Volume 16 Supplement 1
Musculoskeletal health from the “One Medicine” perspective – what can we learn from large and small animal models (with emphasis on articular cartilage)?
© van Weeren and Tryfonidou 2015
Published: 1 December 2015
In human medicine musculoskeletal diseases rank (together with mental disorders) first in reasons for occupational disability and have a huge impact on both quality of life and overall healthcare costs. The current increase in life expectancy, together with decreasing societal acceptance of impaired mobility, have strongly pushed musculoskeletal research in recent years.
The classic animal models for research into musculoskeletal disease are small rodents, especially mice and rats. As larger species, goats and to a lesser extent sheep have been the species of choice. This choice was largely based on practical and logistical considerations such as the required size, availability, costs and ease of handling, rather than on biomedical criteria.
The growing acceptance of the “One Health, One Medicine” concept has, together with better knowledge of fundamental differences between mammalian species in articular cartilage biology and the increasing pressure to reduce, refine and replace (the three “Rs”) animal experimentation, led to a change in attitude towards the use of animal models in musculoskeletal research. Whereas small rodents may still be a logical step after in vitro research, the fundamental differences between articular cartilage composition of smaller species and those heavier than about 1Kg, together with the increasing recognition of the role of biomechanics within the joint, cast severe doubts on the validity of these species for anything but very basic work in musculoskeletal research. In contrast, within the “One Medicine” concept it is clear that in veterinary medicine there are several species featuring a high prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders that are very similar to those seen in humans. This applies to dogs with intervertebral disc disease and chronic joint disorders (especially osteoarthritis (OA)) in both horses and dogs. These developments have led to a gradual shift in the use of animals in musculoskeletal research. Also, regulatory bodies are making this shift of mind with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) now requiring preparatory work in horses before approval for certain orthopaedic devices is granted.
There is one other important aspect to this development. Whereas the classic animal models were solely used to the benefit of human research, research in dogs and horses will forcibly lead to medical improvements for these species, as they are patients too and hence not only experimental animals, but target species as well. This is an important asset for the ethical justification for the use of animals for scientific research.
- Palazzo C, Ravaud JF, Papelard A, Ravaud P, Poiraudeau S: The burden of musculoskeletal conditions. PLoS One. 2014, 9 (3): e90633-24595187, 3942474, 10.1371/journal.pone.0090633View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Cook JL, Hung CT, Kuroki K, Stoker AM, Cook CR, Pfeiffer FM, Sherman SL, Stannard JP: Animal models of cartilage repair. Bone Joint Res. 2;3 (4): 89-94.Google Scholar
- Malda J, de Grauw JC, Benders KEM, Kik MJL, van de Lest CA, Creemers LB, Dhert WJA, van Weeren PR: Of mice, men and elephants: the relation between articular cartilage thickness and body mass. PLoS One. 2013, 8 (2): e57683-23437402, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXjs12nt78%3D, 3578797, 10.1371/journal.pone.0057683View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bergknut N, Rutges JP, Kranenburg HJ, Smolders LA, Hagman R, Smidt HJ, Lagerstedt AS, Penning LC, Voorhout G, Hazewinkel HA, Grinwis GC, Creemers LB, Meij BP, Dhert WJ: The dog as an animal model for intervertebral disc degeneration?. Spine. 2012, 37 (5): 351-8. 21544011, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821e5665View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McIlwraith C, Frisbie DD, Kawcak CE: The horse as a model of naturally occurring osteoarthritis. Bone Joint Res. 2012, 1 (11): 297-309. 23610661, 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3srns1GhtQ%3D%3D, 3626203, 10.1302/2046-3758.111.2000132View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.