- Technical advance
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
A low morbidity surgical approach to the sheep femoral trochlea
© Orth and Madry; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
- Received: 26 May 2012
- Accepted: 31 December 2012
- Published: 3 January 2013
The ovine stifle joint is an important location for investigations on the repair of articular cartilage defects in preclinical large animals. The classical medial parapatellar approach to the femoral trochlea is hazardous because of the high risk of postoperative patellar luxation. Here, we describe a low morbidity surgical exposure of the ovine trochlea without the necessity for intraoperative patellar luxation.
Bilateral surgical exposure of the femoral trochlea of the sheep stifle joint was performed using the classical medial parapatellar approach with intraoperative lateral patellar luxation and transection of the medial patellar retinaculum in 28 ovine stifle joints. A low morbidity approach was performed bilaterally in 116 joints through a mini-arthrotomy without the need to transect the medial patellar retinaculum or the oblique medial vastus muscle nor surgical patellar luxation. Postoperatively, all 72 animals were monitored to exclude patellar luxations and deep wound infections.
The novel approach could be performed easily in all joints and safely exposed the distal two-thirds of the medial and lateral trochlear facet. No postoperative patellar luxations were observed compared to a postoperative patellar luxation rate of 25% experienced with the classical medial parapatellar approach and a re-luxation rate of 80% following revision surgery. No signs of lameness, wound infections, or empyema were observed for both approaches.
The mini-arthrotomy presented here yields good exposure of the distal ovine femoral trochlea with a lower postoperative morbidity than the classical medial parapatellar approach. It is therefore suitable to create articular cartilage defects on the femoral trochlea without the risk of postoperative patellar luxation.
- In vivo
Preclinical models of articular cartilage repair are of paramount importance to translate experimental approaches into the clinical situation . The sheep or goat stifle joint is one preferred model for those studies [2–4] as it combines unique advantages over other species, such as similarities in the repair capacity of articular cartilage defects and similar biomechanical properties including long bone dimensions and body weight to humans [5, 6]. The mechanical loading environment occurring in sheep and goats is well understood [7–9] and they are easier to handle than pigs or horses, including anesthesia .
From a human articular cartilage repair standpoint, the trochlea is an important location to create cartilage defects , since the clinical outcome of defects at this anatomical site is unfavorable compared with lesions in the femoral condyles . Moreover, the sheep trochlea is plane with a large surface, making it an ideal site to study articular cartilage repair in a standardized manner.
The surgical exposure of the trochlea by the classical medial parapatellar approach involves the intraoperative luxation of the patella. While easy to perform in patients , a significant rate of postoperative patellar luxations may occur in sheep or goats when applying the classical approach. Such patellar luxations are based on the different anatomy of the ovine and caprine stifle joint when compared to the human knee: in extension, the patella is located proximal to the trochlea and glides within the trochlear groove only in flexion of the stifle joint. This special feature of the more posteriorly angled trochlea, in combination with a relatively small lateral femoral condyle, makes complications very likely if a medial parapatellar incision and lateral patellar luxation is chosen. In addition, the ovine medial retinaculum is mostly stronger and more difficult to repair after transection. Besides, even if no patellar luxation occurs, osteoarthritis may frequently result from using the classical approach, possibly jeopardizing surgical results considerably .
Here, we describe a low morbidity surgical exposure of the ovine femoral trochlea with reduced risk for patellar luxation.
Surgical exposure of the femoral trochlea of the sheep stifle joint was performed by the same surgeon (HM) using either a standard medial parapatellar approach with luxation of the patella (n = 14 sheep) or a novel mini-arthrotomy without intraoperative patellar luxation (n = 58). All sheep (n = 72) were allowed full weight-bearing and full range of motion immediately postoperatively. Animals operated for previous [15, 16] or unpublished studies of experimental articular cartilage repair served as subjects to describe the surgical approaches.
Healthy, skeletally mature, Merino ewes aged between 2 and 4 years (mean body weight [BW], 70 ± 20 kg) received water ad libitum and were fed a standard diet. Osteoarthritis was excluded on preoperative X-rays of the stifle joints. All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the national legislation on protection of animals and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH Publication 85–23, Rev 1985) and were approved by the local governmental animal care committee.
