- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Temporomandibular joint disc repositioning using bone anchors: an immediate post surgical evaluation by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
© Zhang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
- Received: 7 September 2009
- Accepted: 12 November 2010
- Published: 12 November 2010
Open joint procedures using bone anchors have shown clinical and radiograph good success, but post surgical disc position has not been documented with MRI imaging. We have designed a modified technique of using two bone anchors and 2 sutures to reposition the articular discs. This MRI study evaluates the post surgical success of this technique to reposition and stabilize the TMJ articular discs.
Consecutive 81 patients with unilateral TMJ internal derangement (ID) (81 TMJs) were treated between December 1, 2003, and December 1, 2006, at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ninth Peoples Hospital, Shanghai, Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. All patients were subjected to magnetic resonance imaging before and one to seven days post surgery to determine disc position using the modified bone anchor technique.
Postoperative MRIs (one to seven days) confirm that 77 of 81 joints were identified as excellent results and one joint was considered good for an overall effective rate of 96.3% (78 of 81 joints). Only 3.7% (3 of 81) of the joints were designated as poor results requiring a second open surgery.
This procedure has provided successful repositioning of the articular discs in unilateral TMJ ID at one to seven days post surgery.
- Disc Displacement
- Internal Derangement
- Articular Disc
- Bone Anchor
- Anterior Release
The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is the only diarthrodial joint of the human jaws. The joint is formed by the bony articulations of the mandibular condyle and the temporal bone (glenoid fossa and articular eminence). Interposed between the condyle and the fossa is a piece of dense, avascular fibrous connective tissue, the TMJ disc. This disc divides the joint into superior and inferior joint compartments, which normally do not communicate with each other. The disc and condyle are in a normal anatomic relationship if the posterior band of the disc is located above the condylar head when the mandibular condyle is centrically positioned in the fossa. Because the bilaminar tissue posterior to the disc is relatively weak, TMJ disorders are a relatively common condition with an estimated incidence rate of 28% ~ 88% . Their most common cause is anterior and/or medial displacement of the disc, also known as TMJ internal derangement (ID), which can cause various degrees of pain and dysfunction. Previously reported clinical results of surgical TMJ disc repositioning procedures have been variable, with failures related to a lack of long-term stability, indicating a need for improved methods of disc stabilization . Since 1990s, the international community has been using arthroscope in the treatment of TMJ disc displacement, which was also tried in our department with an improved clinical efficacy [3–6]. Unfortunately, the technical requirement was relatively high, so it was very difficult for the patients in the late stages of ID, especially those with severe disc deformation or thickening bilaminar tissue. In addition, the suture was connected with soft tissues in the anterior wall of the external auditory canal, which caused difficulties in replacing the disc or instability after its repositioning. To overcome this problem, the disc had to be fixed to hard tissues. Open joint procedures using bone anchors by Mehra and Wolford  have shown clinical and radiograph good success, but post surgical disc position has not been documented with MRI imaging. This study presented a surgical technique that used a bone anchor to stabilize the TMJ disc, and to assess the disc position using MRI evaluation.
Between Dec 2003 and Dec 2006, 81 consecutive patients (81 joints) diagnosed as ID were treated with the use of the anchor in TMJ articular disc-repositioning surgery. Some patients suffered from bilateral joints disease, but one side did not in accordance with the diagnostic criteria of Wilkes-Bronstein classification for TMJ disorders , so these sides were not included in this study. There were 23 men and 58 women, with a mean age of 38.5 years (range 23-74). The mean duration of ID before disc-repositioning was 12.06 months (range 0.5-60). Of all 81 patients (81 joints), 3 patients (3 joints) with whom arthroscopic surgery could not be accomplished, were retreated by open disc-repositioning alternatively. Before operation, written informed consents were obtained from each participants enrolled in the study, and the study was also approved by the university ethics Committee.
The distributions of various ID stages through disc anchorage
TMJ disc anchors, which were self-inserting and non absorbable titanium screw (CBMA 2.0-7-105, CiXi Cibei Mouth Cavity Instrument Co., Ltd.) with a length of 5 mm, were originally developed for use in orthopedic surgery procedures. The head and screw threads transited smoothly, forming a groove which was easy for the anchor suture to tie a knot. A special device was used to insert the anchor in the condyle 2-0 Ethibond suture (ETHIBOND*EXCEL, GREEN BRAIDED Polyester suture, ETHICON, INC), which created advantages such as little rejection, better compatibility and non-absorption. Although its disadvantages included definite irritation and inelasticity, the Ethibond suture was thought to be of low rejection, high intensity and regarded as an ideal suture. It was 75 cm long, with two suturing needles at both ends, so that it could be cut into two equal anchor sutures.
