Skip to main content

Table 2 Radiological parameters, instability, and ROM

From: Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes between open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and tibial condylar valgus osteotomy

 

HTO

TCVO

Pre-op

Post-op

Pre-op

Post-op

K/L grade

 (II/III/IV)

17/12/1

 

1/14/4a

 

%MA (%)

21.6 ± 11.0

64.7 ± 8.3b

10.8 ± 10.5d

59.8 ± 5.3b

FTA (°)

180.3 ± 3.5

169.1 ± 2.7b

183.7 ± 3.2d

170.9 ± 2.6b,e

HKA(°)

-6.3 ± 2.2

4.2 ± 2.2b

-9.0 ± 3.0d

3.5 ± 1.9b

Varus stress angle (°)

5.2 ± 0.9

6.6 ± 2.0

7.5 ± 1.4d

4.5 ± 1.8b,e

Valgus stress angle (°)

2.1 ± 2.1

0.9 ± 1.9

3.4 ± 2.3

1.2 ± 1.3b

Laxity angle (°)

7.0 ± 2.2

7.5 ± 3.1

10.9 ± 2.6d

5.6 ± 2.1b

JLCA (°)

1.4 ± 1.5

1.0 ± 0.9

4.9 ± 1.3d

0.8 ± 1.0c

ROM (°)

 Flexion

134.1 ± 10.2

137.6 ± 7.7

125.6 ± 13.0d

126.8 ± 10.3e

 Extension

-2.0 ± 5.1

-1.4 ± 3.5

-3.8 ± 3.9

-4.1 ± 3.6e

  1. aP < 0.01 compared to HTO
  2. bP < 0.05 compared to preoperatively
  3. cP < 0.01 compared to preoperatively
  4. dP < 0.01 compared to pre-HTO
  5. eP < 0.05 compared to post-HTO