Skip to main content
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Identification of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the synovial fluid of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a pilot study



Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are a heterogeneous population of innate immune cells with a granulocyte-like or monocyte-like phenotype and a unique ability to suppress T-cell responses. MDSCs have been shown to accumulate in cancer patients, but recent studies suggest that these cells are also present in humans and animals suffering from autoimmune diseases. We previously identified MDSCs in the synovial fluid (SF) of mice with experimental autoimmune arthritis. The goal of the present study was to identify MDSCs in the SF of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).


RA SF cells were studied by flow cytometry using antibodies to MDSC cell surface markers as well as by analysis of cell morphology. The suppressor activity of RA SF cells toward autologous peripheral blood T cells was determined ex vivo. We employed both antigen-nonspecific (anti-CD3/CD28 antibodies) and antigen-specific (allogeneic cells) induction systems to test the effects of RA SF cells on the proliferation of autologous T cells.


SF from RA patients contained MDSC-like cells, the majority of which showed granulocyte (neutrophil)-like phenotype and morphology. RA SF cells significantly suppressed the proliferation of anti-CD3/CD28-stimulated autologous T cells upon co-culture. When compared side by side, RA SF cells had a more profound inhibitory effect on the alloantigen-induced than the anti-CD3/CD28-induced proliferation of autologous T cells.


MDSCs are present among RA SF cells that are commonly regarded as inflammatory neutrophils. Our results suggest that the presence of neutrophil-like MDSCs in the SF is likely beneficial, as these cells have the ability to limit the expansion of joint-infiltrating T cells in RA.

Peer Review reports


Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by inflammatory destruction of peripheral joints[1]. The involvement of autoreactive T cells in RA pathogenesis is supported by a genetic linkage between disease susceptibility and certain MHC class II (HLA-DR) molecules expressed by antigen-presenting cells[2], and by T-cell recognition of citrullinated autoantigens (autoAgs)[3]. Moreover, the presence of isotype-switched antibodies (Abs) against self IgG (i.e., rheumatoid factor) as well as against native and citrullinated self proteins in the majority of RA patients[4] is likely the result of help to Ab-producing B cells provided by autoreactive T helper (Th) cells[5]. T cells, belonging mainly to the Th1 and Th17 subsets, are also present in the rheumatoid joint and are believed to contribute greatly to local tissue damage[1, 6]. However, granulocytes (innate immune cells) constitute the major population of RA synovial fluid (SF) cells[1, 7]. Although SF granulocytes (mainly neutrophils) and monocytes can inflict considerable damage to joint structures through the release of proteolytic enzymes, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and other noxious substances[1], they may also do harm to joint-infiltrating T cells, thereby limiting the local expansion of these T cells.

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are cells of the innate immune system with a remarkable ability to suppress T-cell responses[8]. MDSCs are characterized by an “immature” phenotype on the basis of expression of CD33 (also present in myeloid precursors), and the absence or very low levels of HLA-DR[9, 10]. MDSCs also express the common myeloid marker CD11b, the α chain of the CD11b/CD18 leukocyte integrin heterodimer (also termed αMβ2 integrin or Mac-1), which is found mainly on granulocytes, monocytes, and macrophages[11]. Indeed, MDSCs can be roughly categorized as granulocytic (CD15+ or CD66b+ cells showing polymorphonuclear morphology) and monocytic (CD14+ cells showing mononuclear morphology) subsets[8]. However, MDSCs belonging to these subsets (particularly granulocytic cells) exhibit a high degree of heterogeneity regarding nuclear morphology and the potency and the mechanism of immune suppression[12].

MDSCs were first identified in cancer patients and were shown to accumulate both in the vicinity of tumors and in peripheral blood[10, 13]. The survival and suppressive function of MDSCs are supported by tumor-produced myelopoietic growth factors including granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interleukin (IL)-6, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and others[14, 15], but some of these factors might also be produced at inflammatory sites[1618].

Recent studies suggest that MDSCs are present at increased frequencies in the peripheral blood of patients with autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS)[19] and RA[20] as compared with healthy individuals. We previously identified MDSCs with a predominantly granulocytic phenotype in the SF of mice with proteoglycan-induced arthritis (PGIA, an autoimmune mouse model of RA)[21]. In this pilot study, we show that MDSCs are also present in the SF of RA patients.



