Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of studies included in meta-analysis

From: Comparison of the coverage and rotation of asymmetrical and symmetrical tibial components: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Country

Design

Prosthesis types

Operation type

Patients/Knees

Male/Female

Age(years)

Outcomes

Mean Follow-up(months)

Asymmetrical

Symmetric

Koster LA et al., 2021 [10]

Netherlands

RCT

Persona

NexGen

Actual TKA

31/31

38/38

13/19

16/22

63.8 ± 12.0

67.3 ± 8.0

Revision rate

24

Minoda Y et al., 2017 [11]

Japan

RCT

Advance medial pivot

Evolution medial pivot

Actual TKA

31/31a

2/29a

69 ± 13a

Overhang

None

Indelli PF et al., 2015 [12]

USA

RCT

Persona

NexGen

Actual TKA

40/40

40/40

16/24

15/25

71(66–80)b

72(60–81)b

Rotation of the tibial component; Revision rate;

Clinical outcomes (Anterior knee pain, Oxford, ROM, Overall satisfaction rate, Survivorship)

24

Cho BW et al., 2020 [13]

Korea

Retrospective cohort

Persona

NexGen

Actual TKA

59/78

58/74

9/50

4/54

71.2 ± 5.7

71.1 ± 6.2

Underhang; Overhang; Revision rate; Clinical outcomes (VAS, KSS, WOMAC)

31.9 ± 5.8

33.9 ± 11.5

Rhee SJ et al., 2018 [14]

Korea

RCT

Persona

NexGen

Actual TKA

NR/50

NR/51

4/46

7/44

67.3 ± 7.3

68.7 ± 7.2

Rotation of the tibial component

0.5

Jin C et al., 2016 [15]

Korea

Retrospective cohort

Persona

NexGen

Actual TKA

100/100a

9/91a

71(56–83)a,b

Coverage rate; Underhang; Overhang;

None

Shaet s al, 2015 [16]

India

RCT

Genesis II

NexGen

Virtual TKA

150/300a

63/87a

35.5(18–50)a,b

Coverage rate; Underhang; Overhang;

None

Meier M et al., 2018 [17]

USA

Retrospective cohort

Persona

Sigma

Virtual TKA

100/100a

50/50a

65.6(49–93) a,b

Coverage rate

None

Stulberg SD et al., 2015 [18]

USA

Retrospective cohort

Persona

NexGen

Virtual TKA

91/100a

29/62a

66.4(41–84) a,b

Coverage rate; Rotation of the tibial component; Malrotation

None

Ma Y et al., 2017 [19]

Japan

Retrospective cohort

Persona

NexGen

Virtual TKA

77/77a

15/62a

NR

Overhang; Rotation of the tibial component

None

Martin S et al., 2014 [20]

USA

Retrospective cohort

NR

NR

Virtual TKA

30/30a

NR

NR

Coverage rate; Rotation of the tibial component; Malrotation

None

Wernecke GC et al., 2012 [21]

Australia

Retrospective cohort

Genesis II

NexGen

Virtual TKA

101/101a

74/27a

32(17–60) a,b

Coverage rate; Underhang; Overhang;

None

Clary C et al., 2014 [22]

USA

Retrospective cohort

Genesis II

Sigma

Virtual TKA

14,791/14791a

NR

NR

Coverage rate

None

Miyatake N et al., 2016 [23]

Japan

Retrospective cohort

Genesis II

NexGen

Actual TKA

NR/92

NR/586

9/83

111/475

73.7 ± 6.7a

Underhang

None

Maciag BM et al., 2021 [24]

Poland

Retrospective cohort

Persona

NexGen

Actual TKA

39/39

34/34

13/26

12/22

68.6 ± 6.3

69.5 ± 5.7

Underhang; Overhang;

1.5

Bizzozero P et al., 2018 [25]

France

Retrospective cohort

Persona

NexGen

Actual TKA

33/33

33/33

15/17

15/17

77(57–92)b

75(66–89)b

Coverage rate; Overhang; Rotation of the tibial component; Malrotation; Clinical outcomes (KSS)

44 ± 5.4

46 ± 5.7

  1. RCT Randomized controlled trial, NR No record, KSS Knee scociety score, ROM Range of motion, VAS Visual analogue scale, WOMAC Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, TKA Total knee arthroplasty
  2. aValues are presented as the same patients in the crossover design
  3. bValues are presented as mean(range)