Following a 12-hour fast, animals were sedated with 2% Rompun (Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany) at 0.05 mg/kg BW and endotracheally intubated after intravenous administration of 20 ml of 2% propofol (AstraZeneca, Wedel, Germany) and carprofen (1.4 mg/kg BW; Pfizer, Berlin, Germany). Anesthesia was maintained by inhalation of 1.5% isoflurane (Baxter, Unterschleißheim, Germany) and intravenous administration of propofol (6–12 mg/kg BW/h). At the day of the operation and the first or second postoperative day, respectively, animals routinely received analgesia (carprofen; 1.4 mg/kg BW; Pfizer, Berlin, Germany) and antibiotics (amoxicillin clavulanate; 30 mg/kg BW; Pfizer).
Classical medial parapatellar approach
Prior to development of the novel less-invasive surgical approach, exposure of the ovine femoral trochlea has been performed by the use of the classical medial parapatellar approach in 28 stifle joints in 14 sheep.
According to the report of Allen et al., a medial parapatellar skin incision was made from 5 cm proximal to the patella to a point 5 cm distal to the tibial tubercle. With the proximal incision, the oblique medial vastus muscle often had to be incised to allow for luxation of the patella. The joint capsule was opened medial and parallel to the patellar tendon with transection of the medial patellar retinaculum. The patella was luxated laterally and retracted by the use of a Hohmann retractor. For closure of the capsule, absorbable sutures were applied (Vicryl; size 2; Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany). The subcutaneous tissue and the skin incision were closed using Vicryl size 2/0 and 2, respectively. Simple interrupted suture patterns were applied for all anatomical layers. Aluminium bandage spray was applied to the wounds.
Novel less-invasive approach
The novel approach to the ovine femoral trochlea was applied in 116 arthrotomies in 58 sheep.
Animal positioning and draping
The surgical wounds (length 4–5 cm; Figure 1F) were closed in layers. First, the medial extensor mechanism (capsule and patellar tendon) was meticulously reconstructed. This suture is of paramount importance with regard to the prevention of postoperative patellar luxations. Therefore, we chose the non-absorbable Ethibond suture (size 6; Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany) to ascertain a biomechanically stable reconstruction of the extensor mechanism. Additional Ethibond sutures (size 3) served for tight closure of the capsule (Figure 1F). The intermediate soft tissue layer, the subcutaneous tissue, and the skin were readapted using absorbable sutures (Vicryl; size 2, size 2/0, size 2, respectively; Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany). Simple interrupted suture patterns were applied for all anatomical layers. Finally, an aluminium bandage spray was applied to the wounds (Figure 1G).
All 58 animals were continuously monitored over 6 months to exclude postoperative patellar luxations, deep wound infection, or empyema.
Grades of patellar luxation in sheep
Patella at examination
manual by digital pressure
reduced in extension and luxated in flexion
manual by digital pressure or spontaneous in flexion
manual by digital pressure or spontaneous in extension
resolvable skipping lameness
manual by digital pressure
Deep wound infections and empyema
All stifle joints were examined clinically for redness, hyperthermia, swelling, and secretion and body temperature was measured daily over the first 3 weeks and weekly for the remaining observation period.
Classical medial parapatellar approach
Novel less-invasive approach
The surgical procedure was performed bilaterally in 116 joints (n = 58 sheep). Exposure of the trochlea was always successful. Anesthesia was uneventful. There were no intraoperative complications. Surgical time was between 15 and 20 min per joint. The sheep recovered quickly, as indicated by their rise already at 1–2 hours and the full weightbearing on both operated hindlimbs 24 hours postoperatively. Upon clinical examination, no signs of lameness (assessable in bilaterally operated animals only upon full weightbearing), deep wound infections, or empyema were observed at any time point. Skin incisions healed 2 weeks after surgery. No patellar luxations were observed in any of the sheep operated with the novel surgical approach.
The authors describe a less-invasive surgical approach to the ovine stifle joint, allowing for a low morbidity exposure of the femoral trochlea without the need for intraoperative patellar luxation. This approach was applied in 116 stifle joints and is technically easy, safe, and yields good exposure of the distal two thirds of the trochlea. Surgical benefits include the preservation of important structures, such as the medial patellar retinaculum, the oblique medial vastus muscle, and of patellar blood supply. Importantly, postoperative patellar luxation never occurred. This approach therefore may be valuable to create articular cartilage defects on the ovine femoral trochlea.