Eleven RA patients undergoing therapeutic joint fluid aspiration at two clinics (Section of Rheumatology of the Department of Internal Medicine, and Rheumatology Associates) at Rush University Medical Center participated in the study. Informed consent was obtained from each of the participants. The 11 RA patients all donated SF, and 9 of them also donated blood. The specimens (SF and peripheral blood from RA patients and peripheral blood from a healthy volunteer) were collected through the Knee Injury and Arthritis Repository Study approved by the Institutional Review Board of Rush University Medical Center (Chicago, IL, USA). All patients had established RA according to the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria[22] and substantial joint effusions requiring therapeutic aspiration. The mean age of the RA patients (9 females and 2 males) was 50.3 years (age range: 33–61 years).

Analysis of cell surface marker expression and morphology of RA SF cells

Cells from the SF were pelleted by centrifugation (1000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C) and washed with sterile culture medium. Most of the SF samples had visible fibrin clots (formed in the syringe after joint aspiration). In these cases, clots and large cell aggregates were removed by passing the cell suspension through sterile 70 μm pore-size cell restrainer filters (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA). The cells were then counted and used for phenotypic, morphologic, and functional analyses without further separation. The reason for not separating MDSCs (which involves antibody-based positive selection for CD11b+ myeloid cells followed by sorting for CD33+HLA-DR MDSC-like cells) was that antibodies against CD11b (the α chain of the Mac-1 integrin, present in the majority of RA SF cells[1, 7]) had been reported to interfere with the function of myeloid cells including inhibition of T-cell responses[11, 23]. An aliquot of SF cells was immunostained and processed for flow cytometry. Before immunostaining, Fc receptors were blocked with purified human FcR inhibitor (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) and then the cells were stained with fluorochrome-labeled monoclonal Abs (mAbs) against the following surface markers: CD11b, CD33, HLA-DR, CD14, and CD15 (from eBioscience or BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA). Flow cytometry was performed using a BD FACS Canto II instrument, and data were analyzed with FACS Diva software (BD Flow Cytometry Systems, San Jose, CA, USA). For analysis of cell morphology, an aliquot of SF cells was spun onto glass slides, air dried, and stained with Wright-Giemsa solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Cytospin preparations were viewed and photographed using a Nikon Microphot light microscope (Nikon, Melville, NY, USA) equipped with a digital CCD camera (Coolsnap; RS Photometrics, Tucson, AR, USA).

Cell isolation from human peripheral blood and suppression assays

Venous blood was collected in heparin-containing tubes, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated on a Ficoll density gradient (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA) according to a standard protocol. After extensive washing, PBMCs were suspended in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Hyclone, Logan, UT, USA). Viability (usually >95%) and cell counts for PBMCs as well as for SF cells were determined prior to culture. PBMCs were seeded in 96-well plates previously coated with anti-human-CD3 mAb (1 μg/well; BioLegend) at a density of 1 × 105 cells per well in DMEM containing 10% FBS in the absence or presence of autologous (unseparated) SF cells at a ratio of 1:1. Background controls included PBMCs cultured in uncoated wells, and SF cells seeded in anti-CD3-coated wells. Anti-CD28 mAb (1 μg/well; BioLegend) was added in solution to cells in all anti-CD3-coated wells. The cells (4–6 wells/condition) were cultured for 4 days, and pulsed with [3H]thymidine (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) at 1 μCi/well for the last 18 hours of culture. Isotope incorporation (counts per minute: cpm) into dividing cells was measured in a MicroBeta scintillation counter (Perkin Elmer). As the actual cpm values varied from patient to patient, we calculated the ratios of T-cell proliferation in the presence of SF cells relative to positive control (i.e., in the absence of SF cells) after background correction.

