Skip to main content

Table 4 Flap outcomes and complications

From: Clinical outcomes of perforator-based propeller flaps versus free flaps in soft tissue reconstruction for lower leg and foot trauma: a retrospective single-centre comparative study

  

PPF

FF

p value

Numbers of patients

 

15

18

 

Numbers of flaps

 

18

20

 

Follow-up period (months): mean ± SD (range)

 

31 ± 24 (4–86)

24 ± 21 (3–64)

0.37

Coverage failure (rate)

 

4 (22%)

1 (5%)

0.17

Postoperative complicationsa

No complications

3

9

0.35

 

Grade I

2

1

 
 

Grade II

1

0

 
 

Grade IIIa

4

3

 
 

Grade IIIb

8

7

 

Flap-related early complications (< 3 weeks)

 

14

8

0.03

 

Complete necrosis (rate)

2 (11%)

1 (5%)

0.59

 

Partial necrosis (rate)

7 (39%)

2 (10%)

0.06

 

Arterial thrombosis

0

1

1.00

 

Venous congestion (rate)

13 (72%)

2 (10%)

 <  0.001

 

Postoperative infection

2

7

0.13

Flap-related delayed complications (> 3 weeks)

 

5

1

0.08

 

Delayed osteomyelitis

4

0

0.04

 

Non-union

3

1b

0.22

Additional treatment until wound healing

 

14

12

0.31

 

Secondary closure

5

4

0.71

 

Debridement

3

5

0.70

 

Implant removal or change

2

1

1.00

 

Skin graft

1

3

0.61

 

Leech therapy

2

0

0.22

 

Secondary flap

4 (free ALT)

1 (free LD)

0.17

Additional surgery after wound healing

 

9

8

0.74

 

Implant removal

5

2

0.39

 

VBG for bone reconstruction

4

1

0.33

 

Bone graft

0

3

0.10

 

Arthrodesis

0

2

0.49

 

Defatting

0c

1

1.00

 

Tendon reconstruction

1

1

1.00

Patient mobility

 

0.4 ± 0.5

0.3 ± 0.6d

0.47

  1. PPF Perforator propeller flap, FF Free flap, SD Standard deviation, ALT Anterolateral thigh flap, LD Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap, VBG Vascularized bone graft
  2. aAccording to the Clavien–Dindo classification21
  3. bIncludes 1 pathological fracture
  4. cExcludes cases involving defatting for secondary free flap
  5. dExcludes 1 pathological fracture and 1 higher-order dysfunction