The sheep or goat stifle joint is a key animal model reflecting many features of the human knee, including the relative sizes of articulating bones, the straight leg axis, or the existence of cruciate ligaments, menisci, asymmetrical collateral ligaments, and a bicondylar distal femur [2–4, 6]. Compared to other large animals such as horses, sheep and goats have the advantages of easy handling and cost effectiveness . However, goats can prove more difficult to house than sheep . Besides, although the articular cartilage is thicker in goats (up to 1.9 mm) than in sheep (0.3-0.7 mm) , goats are more susceptible to spontaneous osteoarthritis . Therefore, we here applied sheep rather than the goat model.
Regarding articular cartilage defects, the sheep has been used as animal model for partial-  and full-thickness [21–23] chondral and osteochondral defects [11, 24, 25]. Several studies also used the ovine stifle joint to test implants  and as a model for osteoarthritis [27, 28], cruciate ligament reconstruction [29, 30], or meniscus repair . However, the classical medial parapatellar arthrotomy includes surgical patellar luxation, unnecessarily increasing the risk for postoperative complications such as patellar luxation. With a view of animal welfare and protection, a less-invasive surgical approach with reduced risk for patellar luxation is required.
To date, most studies on articular cartilage repair in sheep used the medial femoral condyle [21–25, 32–41], perhaps because of its uncomplicated surgical exposure. Despite an improved histological grading of chondral defects at the ovine trochlea compared with the condyle after 8, 10, and 12 weeks , the trochlea is underrepresented in these investigations [11, 34]. This may in part be due to the decreased thickness of normal cartilage at the trochlea compared with the femoral condyles  or the tibial plateau , although proteoglycan levels of trochlear and condylar cartilage are similar [44, 45]. Yet, due to its plane and large cartilaginous surface, the ovine trochlea is suitable for cartilage repair studies. The here described surgical approach not only allows for a safe exposure of this important anatomical site, but also gives access to the medial and lateral femoral condyle and both menisci.
The preclinical sheep model is prone to rather high postoperative complication rates which might not always be reported. These include wound dehiscence or infections due to non-anatomical wound closures ignoring the layered structure of the soft tissue, the reduced antiseptic environment caused by the nature of the animal model itself, missing routing in draping, insufficient surgical experience and knowledge of the anatomical structures, or extended operation times . Besides, complication rates in the sheep model are additionally increased by the fact that reduced loading of the operated hindlimb can only be achieved by extended measures such as applying splints, harnesses , plaster casts , or hanging the animals in slings .
In the present report, patellar luxations only occurred following the classical medial approach with intraoperative patellar luxation and transection of the medial patellar retinaculum. Thus, although considered a standard approach for clinical and preclinical purposes , we strongly advise against this erroneous surgical technique in future translational animal experiments and in veterinary surgery. This serious complication may additionally be provoked by the specific anatomy of the ovine patellofemoral joint (small lateral femoral condyle, patella located outside and proximal to the trochlear groove in extension, proximolateral to distomedial angle of the trochlear groove ), together with the high loading forces resulting from an unprotected rise from the lying down position . Besides, the high luxation rate following the classical approach may possibly be ascribed in part to a genetic predisposition for patellar luxation in sheep . Altogether, these factors may favour a unilateral experimental set-up, allowing for at least one pain-free hindleg to facilitate postoperative rising and standing.
Clinical signs of patellar luxation include persistent, abnormal hindleg carriage with the stifle joint flexed, lameness, and -especially in bilateral luxations- crouching, bowlegged or knock-kneed stance (Table 1), and may usually be perceived upon postoperative weightbearing (circa 24 hours after surgery). The suspected diagnosis can be affirmed by clinical examination: When luxated, the patella is palpable laterally, with a grinding sensation when being mobilized and a snapping sound upon reduction. Although not necessary routinely, additional radiological examination by X-ray (anteroposterior (Figure 3) or flexed dorsoproximal-dorsodistal radiographic views ) may confirm the diagnosis. In this report, the initial treatment of these grade II-III luxations was non-operatively, but as lameness and non-weightbearing worsened, soft tissue revision surgery (capsular and retinacular imbrication) was performed. In order to preserve the femoral trochlea, osseous reconstruction procedures initially developed for the canine model  such as trochleoplasty  or tibial tuberosity transposition  were avoided here. Intriguingly, the postoperative rate of re-luxations was of 80%. In good agreement, failure rates of 80% and 50% have been reported for the surgical treatment of patellar luxations in llamas  and dogs , respectively. Thus, although the mild temperament and relatively small body size of sheep generally renders them amenable for the operative treatment of orthopedic problems [51, 52, 54], we do not recommend revision surgery in the case of postoperative patellar luxations in this animal model.