We obtained sufficient numbers of both PBMCs and SF cells from 3 patients (RA #7, 8, and 9) to compare the effects of SF cells on anti-CD3/CD28-induced (non Ag-specific) and alloreactive (Ag-specific) proliferation of T cells side by side. To induce Ag-specific (allogeneic mixed leukocyte) response, RA PBMCs were co-cultured with allogeneic PBMCs from a HLA-mismatched healthy donor in the absence or presence of autologous SF cells at a RA PBMC:normal PBMC:RA SF cell ratio of 1:1:1. The allogeneic cells were treated for 30 min with Mitomycin C (40 μg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) prior to co-culture to inhibit cell division, and proliferation of autologous (RA) T cells was determined on day 5 on the basis of [3H]thymidine incorporation. In this case, cmp values of Mitomycin C-treated allogeneic PBMCs (cultured alone) were included in the background controls.

Isotope incorporation (cpm values) by the cells of this group of 3 RA patients was reasonably similar when the cells were stimulated with anti-CD3/28 or with allogeneic PBMCs or cultured alone. This allowed us to compare the background-corrected cpm values as well as the proliferation ratios under the two different conditions of in vitro stimulation.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics was employed to determine the means ± SEM and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The parametric paired t test and the nonparametric Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test were used (as appropriate) to detect statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences in the cpm values and in the proliferation ratios of RA PBMCs under the different culture conditions. Statistical analysis of data was performed using GraphPad Prism 6 program (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA).


Cells with phenotype and morphology resembling MDSCs are present in the SF of RA patients

Screening for MDSC-like cells was carried out by flow cytometry using SF samples collected from 11 RA patients. We employed a combination of mAbs to MDSC cell surface markers including the common myeloid marker CD11b, the “immature” myeloid cell marker CD33, MHC II (HLA-DR), the monocytic MDSC subset marker CD14, and the granulocytic subset marker CD15[810]. As demonstrated by a representative sample, CD11b+CD33+HLA-DRlo/-CD14CD15+ granulocytic MDSC-like cells were the predominant cell type in RA SF, but a small population of the CD11b+CD33+HLA-DRlo/-CD14+CD15 monocytic subset was also present (Figure 1A). MDSC-like cells constituted ~85% of all SF cells (Figure 1B, left-side graph) and ~95% of these MDSC-like cells belonged to the granulocytic subset (Figure 1B, first bar in the right-side graph) in the samples of the 11 RA patients tested. Despite very similar cell surface marker expression profile in all RA SF samples (Figure 1A-B), the nuclear morphology of the cells varied among the patients, although the dominance of the polymorphonuclear (neutrophil-like) granulocytic subset was evident (Figure 1C).

Figure 1
figure 1

Presence of cells with myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC)-like phenotype and morphology in synovial fluid (SF) from rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. (A) Flow cytometry profile of RA SF cells using a combination of antibodies against the common myeloid marker CD11b, the “immature” myeloid cell marker CD33, MHC class II (HLA-DR), the monocytic subset marker CD14, and the granulocytic subset marker CD15 (gating strategy is indicated by red arrows). The example shown (1 of 11 RA SF samples with similar profiles) demonstrates the dominance of CD11b+CD33lo/hiHLA-DRlo/-CD14CD15+ (granulocytic) MDSC-like cells in RA SF. (B) Using the same gating strategy on the 11 RA SF samples, the mean frequency of MDSC-like myeloid cells was 85.03% (range: 76.1-97.9%) among the SF cells (left-side graph). The granulocytic subset represented 95.2% (range: 72.9-99.7%) and the monocytic subset represented 1.3% (range: 0.1-5.3%) of the MDSC-like SF cell population (bars in right-side graph). The data shown are the means ± SEM. (C) The morphology of SF cells in Wright-Giemsa-stained cytospin preparations from 3 RA patients also indicated the dominance of the polymorphonuclear granulocytic subset, although the shape of the nuclei of these neutrophil-like cells varied among the patients.