Post-operative MRIs confirmed that 95.06% of the joints (77/81) were excellent, 1.23% of the joints (1/81) was good, 3.70% of the joints (3/81) were evaluated as poor, in which the disc was not replaced. Cases evaluated as "excellent" and "good", were calculated as successful cases, so the total effective rate was 96.30% (78/81). Only 3.70% of the joints (3/81) were poor. A second open surgery was performed for those 3 patients and satisfactory results were obtained finally. Among those 3 patients, 1 patient (1 joint) was replaced by a temporal myofascial flap and the other 2 patients (2 joints) had a TMJ replacement.
Although Annandale  first described surgical disc repositioning of the displaced TMJ disc in 1887, it was not until 1978, when Wilkes  used arthrography to describe the anatomy, form and function of the TMJ, that disc repositioning gradually became an accepted surgical technique. Before that time, the routinely recommended treatment for TMJ ID was either to do nothing or to remove the disc. In 1979, McCarty et al  repositioned the TMJ disc by a posterior wedge resection (2 mm) of the bilaminar zone, and the success rate was reported to be 94%. However, the similar success with this technique was not achieved by other surgeons. This led to many kinds of new or modified TMJ disc-repositioning surgery with various success rates . Some physicians have applied arthroscopic suturing technique to reposition the disc, however, thus far, there has been no successful report of stable effect . Mehra and Wolford  first inserted only one mitek anchor into the condylar process and fixed the disc with special suture in the treatment of 105 patients (188 joints), and achieved a good therapeutic effect. But the effects were only evaluated by clinical examination, without the imaging evaluation of the disc position. In our study, in order to have a stable repositioning of the disc whose diameter was more than 3 cm from medial to lateral, we implanted 2 TMJ anchors for 2-point stabilization of the disc, into the margo-inferior junction in the posterior slope of the condylar process (Figure 2), just in the middle of lateral-middle junction and medial-middle junction, which differed in the study of Mehra and Wolford . Postoperative MRIs confirmed that 96.30% of patients (78/81) were accurately repositioned. Sembronio  introduced a similar disc repositioning technique except the absorbable anchor screw. Meanwhile, their postoperative clinical and imaging evaluations were not reported, either.
In the study of Mehra and Wolford , patients with a history of less and more than 4 years were compared, and the statistic analysis showed that there was significant difference in the success rate between the two groups. The success rate of the former group was more than 90%, while the later one was only 68%. Mehra and Wolford insisted on early treatment for ID based on the data stated above, which was consistent with our view. Although the patients included were diagnosed as III ~ V stages according to the Wilkes-Bronstein criteria, arthroscopic disc repositioning was first used for the disc without severe deformation. After all, arthroscopic surgery has incomparable advantages superior to open surgery for its minimal invasiveness, which has been widely used in our department with an efficiency rate of about 97% . However, this arthroscopic disc repositioning was not suitable for some patients diagnosed as IV or V stages of ID. In our study, 45.68% of the patients were over IV stage, thus strictly following the indications was very important. Except clinical symptoms, high resolution MRI is of great value for choosing proper patients. Based on the literature  and our own experience with MRI evaluation for the disc position, length and shape, as well as the early change of the condylar process and glenoid fossa, we summarized the following MRI indications. ①Although conspicuous disc displacement, degeneration and thickening of the biliminar zone existed, the disc also retains double-concave shape which could not be repositioned easily under arthroscopy. ②No disc intermission with fibrous tissue on sagittal T1-weighted MRI.③The anteroposterior diameter of the disc was longer than half of the condyle process on sagittal T1-weighted MRI. ④the disc diameter from medial to lateral was larger than that of half of the condyle process on coronal T1-weighted MRI. Disc repositioning was carried out in cases of disc perforation in the biliminar zone for the patients in V stage, otherwise, it was excluded.
Delicate surgical procedure is essential for an effective treatment and the following points should be noted: ①Minimize the damage to the facet cartilage and the synovial membrane. ②Anterior release should be dissected completely and the obstacles for disc movement should be removed thoroughly. ③TMJ anchor should be inserted in the inferior border of the condylar posterior bevel rather than in the joint surface to avoid damage to the surface. ④When inserting the anchor screw, the action should be light and soft to prevent splitting the cortical bone and loosening the anchor. ⑤When fixing a tie, the condyle should be on the posterior and the superior of fossa. ⑥The reset direction in the sagittal and the coronal plane should be strictly inspected to make sure that its suture traction direction was exactly the same with the anteroposterior axis of the disc. ⑦Horizontal mattress sutures should be applied from medial to lateral with 2 or 3 sutures, so that the disc is anatomically repositioned and stabilized. ⑧At the end of the surgery, the trailing edge of the disc will take as much as possible on the 11 o'clock (right joints) or 1 o'clock (the left side of the joint) position, which can offset the possible relaxation after a suture knot. ⑨Mouth opening exercises should be taken earlier to promote the recovering of the joint function.