Interestingly, absorbable suture materials were degraded much faster in sheep than in humans. For the closure of the joint capsule, the relatively high concentrations of inflammatory cytokines  and activated matrix metalloproteinase-2  of the ovine synovial fluid might explain this finding, while the elevated mean body temperature of sheep (38-40°C) compared to humans [56, 57] may contribute to a generally faster degradation of absorbable foreign materials. Therefore, although applied in routine protocols for knee arthrotomies in patients and in various sheep studies [36, 42, 48, 58–60], Vicryl and other absorbable sutures are inadvisable for the reconstruction of the biomechanically important extensor mechanism. In veterinary medicine, monofilament and thicker absorbable sutures are used successfully for this purpose . Here, we applied non-absorbable suture materials, but the potential risk of postoperative fistula formation has to be acknowledged and further evaluated in future investigations. Regarding the suture pattern, interrupted sutures are preferable compared to continuous sutures .
Patellar luxation is a frequent complication when the classical medial parapatellar arthrotomy is performed in sheep. Its diagnosis can be made be simple physical examination -X-ray is not necessary for its confirmation. The presented approach to the femoral trochlea avoids the need for intraoperative surgical patellar luxation. It is technically easy, safe, and yields excellent exposure of the distal part of the trochlea. Having used this technique in 116 arthrotomies, patellar luxation never occurred. However, the surgeon still must be mindful of this severe complication, especially when the proximal incision is carried our too far, extending into the oblique medial vastus muscle or transecting the medial patellar retinaculum.
PO is working as a resident at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saarland University Medical Center, and as a postdoctoral fellow at the Center of Experimental Orthopaedics, Saarland University. HM is working as a registrar at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saarland University Medical Center, and is the director of the Center of Experimental Orthopaedics, Saarland University.
Supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG MA 2363/1–3).
- Reinholz GG, Lu L, Saris DB, Yaszemski MJ, O'Driscoll SW: Animal models for cartilage reconstruction. Biomaterials. 2004, 25: 1511-1521. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00498-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martini L, Fini M, Giavaresi G, Giardino R: Sheep model in orthopedic research: a literature review. Comp Med. 2001, 51: 292-299.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rorvik AM, Teige J: Unstable stifles without clinical or radiographic osteoarthritis in young goats: an experimental study. Acta Vet Scand. 1996, 37: 265-272.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Murphy JM, Fink DJ, Hunziker EB, Barry FP: Stem cell therapy in a caprine model of osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2003, 48: 3464-3474. 10.1002/art.11365.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Newman E, Turner AS, Wark JD: The potential of sheep for the study of osteopenia: current status and comparison with other animal models. Bone. 1995, 16: 277S-284S.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Osterhoff G, Loffler S, Steinke H, Feja C, Josten C, Hepp P: Comparative anatomical measurements of osseous structures in the ovine and human knee. Knee. 2011, 18: 98-103. 10.1016/j.knee.2010.02.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Taylor WR, Ehrig RM, Duda GN, Schell H, Seebeck P, Heller MO: On the influence of soft tissue coverage in the determination of bone kinematics using skin markers. J Orthop Res. 2005, 23: 726-734. 10.1016/j.orthres.2005.02.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Taylor WR, Ehrig RM, Heller MO, Schell H, Seebeck P, Duda GN: Tibio-femoral joint contact forces in sheep. J Biomech. 2006, 39: 791-798. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.02.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bylski-Austrow DI, Malumed J, Meade T, Grood ES: Knee joint contact pressure decreases after chronic meniscectomy relative to the acutely meniscectomized joint: a mechanical study in the goat. J Orthop Res. 1993, 11: 796-804. 10.1002/jor.1100110604.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kitchen H: Sheep as animal models in biomedical research. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1977, 170: 615-619.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kandel RA, Grynpas M, Pilliar R, Lee J, Wang J, Waldman S, Zalzal P, Hurtig M: Repair of osteochondral defects with biphasic cartilage-calcium polyphosphate constructs in a sheep model. Biomaterials. 2006, 27: 4120-4131. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.03.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kreuz PC, Steinwachs MR, Erggelet C, Krause SJ, Konrad G, Uhl M, Sudkamp N: Results after microfracture of full-thickness chondral defects in different compartments in the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006, 14: 1119-1125. 10.1016/j.joca.2006.05.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harwin SF: The medial parapatellar approach to the knee. J Knee Surg. 2003, 16: 43-47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beveridge JE, Shrive NG, Frank CB: Meniscectomy causes significant in vivo kinematic changes and mechanically induced focal chondral lesions in a sheep model. J Orthop Res. 2011, 29: 1397-1405. 10.1002/jor.21395.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heiligenstein S, Cucchiarini M, Laschke MW, Bohle RM, Kohn D, Menger M, Madry H: In vitro and in vivo characterization of non-biomedical and biomedical grade alginates for articular chondrocyte transplantation. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2011, 17: 829-842. 10.1089/ten.tec.2010.0681.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heiligenstein S, Cucchiarini M, Laschke MW, Bohle RM, Kohn D, Menger MD, Madry H: Evaluation of nonbiomedical and biomedical grade alginates for the transplantation of genetically modified articular chondrocytes to cartilage defects in a large animal model in vivo. J Gene Med. 2011, 13: 230-242.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Allen MJ, Houlton JE, Adams SB, Rushton N: The surgical anatomy of the stifle joint in sheep. Vet Surg. 1998, 27: 596-605. 10.1111/j.1532-950X.1998.tb00536.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Little CB, Smith MM, Cake MA, Read RA, Murphy MJ, Barry FP: The OARSI histopathology initiative - recommendations for histological assessments of osteoarthritis in sheep and goats. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010, 18 (Suppl 3): S80-S92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frisbie DD, Cross MW, McIlwraith CW: A comparative study of articular cartilage thickness in the stifle of animal species used in human pre-clinical studies compared to articular cartilage thickness in the human knee. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2006, 19: 142-146.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lu Y, Hayashi K, Hecht P, Fanton GS, Thabit G, Cooley AJ, Edwards RB, Markel MD: The effect of monopolar radiofrequency energy on partial-thickness defects of articular cartilage. Arthroscopy. 2000, 16: 527-536. 10.1053/jars.2000.7690.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Orth P, Goebel L, Wolfram U, Ong MF, Graber S, Kohn D, Cucchiarini M, Ignatius A, Pape D, Madry H: Effect of subchondral drilling on the microarchitecture of subchondral bone: analysis in a large animal model at 6 months. Am J Sports Med. 2012, 40: 828-836. 10.1177/0363546511430376.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dorotka R, Windberger U, Macfelda K, Bindreiter U, Toma C, Nehrer S: Repair of articular cartilage defects treated by microfracture and a three-dimensional collagen matrix. Biomaterials. 2005, 26: 3617-3629. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dorotka R, Bindreiter U, Macfelda K, Windberger U, Nehrer S: Marrow stimulation and chondrocyte transplantation using a collagen matrix for cartilage repair. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005, 13: 655-664. 10.1016/j.joca.2005.04.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burks RT, Greis PE, Arnoczky SP, Scher C: The use of a single osteochondral autograft plug in the treatment of a large osteochondral lesion in the femoral condyle: an experimental study in sheep. Am J Sports Med. 2006, 34: 247-255. 10.1177/0363546505279914.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Munirah S, Samsudin OC, Chen HC, Salmah SH, Aminuddin BS, Ruszymah BH: Articular cartilage restoration in load-bearing osteochondral defects by implantation of autologous chondrocyte-fibrin constructs: an experimental study in sheep. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007, 89: 1099-1109. 10.1302/0301-620X.89B8.18451.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bellemans J: Osseointegration in porous coated knee arthroplasty. The influence of component coating type in sheep. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1999, 288: 1-35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Young AA, McLennan S, Smith MM, Smith SM, Cake MA, Read RA, Melrose J, Sonnabend DH, Flannery CR, Little CB: Proteoglycan 4 downregulation in a sheep meniscectomy model of early osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006, 8: R41-10.1186/ar1898.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hepp P, Osterhoff G, Niederhagen M, Marquass B, Aigner T, Bader A, Josten C, Schulz R: Perilesional changes of focal osteochondral defects in an ovine model and their relevance to human osteochondral injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009, 91: 1110-1119. 10.1302/0301-620X.91B8.22057.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lu Y, Markel MD, Nemke B, Wynn S, Graf B: Comparison of single- versus double-tunnel tendon-to-bone healing in an ovine model: a biomechanical and histological analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2009, 37: 512-517. 10.1177/0363546508327543.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fabbriciani C, Mulas PD, Ziranu F, Deriu L, Zarelli D, Milano G: Mechanical analysis of fixation methods for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon graft. An experimental study in sheep knees. Knee. 2005, 12: 135-138. 10.1016/j.knee.2004.05.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kohn D, Wirth CJ, Reiss G, Plitz W, Maschek H, Erhardt W, Wulker N: Medial meniscus replacement by a tendon autograft. Experiments in sheep. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992, 74: 910-917.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Benazzo F, Cadossi M, Cavani F, Fini M, Giavaresi G, Setti S, Cadossi R, Giardino R: Cartilage repair with osteochondral autografts in sheep: effect of biophysical stimulation with pulsed electromagnetic fields. J Orthop Res. 2008, 26: 631-642. 10.1002/jor.20530.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guo X, Wang C, Zhang Y, Xia R, Hu M, Duan C, Zhao Q, Dong L, Lu J, Qing Song Y: Repair of large articular cartilage defects with implants of autologous mesenchymal stem cells seeded into beta-tricalcium phosphate in a sheep model. Tissue Eng. 2004, 10: 1818-1829. 10.1089/ten.2004.10.1818.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hoemann CD, Hurtig M, Rossomacha E, Sun J, Chevrier A, Shive MS, Buschmann MD: Chitosan-glycerol phosphate/blood implants improve hyaline cartilage repair in ovine microfracture defects. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005, 87: 2671-2686. 10.2106/JBJS.D.02536.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hurtig MB, Novak K, McPherson R, McFadden S, McGann LE, Mul Drew K, Schachar NS: Osteochondral dowel transplantation for repair of focal defects in the knee: an outcome study using an ovine model. Vet Surg. 1998, 27: 5-16. 10.1111/j.1532-950X.1998.tb00092.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- von Rechenberg B, Akens MK, Nadler D, Bittmann P, Zlinszky K, Kutter A, Poole AR, Auer JA: Changes in subchondral bone in cartilage resurfacing–an experimental study in sheep using different types of osteochondral grafts. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2003, 11: 265-277. 10.1016/S1063-4584(03)00006-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frosch KH, Drengk A, Krause P, Viereck V, Miosge N, Werner C, Schild D, Sturmer EK, Sturmer KM: Stem cell-coated titanium implants for the partial joint resurfacing of the knee. Biomaterials. 2006, 27: 2542-2549. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tytherleigh-Strong G, Hurtig M, Miniaci A: Intra-articular hyaluronan following autogenous osteochondral grafting of the knee. Arthroscopy. 2005, 21: 999-1005. 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.05.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pearce SG, Hurtig MB, Clarnette R, Kalra M, Cowan B, Miniaci A: An investigation of 2 techniques for optimizing joint surface congruency using multiple cylindrical osteochondral autografts. Arthroscopy. 2001, 17: 50-55. 10.1053/jars.2001.19966.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Uhl M, Lahm A, Bley TA, Haberstroh J, Mrosek E, Ghanem N, Erggelet C: Experimental autologous osteochondral plug transfer in the treatment of focal chondral defects: magnetic resonance imaging signs of technical success in sheep. Acta Radiol. 2005, 46: 875-880. 10.1080/02841850500335127.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tibesku CO, Szuwart T, Kleffner TO, Schlegel PM, Jahn UR, Van Aken H, Fuchs S: Hyaline cartilage degenerates after autologous osteochondral transplantation. J Orthop Res. 2004, 22: 1210-1214. 10.1016/j.orthres.2004.03.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jones CW, Willers C, Keogh A, Smolinski D, Fick D, Yates PJ, Kirk TB, Zheng MH: Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation in sheep: objective assessments including confocal arthroscopy. J Orthop Res. 2008, 26: 292-303. 10.1002/jor.20502.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Armstrong SJ, Read RA, Price R: Topographical variation within the articular cartilage and subchondral bone of the normal ovine knee joint: a histological approach. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1995, 3: 25-33. 