RA SF cells significantly suppress the anti-CD3/CD28-induced proliferation of autologous T cells

Lechner et al.[24] reported that monocytic MDSCs, generated in vitro from human PBMCs in the presence of GM-CSF and IL-6, were able to suppress the anti-CD3/CD28-induced proliferation of autologous T cells. To determine whether the MDSC-like cells that we identified in RA SF, indeed, had suppressive properties, we stimulated T cells (present in PBMC) with anti-CD3/CD28 mAbs in the absence and presence of SF cells from the same patients. Anti-CD3/CD28-stimulated T cells in PBMC proliferated less well in the presence than in the absence of autologous SF cells as indicated by the difference in total [3H]thymidine incorporation (Figure 2A, condition “a” versus condition “b”). Isotope incorporation (cpm) by unstimulated PBMCs or anti-CD3/CD28-treated SF cells (Figure 2A, conditions “c” and “d”, respectively, as background controls) was low, but still detectable. We tested PBMCs and SF cells from a total of 9 RA patients in the same in vitro system, and found that SF cells from all of these patients suppressed anti-CD3/CD28-induced cell proliferation. Since total isotope incorporation by PBMCs and PBMC-SF cell co-cultures as well as background cpm values (conditions “c” and “d”) varied from patient to patient, we calculated the background-corrected proliferation ratios for the 9 patients tested. As shown in Figure 2B, the SF cell-mediated suppression of anti-CD3/CD28-induced T-cell proliferation was statistically significant (p = 0.0039, 95% CI = 0.4682-0.7495).

Figure 2
figure 2

Suppression of anti-CD3/CD28-induced polyclonal proliferation of autologous peripheral blood T cells by RA SF cells. (A) Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) stimulated with anti-CD3/CD28 monoclonal antibodies (Abs) were cultured in the absence (condition “a”) or presence (“b”) of SF cells (SFC) from the same RA patient (RA #3). Background controls included PBMCs cultured without anti-CD3/CD28 Abs (“c”) and SF cells cultured with anti-CD3/CD28 Abs (“d”). The results shown are the means ± SEM of isotope incorporation (counts per minute, cpm) by the proliferating cells (6 wells per condition). As the actual cpm values at all of the listed conditions varied from patient to patient, we calculated the proliferation ratio (with background correction) for each RA patient using the formula: [b − (c + d)]/(a − c), where the positive control (a - c) was set to 1. (B) As indicated by the proliferation ratios, the anti-CD3/CD28-induced proliferation of autologous PBMCs (light gray bar) was significantly suppressed in the presence of SF cells (black bar). The results shown are the means ± SEM of background-corrected proliferation ratios (**p < 0.01; Wilcoxon matched-pair signed rank test; n = 9 patients).

SF cells from the same RA patients are more potent in suppressing the Ag-specific than the anti-CD3/CD28-induced proliferation of autologous T cells

We reported previously that MDSCs present in the SF of the arthritic joints of mice with PGIA potently suppressed Ag (human PG)-induced T-cell proliferation, but were ineffective against anti-CD3/CD28-induced proliferation[21]. In this study, using allogeneic PBMC as a source of Ag, we directly compared the effects of RA SF cells on the anti-CD3/CD28-induced versus alloAg-induced proliferation of autologous T cells obtained from the same patients. Side-by-side comparison of cell cultures of these RA patients (RA #7, 8, 9) demonstrated significant (p = 0.0389) but moderate activity of SF cells in inhibiting the robust proliferation of anti-CD3/CD28-stimulated autologous T cells (Figure 3A), and also significant (p = 0.0087) and more effective suppression of the Ag-induced (and more modest) proliferation of the same T cells (Figure 3B). Since the SF cell populations from the same RA patients exhibited significantly (p = 0.0413) different degrees of suppression under the two different culture conditions (Figure 3C), these results also suggested that inhibition of T-cell proliferation was not simply due to cytotoxic substances released from degranulating, dying, or apoptotic SF cells upon culture.

Figure 3
figure 3

Comparison of the suppressive effects of RA SF cells on the anti-CD3/CD28-induced and alloantigen-induced proliferation of autologous T cells. (A) Isotope incorporation (cpm) by anti-CD3/CD28 Ab-stimulated PBMCs (light blue bar) was moderately, but significantly reduced in the presence (dark blue bar) of SF cells (SFC) from 3 RA patients (RA #7, 8, 9). (B) Allogeneic PBMC-induced proliferation of PBMCs from the same 3 patients (orange bar) was greatly reduced in the presence of autologous SF cells (dark red bar). The data shown in panels A and B are the means ± SEM of background-corrected cpm values (4 wells per condition) (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; Paired t test). (C) Comparison of the ratios of anti-CD3/CD28-induced (dark blue bar) and allogeneic PBMC-induced (dark red bar) proliferation of RA PBMCs in the presence of autologous SFC in the 3 RA patients (cpm values shown in panels A and B) indicated that SF cells from the same patients were more efficient in suppressing the allogeneic PBMC-induced than the anti-CD3/CD28-induced proliferation of autologous T cells. The data are the means ± SEM of background-corrected proliferation ratios (*p < 0.05; Paired t test).


