Table 3 Participants rating of sample materials
Comprehension | Part 1 (n=24) | Part 2 (n=25) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Version 1 n(%) | Version 2 n(%) | p value | Version 1 n(%) | Version 2 n(%) | p value | |
Understanding of message | ||||||
1 (I don’t understand this message) | 1 (4.2) | 1 (4.2) | 0.5863* | 0 | 0 | 0.5393* |
2 | 4 (16.7) | 3 (12.5) | 1 (4) | 1 (4) | ||
3 | 6 (25.0) | 8 (33.3) | 7 (28) | 5 (20) | ||
4 | 4 (16.7) | 6 (25.0) | 9 (36) | 9 (36) | ||
5 (I completely understand this message) | 9 (37.5) | 6 (25.0) | 8 (32) | 9 (36) | ||
No response | 0 | 1(4) | ||||
Clarity of instructions** | ||||||
Yes | 23 (95.8) | 25 (100) | 24 (96) | |||
No | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Don’t know | 1 (4.2) | 0 | 0 | |||
No response | 0 | 1 (4) | ||||
Helps understand how patient compares | ||||||
Yes | 23 (95.8) | 21 (87.5) | 14 (56) | 23 (92) | ||
No | 0 | 0 | 8 (32) | 1 (4) | ||
Don’t know | 1 (4.2) | 2 (8.3) | 2 (8) | 1 (4) | ||
No response | 0 | 1 (4.2) | 1 (4) | 0 | ||
Usefulness | ||||||
Usefulness of information | ||||||
1 (Not useful at all) | 1 (4.2) | 2 (8.3) | 0.7011* | 1 (4) | 0 | 0.4856* |
2 | 1 (4.2) | 3 (12.5) | 3 (12) | 3 (12) | ||
3 | 10 (41.7) | 7 (29.2) | 6 (24) | 6 (24) | ||
4 | 7 (29.2) | 6 (25.0) | 10 (40) | 8 (32) | ||
5 (Very useful) | 5 (20.8) | 6 (25.0) | 5 (20) | 8 (32) | ||
Visual Appeal | ||||||
Visual appeal | ||||||
1 (Not visually appealing) | 0 | 5 (20.8) | 0.2906* | 0 | 0 | 0.9226* |
2 | 5 (20.8) | 2 (8.3) | 3 (12) | 4 (16) | ||
3 | 7 (29.2) | 7 (29.2) | 5 (20) | 3 (12) | ||
4 | 7 (29.2) | 7 (29.2) | 9 (36) | 11 (44) | ||
5 (Very visually appealing) | 5 (20.8) | 3 (12.5) | 8 (32) | 7 (28) | ||
Preferred material | ||||||
Overall | 14 (58.3) | 10 (41.7) | 0.5403*** | 9 (36) | 16 (64) | 0.23201*** |