Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of baseline characteristics of the primary and secondary outcomes between the intervention group (exercise therapy program) and the control group (training program) in participants with wrist osteoarthritis

From: Effects of a neuromuscular joint-protective exercise therapy program for treatment of wrist osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial

Outcome measure

Intervention group (n = 24)

Control group (n = 24)

p-value

PRWE

 Pain

31 [19–39]

31 [22–35]

0.81

 Function

20 [12–25]

25 [16–32]

0.17

 Total

51 [33–67]

56 [40–64]

0.54

DASH

31 [21–41]

36 [28–50]

0.29

NPRS

 At rest

3 [1–5]

3 [1–5]

0.86

 On motion without load

7 [4–8]

5 [3–8]

0.37

 On load

8 [7–9]

8 [5–8]

0.07

GSES

32 [28–36]

31 [27–35]

0.73

Wrist ROM (°)a

 Extension

43 [30–55]

50 [36–55]

0.63

 Flexion

40 [23–45]

30 [20–40]

0.18

 Radialdeviation

10 [5–10]

10 [5–10]

0.78

 Ulnardeviation

20 [15–25]

20 [20–30]

0.34

 Pronation

70 [60–70]

70 [61–74]

0.56

 Supination

78 [66–80]

75 [65–80]

0.43

Grip strengtha

28 [23–36]

26 [18–37]

0.70

  1. Values are medians and interquartile range [IQR], if not specified as degrees (°) 
  2. PRWE Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, DASH Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, NPRS Numerical Pain Rating Scale, GSES Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale, ROM Range of Motion
  3. aWrist ROM and grip strength were measured on the affected wrist and hand