MDCSs have been gaining increasing attention in recent years as important modulators of adaptive immune responses in various diseases[8]. In cancer patients, accumulation of MDSCs around the tumors as well as at the periphery can be detrimental, as these cells suppress tumor Ag-specific T cells, thus weakening anti-tumor immunity[13, 25]. On the contrary, MDSC-mediated suppression of T-cell responses can be beneficial in pathologic conditions characterized by the unopposed activation of the adaptive immune system such as organ transplant rejection or autoimmune diseases[12]. Indeed, adoptive transfer of MDSCs in mouse models of human autoimmune disorders, including MS[19], type I diabetes[26], and RA[27], was followed by reduction in disease severity in the MDSC recipient mice.

Jiao et al.[20] reported increased frequency of MDSC-like cells in the blood of patients with RA as compared with healthy individuals, and also found a negative correlation between the frequencies of circulating MDSC-like and Th17 cells in RA patients. Unfortunately, MDSC-like cells were defined by phenotypic marker expression only, and the suppressor activity of these cells toward T cells was not tested in that study[20]. For the first time to our knowledge, here we show that MDSC-like cells are also present in the SF of RA patients. These cells are true MDSCs, as they are capable of suppressing the ex vivo induced proliferation of autologous T cells.

With regard to phenotype, we have found that the majority of MDSC-like RA SF cells belongs the granulocytic CD11b+CD33+HLA-DRlo/-CD14CD15+ subset with neutrophil morphology; only a very small population of the CD11b+CD33+HLA-DRlo/-CD14+CD15 monocytic subset could be identified in the patients’ SF samples. There is an ongoing debate about an association between phenotype and function, as both granulocytic and monocytic MDSCs have been reported to exhibit immune suppression in a disease- and tissue site-dependent manner[12, 28]. Moreover, within the granulocytic subset, suppressive cells have been identified among both “immature” neutrophils (with band-shaped nuclei) and mature neutrophils (with segmented or even hyper-segmented nuclei) in humans[29]. As we described earlier, SF cells harvested from the arthritic joints of mice with PGIA were also dominated by granulocytic cells with neutrophil morphology, and these SF cells retained their immune suppressive potential after removal of the minor monocytic MDSC subset[21]. In the collagen-induced mouse model of RA, granulocytic MDSCs isolated from the spleens of arthritic mice suppressed T-cell proliferation in vitro, and reduced the severity of joint inflammation upon adoptive transfer in vivo[27]. Taken together, these observations and our findings described in this study suggest that immune suppressive cells with the phenotypic and morphologic characteristics of neutrophils are present in the SF of RA patients.

Similar to SF cells collected from mice with PGIA[21], we found that SF cells from RA patients were much more potent in suppressing Ag-specific than anti-CD3/CD28-induced proliferation of autologous T cells. However, unlike mouse SF cells, SF MDSCs from RA patients were also able to exert a significant inhibitory effect on the vigorous proliferation of anti-CD3/CD28-stimulated T cells. These observations implicate SF MDSCs as non-selective suppressors of T-cell expansion, and also suggest that the difference in suppressive potency observed in the Ag-specific versus non-specific systems might simply be due to the difference in the magnitude of the response of T cells to these stimuli.

The mechanisms of MDSC-mediated suppression include depletion of L-arginine by arginase-1, synthesis of nitric oxide (NO) by inducible NO synthase, and production of various oxygen radicals[8], all of which can have negative effects on the cell cycle and CD3-related signaling in T cells[29]. We found that the primary mechanism of immune suppression by mouse granulocytic SF cells involved NO production[21]. The limited amount of patient samples available for this study did not allow us to investigate the suppressive mechanisms employed by RA SF cells. However, elevated concentrations of nitrite (formed from NO) have been reported in the SF of RA patients[30], suggesting the possibility that NO production is one of the mechanisms SF MDSCs use to suppress T-cell proliferation.

