Skip to main content

Table 1 General comparison between the two groups

From: Comparison of the clinical outcomes between proximal femoral nail anti-rotation with cement enhancement and hemiarthroplasty among elderly osteoporotic patients with intertrochanteric fracture

Group

 

CE

HA

χ2/t/z

P

Cases

 

52

50

  

Age (years)

 

78.00 ± 6.95

80.04 ± 6.39

−1.542

0.126

Gender, n(%)

Male

8 (15.4)

10 (20.0)

0.374a

0.541

 

Female

44 (84.6)

40 (80.0)

  

BMI

 

27.26 ± 2.47

26.47 ± 2.35

1.641

0.104

Bone density, M(P1, P3)

 

−3.1 (− 4.05, − 2.65)

−3.4 (− 3.8, − 3)

−1.473

0.141

AO/OTA classification, n(%)

     
 

31-A1

1(1.9)

1(2.0)

0.049 a

0.976

 

31-A2

44(84.6)

43(86.0)

  
 

31-A3

7(13.5)

6(12.0)

  

Age-adjusted CCI

 

4.115 ± 1.06

4.4 ± 0.83

1.504

0.136

ASA score, n(%)

III

25(48.1)

22(44.0)

0.171 a

0.679

 

IV

27(51.9)

28(56.0)

  

Comorbidities diseases, n(%)

     
 

Cardiovascular

17(32.7)

18(36.0)

0.124 a

0.725

 

Respiratory

4((7.7)

6(12.0)

0.159b

0.690

 

Neurologic disease

5(9.6)

4(8.0)

0.004 b

0.951

 

Diabetes

15(28.8)

17(34.0)

0.315 a

0.575

 

Urinary

2(3.8)

3(6.0)

0.002 b

0.964

  1. Abbreviations M (P1, P3): median (P25%, P75%), CE: cement-enhanced internal fixation, HA: hemiarthroplasty, BMI: body mass index, CCI: Charlson’s comorbidity Index, ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system
  2. aChi-squared test, bUsing chi-squared test with Yates’ correction