Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 12 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Toru Maruyama |
| 15 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tomasz Kotwicki |
| 8 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ming Li |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 8 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 8 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ming Li |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 8 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 8 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ming Li |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 8 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 8 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ming Li |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 8 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
| 19 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Toru Maruyama |
| 9 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tomasz Kotwicki |
| 27 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ming Li |
| Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
| 27 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
| Publishing | ||
| 21 Dec 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 21 Dec 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-12-286 |
You can find further information about peer review here.