Myelopoiesis-supporting factors such as GM-CSF, G-CSF, and IL-6 have been implicated in the induction and survival of MDSCs[8, 17, 24, 31]. Notably, these growth factors are present at high levels in the SF of RA patients[18], thereby providing a milieu in which MDSCs can thrive. On the other hand, the widely observed “hypo-responsiveness” of RA SF T cells to mitogenic stimuli (as compared to the normal responsiveness of blood T cells from the same patient)[1, 32] might, at least in part, be related to the long-term exposure of T cells to MDSCs within the joint exudate. Moreover, although CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells might be present in RA SF[5, 33], the inflammatory environment greatly reduces the capacity of these regulatory T cells to inhibit the activity and expansion of effector T cells ex vivo or within the joint[5, 34].

In the collagen-induced mouse model of RA, intravenous (systemic) transfer of spleen-derived MDSCs was followed by a decrease in the number of CD4+ T cells and reduced arthritis severity in the recipient mice[27]. Conversely, in vivo depletion of MDSCs prevented the spontaneous resolution of joint inflammation[27]. We propose that MDSCs present in RA SF, while inflicting collateral damage to joint tissues, also serve as negative regulators of local T-cell expansion in an attempt to break the vicious cycle of autoimmunity and inflammation.


In this study, we show for the first time that MDSCs are present in the SF of RA patients. The majority of RA SF MDSCs exhibits neutrophil phenotype and morphology, similarly to MDSCs we identified earlier in the SF of mice with autoimmune arthritis. The suppression mediated by RA SF cells appears to be non-selective as these MDSCs potently suppress both the anti-CD3/CD28 Ab-induced and alloAg-induced proliferation of autologous blood T cells. We suggest that RA SF MDSCs are able to limit the expansion of joint-infiltrating (and most likely pathogenic) T cells. This pilot study represents the first step of investigations into the role of MDSCs (present in the inflamed joints and perhaps at other sites) in controlling autoimmune T-cell responses in RA.







Confidence interval


Counts per minute


Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium


Fetal bovine serum


Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor


Granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor


Human leukocyte antigen-DR




Monoclonal antibody


Myeloid-derived suppressor cell


Major histocompatibility complex class II


Multiple sclerosis


Nitric oxide


Peripheral blood mononuclear cell


Proteoglycan (cartilage aggrecan)


PG-induced arthritis


Rheumatoid arthritis


Standard error of the mean


Synovial fluid


SF cell


T helper.


  1. Firestein GS: Rheumatoid Arthritis: Etiology and Pathogeneis of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Kelley’s Textbook of Rheumatology. Edited by: Ruddy S, Harris ED, Sledge CB, Kelley WN. 2005, Philadelphia, PA: W.B.Saunders Co, 996-1045. 7

