This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma: patient survival after surgical treatment
© Fottner et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 3 May 2010
Accepted: 3 July 2010
Published: 3 July 2010
Surgery is the primary treatment of skeletal metastases from renal cell carcinoma, because radiation and chemotherapy frequently are not effecting the survival. We therefore explored factors potentially affecting the survival of patients after surgical treatment.
We retrospectively reviewed 101 patients operatively treated for skeletal metastases of renal cell carcinoma between 1980 and 2005. Overall survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The effects of different variables were evaluated using a log-rank test.
27 patients had a solitary bone metastasis, 20 patients multiple bone metastases and 54 patients had concomitant visceral metastases. The overall survival was 58% at 1 year, 37% at 2 years and 12% at 5 years. Patients with solitary bone metastases had a better survival (p < 0.001) compared to patients with multiple metastases. Age younger than 65 years (p = 0.036), absence of pathologic fractures (p < 0.001) and tumor-free resection margins (p = 0.028) predicted higher survival. Gender, location of metastases, time between diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma and treatment of metastatic disease, incidence of local recurrence, radiation and chemotherapy did not influence survival.
The data suggest that patients with a solitary metastasis or a limited number of resectable metastases are candidates for wide resections. As radiation and chemotherapy are ineffective in most patients, surgery is a better option to achieve local tumor control and increase the survival.
Renal cell cancer (RCC) is among the 10 most common cancers in both men and women. It comprises 2-3% of all malignancies . The incidence of RCC in the United States has been increasing at a rate of approximately 3% per year . Approximately one third of patients with newly diagnosed RCC have metastatic disease at the initial presentation . The most common site for metastasis from RCC is the lung (50% of patients), followed by the skeleton (20% to 50% of patients) [4, 5].
Approximately 50% of patients presenting with metastases die within the first year and only 10% survive more than 5 years . Compared to other types of carcinoma frequently affecting bone the prognosis of RCC is better than for lung cancer, but not as good as for breast or prostate cancer . The main reason for the poor prognosis is the poor response of RCC metastases to radiation and chemotherapeutic regimens .
Patients with solitary bone metastasis from RCC reportedly have the best prognosis, with a 5 year-survival rate between 35% and 60% . Owing to the longer survival of patients with solitary bone metastasis, a number of authors recommend a surgical approach with curative intent and implant stabilization to prevent local disease progression [7–11].
The aim of this study was to identify clinical, pathological and surgical factors that are associated with better survival of patients after surgical treatment of skeletal metastases from RCC.
We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of 101 patients surgically treated for osseous metastases from RCC between 1980 and 2005. Clinical data for these patients were obtained through hospital records and the patient database system. The minimum clinical follow up was 24 months or until death (range 1-244 months). Due to the clear retrospective nature of the study an approval by the ethic committee was not necessary at our university. Perioperative variables collected were age and gender of the patient, type of surgery, complications, time period after first diagnosis of RCC and after onset of symptoms, metastatic pattern, location of metastases, incidence of pathologic fracture and local recurrence and time of survival.
Preoperative investigations included conventional radiographs, CT scan or MRI to evaluate the size and site of the tumor. If the diagnosis of metastasis was in question, a preoperative needle biopsy was obtained to confirm the histological diagnosis. CT scans of the chest, abdomen and pelvis were performed to evaluate visceral metastases. In all cases the diagnosis of metastatic RCC was confirmed by the intraoperative obtained histological examination.
The surgical treatment for bone metastases varied in each patient. Factors influencing the choice of surgery included age, disease status, symptoms, morbidity of the patient, the location and extend of bone disease, existence of extraosseous metastases and the patient's wishes. Until the year 1997 we pursued a comparatively palliative treatment concept with limited surgery. After that time as a result of reports in the literature, we changed to a surgical approach with more curative intent, especially for patients with localized metastatic disease [9, 11–14]. This included an interdisciplinary surgical regimen for patients with a limited amount of additional visceral metastases. This subpopulation was also analysed.
Survival was analyzed with respect to location and dissemination of metastases, age, interval after diagnosis of RCC, existence of pathologic fractures, local recurrences, margin of the resection and the use of chemotherapy and radiation. Results of the palliative surgical treatment used until 1997 were compared with those surgical approach with more curative intent used after 1997.