This technique provides a method to reposition the articular discs confirmed by MRI immediately post surgery. MRIs confirmed that over 96.3% of the patients (78 of 81) had successful disc repositioning at the immediate post surgical time interval, however, long-term follow-up studies are required to validate the success of this treatment approach.
This study was supported by Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai (08DZ2271100), Grant of Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project (S30206), Grant from Shanghai Municipal Bureau of Health (2008160), Project of Shanghai "Phosphor" Science Foundation (04QMH1415), Grant from the Ph.D. Programs Foundation of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (BXJ0926), and Research Fund of Medicine and Engineering of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (YG2009MS42), a grant from the Ph.D. Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (No. 20090073110068), a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (Grant No. 10ZR1418200).
- Qiu WL, Zhang ZK: The textbook of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (in Chinese). 2004, Peking, People's Medical Publishing House (PMPH), 304-5Google Scholar
- Kerstens HC, Tuinzing DB, van der Kwast WA: Eminectomy and discoplasty for correction of the displaced temporomandibular joint disc. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1989, 47: 150-154. 10.1016/S0278-2391(89)80106-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Israel HA: Technique for placement of a discal traction suture during temporomandibular joint arthroscopy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1989, 47: 311-313. 10.1016/0278-2391(89)90240-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tarro AW: Arthroscopic treatment of anterior disc displacement: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1989, 47: 353-358. 10.1016/0278-2391(89)90336-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ohnishi M: Arthroscopic surgery for hypermobility and recurrentmandibular dislocation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 1989, 1: 153-156.Google Scholar
- McCain JP, Podrasky AE, Zabiegalski NAJ: Arthroscopic disc repositioning and suturing: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992, 50: 568-579. 10.1016/0278-2391(92)90435-3. discussion 579-580View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mehra P, Wolford LM: Use of the Mitek anchor in temporomandibular joint disc-repositioning surgery. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2001, 14: 22-26.Google Scholar
- Wilkes CH: Internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint: Pathological variations. Arch Otolargynol head Neck Surg. 1989, 115: 469-477.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen MJ, Yang C, Zhang SY, Cai XY, Yun B: Using coblation via the temperomandibular joint arthroscopy to treat internal derangement. China J Oral Maxillofac Surg (in Chinese). 2005, 3: 189-192.Google Scholar
- Yang C, Zhang SY, Wang XD, Fan XD: Magnetic resonance arthrography applied to the diagnosis of intra-articular adhesions of the temporomandibular joint. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005, 34: 733-738. 10.1016/j.ijom.2005.02.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang SY, Yang C, Chen MJ, Fan XD, Yun B, Peng Y, Yuan D: Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of intra-articular adhesions of the temporomandibular joint. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009, 47: 389-392. 10.1016/j.bjoms.2008.09.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Holmlund AB, Surgery for TMJ internal derangement: Evaluation of treatment outcome and criteria for success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993, 22: 75-77. 10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80806-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang SY, Yang C, Cai XY, Chen MJ, Yun B, Peng Y: MRI evaluation on arthroscopic temporomandibular joint disc repositioning and suturing. J Oral Maxillofac Surg (in Chinese). 2008, 18: 31-34.Google Scholar
- Annandale T: On displacement of the interarticular cartilage of the lower jaw and its treatment by operation. Lancet. 1887, 1: 411-412. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)28282-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wilkes CH: Arthrography of the temporomandibular joint in patients with the TMJ pain-dysfunction syndrome. Minn Med. 1978, 61: 645-652.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- McCarty WL, Farrar WB: Surgery for internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint. J Prosthet Dent. 1979, 42: 191-196. 10.1016/0022-3913(79)90174-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dolwick MF, Nitzan DW: The role of disc-repositioning surgery for internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint. Oral Maxillofac Surg North Am. 1994, 6: 271-275.Google Scholar
- Mehra P, Wolford LM: The Mitek mini anchor for TMJ disc repositioning: surgical technique and results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001, 30: 497-503. 10.1054/ijom.2001.0163.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sembronio S, Robiony M, Politi M: Disc-repositioning surgery of the temporomandibular joint using bioresorbable screws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006, 35: 1149-1152. 10.1016/j.ijom.2006.06.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/11/262/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.