Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: An observational study of quality of motion in the aging cervical spine: sequence of segmental contributions in dynamic fluoroscopy recordings

Original Submission
29 Nov 2023 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Dec 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
26 Dec 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
24 Jan 2024 Author responded Author comments - Valérie N.E. Schuermans
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Jan 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Jan 2024 Author responded Author comments - Valérie N.E. Schuermans
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Jan 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Feb 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
3 Mar 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
15 Mar 2024 Author responded Author comments - Valérie N.E. Schuermans
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Mar 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 4
15 Mar 2024 Author responded Author comments - Valérie N.E. Schuermans
Resubmission - Version 5
15 Mar 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 5
19 Mar 2024 Author responded Author comments - Valérie N.E. Schuermans
Resubmission - Version 6
19 Mar 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 6
20 Mar 2024 Author responded Author comments - Valérie N.E. Schuermans
Resubmission - Version 7
20 Mar 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 7
24 Mar 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
5 Apr 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
8 Apr 2024 Editorially accepted
25 Apr 2024 Article published 10.1186/s12891-024-07423-z

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page