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kurko J, Besenyei T, Laki J, Glant TT, Mikecz K, Szekanecz Z: Genetics of rheumatoid arthritis - a comprehensive review. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2013, 45: 170-179. 10.1007/s12016-012-8346-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Law SC, Street S, Yu CH, Capini C, Ramnoruth S, Nel HJ, van Gorp E, Hyde C, Lau K, Pahau H, Purcell AW, Thomas R: T cell autoreactivity to citrullinated autoantigenic peptides in rheumatoid arthritis patients carrying HLA-DRB1 shared epitope alleles. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012, 14: R118-10.1186/ar3848.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Szodoray P, Szabo Z, Kapitany A, Gyetvai A, Lakos G, Szanto S, Szucs G, Szekanecz Z: Anti-citrullinated protein/peptide autoantibodies in association with genetic and environmental factors as indicators of disease outcome in rheumatoid arthritis. Autoimmun Rev. 2010, 9: 140-143. 10.1016/j.autrev.2009.04.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kobezda T, Ghassemi-Nejad S, Mikecz K, Glant TT, Szekanecz Z: Of mice and men: how animal models advance our understanding of T-cell function in RA. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2014, 10: 160-170. 10.1038/nrrheum.2013.205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Panayi GS, Lanchbury JS, Kingsley GH: The importance of the T cell in initiating and maintaining the chronic synovitis of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1992, 35: 729-735. 10.1002/art.1780350702.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bjelle A, Norberg B, Sjogren G: The cytology of joint exudates in rheumatoid arthritis. Morphology and preparation techniques. Scand J Rheumatol. 1982, 11: 124-128. 10.3109/03009748209098176.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Greten TF, Manns MP, Korangy F: Myeloid derived suppressor cells in human diseases. Int Immunopharmacol. 2011, 11: 802-807. 10.1016/j.intimp.2011.01.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ugel S, Delpozzo F, Desantis G, Papalini F, Simonato F, Sonda N, Zilio S, Bronte V: Therapeutic targeting of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2009, 9: 470-481. 10.1016/j.coph.2009.06.014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Serafini P, Borrello I, Bronte V: Myeloid suppressor cells in cancer: recruitment, phenotype, properties, and mechanisms of immune suppression. Semin Cancer Biol. 2006, 16: 53-65. 10.1016/j.semcancer.2005.07.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lowell CA, Berton G: Integrin signal transduction in myeloid leukocytes. J Leukoc Biol. 1999, 65: 313-320.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gabrilovich DI, Nagaraj S: Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as regulators of the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009, 9: 162-174. 10.1038/nri2506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Nagaraj S, Gabrilovich DI: Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in human cancer. Cancer J. 2010, 16: 348-353. 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3181eb3358.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lechner MG, Megiel C, Russell SM, Bingham B, Arger N, Woo T, Epstein AL: Functional characterization of human CD33+ and CD11b+ myeloid-derived suppressor cell subsets induced from peripheral blood mononuclear cells co-cultured with a diverse set of human tumor cell lines. J Transl Med. 2011, 9: 90-10.1186/1479-5876-9-90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Richards MK, Liu F, Iwasaki H, Akashi K, Link DC: Pivotal role of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in the development of progenitors in the common myeloid pathway. Blood. 2003, 102: 3562-3568. 10.1182/blood-2003-02-0593.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamilton JA: GM-CSF in inflammation and autoimmunity. Trends Immunol. 2002, 23: 403-408. 10.1016/S1471-4906(02)02260-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Simon HU: Neutrophil apoptosis pathways and their modifications in inflammation. Immunol Rev. 2003, 193: 101-110. 10.1034/j.1600-065X.2003.00038.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wright HL, Bucknall RC, Moots RJ, Edwards SW: Analysis of SF and plasma cytokines provides insights into the mechanisms of inflammatory arthritis and may predict response to therapy. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012, 51: 451-459. 10.1093/rheumatology/ker338.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ioannou M, Alissafi T, Lazaridis I, Deraos G, Matsoukas J, Gravanis A, Mastorodemos V, Plaitakis A, Sharpe A, Boumpas D, Verginis P: Crucial role of granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the regulation of central nervous system autoimmune disease. J Immunol. 2012, 188: 1136-1146. 10.4049/jimmunol.1101816.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jiao Z, Hua S, Wang W, Wang H, Gao J, Wang X: Increased circulating myeloid-derived suppressor cells correlated negatively with Th17 cells in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol. 2013, 42: 85-90. 10.3109/03009742.2012.716450.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Egelston C, Kurko J, Besenyei T, Tryniszewska B, Rauch TA, Glant TT, Mikecz K: Suppression of dendritic cell maturation and T cell proliferation by synovial fluid myeloid cells from mice with autoimmune arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2012, 64: 3179-3188. 10.1002/art.34494.