Skip to main content

Table 1 Basic characteristics and lower extremity alignment measurement in children with and without flexible flatfoot

From: Lower extremity kinematics in children with and without flexible flatfoot: a comparative study

 

Flexible flatfoot group, N = 20

Mean (SD)

Control group, N = 10

Mean (SD)

Mean Difference

(95% CI)

Age (years)

9.7 (0.9)

9.6(1.2)

0.17 (-1.01 to 1.35)

Height(cm)

133.53 (7.61)

137.2 (8.26)

1.6 (-4.99 to 8.12)

Weight(kg)

30.23 (6.18)

31.8 (5.54)

4.0 (-4.14 to 12.09)

Body mass index (kg/m2)

16.8 (2.2)

16.82 (2.14)

1.1 (-2.34 to 2.35)

Non-weight bearing Calcaneal eversion/inversion (°)a

-0.75 (4.43)

-0.3 (4.57)

0.45 (-3.10 to 4.00)

Weight bearing calcaneal evrsion/inversion (°)b

10.03 (3.18)

5.95 (1.38)

-4.08 (-5.79 to -2.37)

Weight bearing navicular height (cm)

3.17 (0.91)

4.13 (0.27)

0.96 (0.35 to 1.56)

Q angle (°)

16.25 (2.37)

17.6 (7.78)

-1.35 (-6.55 to 3.85)

Ankle ROM with knee extension (°)

16.13 (12.34)

15.85 (9.11)

-0.28 (-9.32 to 8.77)

Ankle ROM with knee flexion (°)

35.48 (17.92)

29.95 (13.11)

-5.53 (-17.43 to 6.38)

Femoral anteversion (°)

10.15 (4.45)

9.9 (3.09)

-0.25 (-3.47 to 2.97)

  1. a: +:calcaneus eversion; -:calcaneus inversion
  2. b: +:calcaneus eversion; -:calcaneus inversion
  3. 95%CI: 95% Confidence interval of the difference
  4. Statistically significant associations are given in bold face