Statistical analyses were performed using MedCalc v 10.3.1 (MedCalc Software, Mariakerke, Belgium). Incidences of local recurrence in respect to different treatment regimes were analysed using the McNemar test. The survival distribution for overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method . Correlations of survival were calculated using the log-rank test with p < 0.05 defined as significant.
Age at time of surgery
Time between diagnosis of RCC and osseous metastasis
Symptoms at time of presentation
Duration of symptoms before presentation
Types of Surgery
Without internal fixation
Without internal fixation
Wound healing disorder
Infection of endoprosthesis
Dislocation of endoprosthesis
17 patients (16.8%) developed a local recurrence. 11 of these 17 cases (64.7%) were treated by reresection of the tumor. Two patients with local recurrence received radiation therapy for pain reduction, and 4 patients were not treated owing to tumor progression. Radiation did significantly (p = 0.377) not affect the incidence of local recurrence. A local recurrence occurred in 10.5% (2/19) of patients who received radiation treatment preoperatively, in 18.6% (11/59) of patients who received radiation treatment postoperatively, and in 17.4% (4/23) of patients who did not receive radiation treatment. Local recurrence was significantly (p < 0.001) less frequent in patients with negative resection margins 4.7% (1/21), when compared to those with tumor-infiltrated margins 20% (16/80).
Analysis of overall survival
Overall survival at 1 year
Overall survival at 5 years
Bone and visceral
< 65 years
> 65 years
Time of operation
Time after diagnosis of RCC
< 2 years
> 2 years
We were trying to identify factors that are associated with better survival of patients after surgical treatment of skeletal metastases from RCC. Patients with osseous metastases of RCC have an unfavorable prognosis. In some studies, more than 50% of patients die within the first year [7, 9, 10, 17, 18]. The survival rate for our patients was with 58.4% at 1 year and 11.9% at 5 years slightly better. However, in some studies patients had a better survival rate [8, 12, 19], but Althausen et al. 1997  and Tobisu et al. 1989  studied small patient sample, and Fuchs et al. 2005  investigated only patients with solitary bone metastases.
Comparable to other studies, the Kaplan-Meier survival rate curves (Figure 1, 2, 3 and 4) contain two main features: survival decreases steeply in the first year, and the curve diminishes after a period of proximally 24 months.
The first, and most important, decision of a surgeon dealing with patients who have metastases from RCC is to select the appropriate treatment concept with respect to the extent of the metastatic disease and prognosis of the patient. For patients with the potential of becoming a long-term survivor, an aggressive surgical resection should be considered [7, 10, 11].
The metastatic pattern with solitary bone metastases has been identified as having the strongest association with survival [7–11, 20, 21]. We came to the same conclusion; patients with solitary bone metastases had a better survival rate than patients with multiple bone metastases or visceral involvement.
We found patients younger than 65 years and patients without a pathologic fracture at the time of surgery have a better prognosis. Two other studies [8, 17] came to the same conclusions concerning younger patients. But most studies examining patients with metastases from RCC have reported no correlation concerning the age with survival [7, 9, 10, 12, 20, 21]. The influence of pathologic fractures on survival was analyzed in a few studies. Although some studies [20, 22–24] verified that patients with a pathologic fracture had an unfavorable survival, one study could not support the importance of pathologic fractures .
Factors that did not influence survival in our study were gender, local recurrence, radiation, chemotherapy and location of metastases. Although only one study associated male gender with prolonged survival , gender was not important in other studies [4, 7, 9, 10, 12, 17, 20]. The influence of local recurrence on survival was analyzed in only one study . This study confirms our suggests that a local recurrence of the tumor does not decrease the prognosis.
A controversial factor is the influence of the location of metastases on the prognosis. Although two studies [7, 12] show there is a difference in the survival rate between metastases of the axial compared with the appendicular skeleton, our findings, and two other studies [4, 7] could not detect an influence of the location.