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO, Birnbaum NS, Burmester GR, Bykerk VP, Cohen MD, Combe B, Costenbader KH, Dougados M, Emery P, Ferraccioli G, Hazes JM, Hobbs K, Huizinga TW, Kavanaugh A, Kay J, Kvien TK, Laing T, Mease P, Menard HA, Moreland LW, Naden RL, Pincus T, Smolen JS, Stanislawska-Biernat E, Symmons D, et al: 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010, 69: 1580-1588. 10.1136/ard.2010.138461.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pillay J, Kamp VM, van E H, Visser T, Tak T, Lammers JW, Ulfman LH, Leenen LP, Pickkers P, Koenderman L: A subset of neutrophils in human systemic inflammation inhibits T cell responses through Mac-1. J Clin Invest. 2012, 122: 327-336. 10.1172/JCI57990.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lechner MG, Liebertz DJ, Epstein AL: Characterization of cytokine-induced myeloid-derived suppressor cells from normal human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. J Immunol. 2010, 185: 2273-2284. 10.4049/jimmunol.1000901.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Nagaraj S, Gupta K, Pisarev V, Kinarsky L, Sherman S, Kang L, Herber DL, Schneck J, Gabrilovich DI: Altered recognition of antigen is a mechanism of CD8+ T cell tolerance in cancer. Nat Med. 2007, 13: 828-835. 10.1038/nm1609.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Yin B, Ma G, Yen CY, Zhou Z, Wang GX, Divino CM, Casares S, Chen SH, Yang WC, Pan PY: Myeloid-derived suppressor cells prevent type 1 diabetes in murine models. J Immunol. 2010, 185: 5828-5834. 10.4049/jimmunol.0903636.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Fujii W, Ashihara E, Hirai H, Nagahara H, Kajitani N, Fujioka K, Murakami K, Seno T, Yamamoto A, Ishino H, Kohno M, Maekawa T, Kawahito Y: Myeloid-derived suppressor cells play crucial roles in the regulation of mouse collagen-induced arthritis. J Immunol. 2013, 191: 1073-1081. 10.4049/jimmunol.1203535.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Youn JI, Gabrilovich DI: The biology of myeloid-derived suppressor cells: the blessing and the curse of morphological and functional heterogeneity. Eur J Immunol. 2010, 40: 2969-2975. 10.1002/eji.201040895.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Pillay J, Tak T, Kamp VM, Koenderman L: Immune suppression by neutrophils and granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells: similarities and differences. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013, 70: 3813-3827. 10.1007/s00018-013-1286-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Farrell AJ, Blake DR, Palmer RM, Moncada S: Increased concentrations of nitrite in synovial fluid and serum samples suggest increased nitric oxide synthesis in rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 1992, 51: 1219-1222. 10.1136/ard.51.11.1219.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Dolcetti L, Peranzoni E, Ugel S, Marigo I, Fernandez GA, Mesa C, Geilich M, Winkels G, Traggia E, Casati A, Grassi F, Bronte V: Hierarchy of immunosuppressive strength among myeloid-derived suppressor cell subsets is determined by GM-CSF. Eur J Immunol. 2010, 40: 22-35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cope AP: Studies of T-cell activation in chronic inflammation. Arthritis Res. 2002, 4 (Suppl 3): S197-S211. 10.1186/ar557.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Cao D, van Vollenhoven R, Klareskog L, Trollmo C, Malmstrom V: CD25brightCD4+ regulatory T cells are enriched in inflamed joints of patients with chronic rheumatic disease. Arthritis Res Ther. 2004, 6: R335-R346. 10.1186/ar1192.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Wehrens EJ, Prakken BJ, van Wijk F: T cells out of control–impaired immune regulation in the inflamed joint. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2013, 9: 34-42. 10.2174/1573397111309010009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

Download references


The authors thank Dr. Larry Thomas for help with the cytospin preparations. This study was supported by grants AR062332 and AR064206 from the National Institute of Health, and an award from the Grainger Foundation (Lake Forest, IL, USA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zoltán Szekanecz or Katalin Mikecz.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

JK designed and performed most of the experiments, analyzed and interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. AV participated in the collection of cells, performed flow cytometry, and analyzed the data. TTG participated in the collection and processing of cells, interpreted the data, and critically reviewed the manuscript. CRS organized the collection of human specimens, interpreted the data, and critically reviewed the manuscript. RSK provided RA specimens and patient information, and critically reviewed the manuscript. AN obtained informed consent from RA patients, and was involved in the collection and processing of specimens. ZS provided expert advice regarding the analysis of RA SF cells, interpreted the data, and critically reviewed the manuscript. KM coordinated the experiments, drafted the figures, and wrote the final version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Authors’ original file for figure 3

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit

The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kurkó, J., Vida, A., Glant, T.T. et al. Identification of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the synovial fluid of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a pilot study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 15, 281 (2014).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: