In such instances, peroneus brevis is not sufficient to fill the gap, and tendon augmentation can be required. In neglected ruptures with a large gap, turn down flaps have been advocated. However, in these patients, the quality of the proximal stump from which the turn down flaps are prepared is often suboptimal, and the flaps may still need reinforcement with another tendon. The tendon of semitendinosus is long and strong and provides a robust reconstruction to the AT. We already described the use of a free gracilis tendon graft in this condition  and recently semitendinosus tendon augmentation has been described for a large defect after AT rupture in 2 patients . A free semitendinosus graft does not deprive the foot of motor strength and power, is safe, and, given its length, can be used to bridge large gaps. The great advantage of this technique is that it allows to perform a semitendinosus tendon augmentation in a minimally invasive fashion, preserving skin integrity.
To our knowledge, this is the first time that a reconstruction of the AT using a free semitendinosus tendon graft is performed in a minimally invasive fashion. Open reconstruction techniques use relatively long longitudinal incisions, and, in many instances, have incorporated plastic surgical flap procedures to facilitate skin closure [20, 21].
Following surgery, the ankle is kept in equinus to prevent disruption of the reconstruction. Vascularity of the soft tissues is maximal at 20° of plantar flexion, and at 40° of plantar flexion the blood supply of the skin is reduced by 49% . Therefore, the tightness of the repair may influence wound healing.
In patients with chronic ruptures, the skin over the gap retracts over several weeks, and remains so until the operation. In open surgery, this skin is incised, and is then stretched out in a relatively acute fashion to accommodate the reconstructed tendon. Therefore, following the reconstruction, the skin over the gap may well be stretched so much that vascular supply is impaired . The reconstructed gastro-soleus AT complex will stretch with increased loading and range of movement exercises during rehabilitation .
Preservation of skin cover during reconstruction procedures is clearly an advantage, as the skin is not injured by the operation, and protects the reconstruction beneath. As with all surgery performed through minimally invasive incisions, this procedure is technically demanding. Careful incision placement is required together with skin retraction to allow visualisation of the tendon ends and to permit the reconstruction. This technique is designed to preserve skin cover of the reconstruction site, and, although reconstruction is always risky, it may extend the indications for surgery in patients prone to wound complications such as vasculopaths and diabetics who present with a large gap.
We acknowledge that this is a technical note, and no data about outcome of our patients are presented. However, our preliminary results are good and we plan to evaluate the long term results of this technique. This will be the subject of future endeavours.
This technique allows minimally invasive reconstruction of the AT using semitendinosus tendon preserving skin integrity, and can be especially used to reconstruct the AT in the presence of large gap (greater than 6 cm).
- Maffulli N, Ajis A, Longo UG, Denaro V: Chronic rupture of tendo Achillis. Foot Ankle Clin. 2007, 12 (4): 583-96, vi. 10.1016/j.fcl.2007.07.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maffulli N: Rupture of the Achilles tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999, 81 (7): 1019-1036.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee YS, Lin CC, Chen CN, Chen SH, Liao WY, Huang CR: Reconstruction for neglected Achilles tendon rupture: the modified Bosworth technique. Orthopedics. 2005, 28 (7): 647-650.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Christensen I: Rupture of the Achilles tendon; analysis of 57 cases. Acta Chir Scand. 1953, 106 (1): 50-60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arner O, Lindholm A: Subcutaneous rupture of the Achilles tendon; a study of 92 cases. Acta Chir Scand Suppl. 1959, 116 (Supp 239): 1-51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dekker M, Bender J: Results of surgical treatment of rupture of the Achilles tendon with use of the plantaris tendon. Arch Chir Neerl. 1977, 29 (1): 39-46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wapner KL, Pavlock GS, Hecht PJ, Naselli F, Walther R: Repair of chronic Achilles tendon rupture with flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer. Foot Ankle. 1993, 14 (8): 443-449.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilcox DK, Bohay DR, Anderson JG: Treatment of chronic achilles tendon disorders with flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer/augmentation. Foot Ankle Int. 2000, 21 (12): 1004-1010.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- McClelland D, Maffulli N: Neglected rupture of the Achilles tendon: reconstruction with peroneus brevis tendon transfer. Surgeon. 2004, 2 (4): 209-213.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maffulli N, Leadbetter WB: Free gracilis tendon graft in neglected tears of the achilles tendon. Clin J Sport Med. 2005, 15 (2): 56-61. 10.1097/01.jsm.0000152714.05097.ef.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pintore E, Barra V, Pintore R, Maffulli N: Peroneus brevis tendon transfer in neglected tears of the Achilles tendon. J Trauma. 2001, 50 (1): 71-78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kumta SM, Maffulli N: Local flap coverage for soft tissue defects following open repair of Achilles tendon rupture. Acta Orthop Belg. 2003, 69 (1): 59-66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carmont MR, Maffulli N: Less invasive Achilles tendon reconstruction. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007, 8: 100-10.1186/1471-2474-8-100.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Webb J, Moorjani N, Radford M: Anatomy of the sural nerve and its relation to the Achilles tendon. Foot Ankle Int. 2000, 21 (6): 475-477.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maffulli N, Tallon C, Wong J, Peng Lim K, Bleakney R: No adverse effect of early weight bearing following open repair of acute tears of the Achilles tendon. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2003, 43 (3): 367-379.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maffulli N, Tallon C, Wong J, Lim KP, Bleakney R: Early weightbearing and ankle mobilization after open repair of acute midsubstance tears of the achilles tendon. Am J Sports Med. 2003, 31 (5): 692-700.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carmont MR, Maffulli N: Management of insertional Achilles tendinopathy through a Cincinnati incision. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007, 8: 82-10.1186/1471-2474-8-82.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Carmont MR, Maffulli N: Achilles tendon rupture following surgical management for tendinopathy: a case report. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007, 8: 19-10.1186/1471-2474-8-19.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ji JH, Kim WY, Kim YY, Lee YS, Yoon JS: Semitendinosus tendon augmentation for a large defect after Achilles tendon rupture: two case reports. Foot Ankle Int. 2007, 28 (10): 1100-1103. 10.3113/FAI.2007.1100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Attinger CE, Ducic I, Hess CL, Basil A, Abbruzzesse M, Cooper P: Outcome of skin graft versus flap surgery in the salvage of the exposed achilles tendon in diabetics versus nondiabetics. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006, 117 (7): 2460-2467. 10.1097/01.prs.0000219345.73727.f5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ademoglu Y, Ozerkan F, Ada S, Bora A, Kaplan I, Kayalar M, Kul F: Reconstruction of skin and tendon defects from wound complications after Achilles tendon rupture. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2001, 40 (3): 158-165.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Poynton AR, O'Rourke K: An analysis of skin perfusion over the achilles tendon in varying degrees of plantarflexion. Foot Ankle Int. 2001, 22 (7): 572-574.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/9/100/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.