For patients with multiple metastases and a limited survival time, surgery remains the preferred therapy because RCC often is resistant to chemotherapy and radiation therapy [8, 10, 12, 24–27]. Even though radiation of osseous metastases can be useful for pain control and prevention of fractures , surgery is more effective in restoring function and preventing local tumor progression [11, 24]. The analysis of the 17 cases of local recurrence in our patients did not show a preventive effect of radiation for local tumor progression. On the contrary, the incidence of local recurrence was less frequent for surgical procedures with tumor-free margin.
As bone metastasis stands for an advanced stage of disease, it was considered a secondary goal to achieve cure of disease by radical resection of the tumor. However, favorable survival rates after successful radical resection of bony metastases justify a surgical approach with more curative intent [7–10, 20, 29, 30]. The therapeutic concept at our institution was changed in 1997 to a more curative approach. We believe this was the right decision, as we observed a substantial improvement in survival with the new therapeutic concept for patients with solitary metastasis.
Regarding the operative procedures, our data confirm other studies that a resection with a tumor-free margin increases the survival rate [7, 8, 12, 24]. We believe one should aim for the widest resection of metastases as technically possible. Even patients with a combination of resecable osseous and visceral metastases are candidates for an interdisciplinary curative surgical regimen because the status of "free of disease" gave the patients in our study the best chance to become long-term survivors (> 40% survival rate after 5 years).
Similar to other studies we found that patients with solitary metastases without pathologic fracture have the best prognosis for long-term survival. More controversial predictors are age, gender, local recurrence, the interval after diagnosis of RCC and the location of the metastases. For patients with mid-term to long-term prognosis, surgeons should try to achieve tumor-free margins to enhance the survival rate and achieve local tumor control. This also applies to patients with a limited amount of resectable osseous and visceral metastases. As radiation and chemotherapy have little effect on survival, even patients with an unfavorable prognosis should be considered for surgery.
No benefits or funds were received in support for the study.
- McLaughlin JK, Lipworth L: Epidemiologic aspects of renal cell cancer. Semin Oncol. 2000, 27: 115-123.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chow WH, Devesa SS, Warren JL, Fraumeni JF: Rising incidence of renal cell cancer in the United States. JAMA. 1999, 5;281 (17): 1628-31. 10.1001/jama.281.17.1628.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Patard JJ, Kim HL, Lam JS, Dorey FJ, Pantuck AJ, Zisman A, Ficarra V, Han KR, Cindolo L, De La Taille A, Tostain J, Artibani W, Dinney CP, Wood CG, Swanson DA, Abbou CC, Lobel B, Mulders PF, Chopin DK, Figlin RA, Belldegrun AS: Use of the University of California Los Angeles integrated staging system to predict survival in renal cell carcinoma: an international multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2004, 15;22 (16): 3316-22. 10.1200/JCO.2004.09.104.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Han KR, Pantuck AJ, Bui MH, Shvarts O, Freitas DG, Zisman A, Leibovich BC, Dorey FJ, Gitlitz BJ, Figlin RA, Belldegrun AS: Number of metastatic sites rather than location dictates overall survival of patients with node-negative metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Urology. 2003, 61 (2): 314-9. 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02163-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zekri J, Ahmed N, Coleman RE, Hancock BW: The skeletal metastatic compli cations of renal cell carcinoma. Int J Oncol. 2001, 19 (2): 379-82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Motzer RJ, Bacik J, Mazumdar M: Prognostic factors for survival of patients with stage IV renal cell carcinoma: memorial sloan-kettering cancer center experience. Clin Cancer Res. 2004, 15;10 (18 Pt 2): 6302S-3S. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-040031.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jung ST, Ghert MA, Harrelson JM, Scully SP: Treatment of osseous metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003, 409: 223-31. 10.1097/01.blo.0000059580.08469.3e.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fuchs B, Trousdale RT, Rock MG: Solitary bony metastasis from renal cell carcinoma: significance of surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005, 431: 187-92. 10.1097/01.blo.0000149820.65137.b4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dürr HR, Maier M, Pfahler M, Baur A, Refior HJ: Surgical treatment of osseous metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999, 367: 283-90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lin PP, Mirza AN, Lewis VO, Cannon CP, Tu SM, Tannir NM, Yasko AW: Patient survival after surgery for osseous metastases from renal cell carcinoma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007, 89 (8): 1794-801. 