10.1016/S1063-4584(05)80035-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Little CB, Ghosh P: Variation in proteoglycan metabolism by articular chondrocytes in different joint regions is determined by post-natal mechanical loading. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1997, 5: 49-62. 10.1016/S1063-4584(97)80031-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Little CB, Ghosh P, Bellenger CR: Topographic variation in biglycan and decorin synthesis by articular cartilage in the early stages of osteoarthritis: an experimental study in sheep. J Orthop Res. 1996, 14: 433-444. 10.1002/jor.1100140314.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harrop JS, Styliaras JC, Ooi YC, Radcliff KE, Vaccaro AR, Wu C: Contributing factors to surgical site infections. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012, 20: 94-101. 10.5435/JAAOS-20-02-094.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anderson DR, Gershuni DH, Nakhostine M, Danzig LA: The effects of non-weight-bearing and limited motion on the tensile properties of the meniscus. Arthroscopy. 1993, 9: 440-445. 10.1016/S0749-8063(05)80319-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Russlies M, Behrens P, Ehlers EM, Brohl C, Vindigni C, Spector M, Kurz B: Periosteum stimulates subchondral bone densification in autologous chondrocyte transplantation in a sheep model. Cell Tissue Res. 2005, 319: 133-142. 10.1007/s00441-004-1001-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hahn JA, Witte TS, Arens D, Pearce A, Pearce S: Double-plating of ovine critical sized defects of the tibia: a low morbidity model enabling continuous in vivo monitoring of bone healing. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011, 12: 214-10.1186/1471-2474-12-214.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Shettko DL, Trostle SS: Diagnosis and surgical repair of patellar luxations in a flock of sheep. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2000, 216: 564-566. 10.2460/javma.2000.216.564.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baron RJ: Laterally luxating patella in a goat. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1987, 191: 1471-1472.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van Hoogmoed L, Snyder JR, Vasseur P: Surgical repair of patellar luxation in llamas: 7 cases (1980–1996). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1998, 212: 860-865.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Willauer CC, Vasseur PB: Clinical results of surgical correction of medial luxation of the patella in dogs. Vet Surg. 1987, 16: 31-36. 10.1111/j.1532-950X.1987.tb00910.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaneps AJ: Orthopedic conditions of small ruminants. Llama, sheep, goat, and deer. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 1996, 12: 211-231.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miyamoto K, Ishimaru J, Kurita K, Goss AN: Synovial matrix metalloproteinase-2 in different stages of sheep temporomandibular joint osteoarthrosis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002, 60: 66-72. 10.1053/joms.2002.29077.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Recabarren SE, Vergara M, Llanos AJ, Seron-Ferre M: Circadian variation of rectal temperature in newborn sheep. J Dev Physiol. 1987, 9: 399-408.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Igono MO, Molokwu EC, Aliu YO: Seasonal variations in rectal temperature of Yankasa sheep. Vet Res Commun. 1983, 6: 223-226. 10.1007/BF02214916.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- von Rechenberg B, Akens MK, Nadler D, Bittmann P, Zlinszky K, Neges K, Auer JA: The use of photooxidized, mushroom-structured osteochondral grafts for cartilage resurfacing–a comparison to photooxidized cylindrical grafts in an experimental study in sheep. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2004, 12: 201-216. 10.1016/j.joca.2003.11.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mrosek E, Erggelet C, McDonald JA, Kurz H: Hyaluronan synthases in normal and regenerating joint cartilage. Cells Tissues Organs. 2003, 173: 93-104. 10.1159/000068944.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nuss KM, Auer JA, Boos A, von Rechenberg B: An animal model in sheep for biocompatibility testing of biomaterials in cancellous bones. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006, 7: 67-10.1186/1471-2474-7-67.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Boothe HW: Suture Materials, Tissue Adhesives, Staplers, and Ligating Clips. Textbook of small animal surgery. Edited by: Slatter D. 2003, WB Saunders Co, Philadelphia, 235-244. 3Google Scholar
- Vasseur P: Stifle joint. Textbook of small animal surgery. Edited by: Slatter D. 2003, WB Saunders Co, Philadelphia, 1854-1861. 3Google Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/14/5/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.