10.2106/JBJS.F.00603.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Russo P: Renal cell carcinoma: presentation, staging, and surgical treatment. Semin Oncol. 2000, 27 (2): 160-76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Althausen P, Althausen A, Jennings LC, Mankin HJ: Prognostic factors and surgical treatment of osseous metastases secondary to renal cell carcinoma. Cancer. 1997, 15;80 (6): 1103-9. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970915)80:6<1103::AID-CNCR13>3.0.CO;2-C.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Smith EM, Kursh ED, Makley J, Resnick MI: Treatment of osseous metastases secondary to renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 1992, 148 (3): 784-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stener B, Henriksson C, Johansson S, Gunterberg B, Pettersson S: Surgical removal of bone and muscle metastases of renal cancer. Acta Orthop Scand. 1984, 55 (5): 491-500. 10.3109/17453678408992944.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaplan EL, Meier P: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958, 53: 457-81. 10.2307/2281868.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Goodman MA: A system for the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980, 153: 106-20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beisland C, Medby PC, Beisland HO: Presumed radically treated renal cell carcinoma--recurrence of the disease and prognostic factors for subsequent survival. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2004, 38 (4): 299-305. 10.1080/00365590410028818.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ulmar B, Catalkaya S, Naumann U, Gerstner S, Cakir B, Schmidt R, Reichel H, Huch K: Surgical treatment and evaluation of prognostic factors in spinal metastases of renal cell carcinoma. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2006, 144 (1): 58-67. 10.1055/s-2006-921465.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tobisu K, Kakizoe T, Takai K, Tanaka Y: Prognosis in renal cell carcinoma: analysis of clinical course following nephrectomy. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1989, 19 (2): 142-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Böhm P, Huber J: The surgical treatment of bony metastases of the spine and limbs. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002, 84 (4): 521-9. 10.1302/0301-620X.84B4.12495.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Toyoda Y, Shinohara N, Harabayashi T, Abe T, Akino T, Sazawa A, Nonomura K: Survival and prognostic classification of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma of bone. Eur Urol. 2007, 52 (1): 163-8. 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.060.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grant TT, deKernion JB: Treatment of skeletal metastases from urologic malignancies. Urology. 1978, 11 (6): 563-7. 10.1016/0090-4295(78)90003-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johnson DE, Kaesler KE, Samuels ML: Is nephrectomy justified in patients with metastatic renal carcinoma?. J Urol. 1975, 114 (1): 27-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kollender Y, Bickels J, Price WM, Kellar KL, Chen J, Merimsky O, Meller I, Malawer MM: Metastatic renal cell carcinoma of bone: indications and technique of surgical intervention. J Urol. 2000, 164 (5): 1505-8. 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67016-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baloch KG, Grimer RJ, Carter SR, Tillman RM: Radical surgery for the solitary bony metastasis from renal-cell carcinoma. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000, 82 (1): 62-7. 10.1302/0301-620X.82B1.9995.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dineen MK, Pastore RD, Emrich LJ, Huben RP: Results of surgical treatment of renal cell carcinoma with solitary metastasis. J Urol. 1988, 140 (2): 277-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee J, Hodgson D, Chow E, Bezjak A, Catton P, Tsuji D, O'Brien M, Danjoux C, Hayter C, Warde P, Gospodarowicz MK: A phase II trial of palliative radiotherapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2005, 1;104 (9): 1894-900. 10.1002/cncr.21410.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reichel LM, Pohar S, Heiner J, Buzaianu EM, Damron TA: Radiotherapy to bone has utility in multifocal metastatic renal carcinoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007, 459: 133-8. 10.1097/BLO.0b013e3180616594.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Swanson DA, Orovan WL, Johnson DE, Giacco G: Osseous metastases secondary to renal cell carcinoma. Urology. 1981, 18 (6): 556-61. 10.1016/0090-4295(81)90455-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tongaonkar HB, Kulkarni JN, Kamat MR: Solitary metastases from renal cell carcinoma: a review. J Surg Oncol. 1992, 49 (1): 45-8. 10.1002/jso.2930490111.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/11/145/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.