Skip to main content

Table 2 Quantitative assessment of transitivity for mean age and gender of trial participants

From: Transitivity, coherence, and reliability of network meta-analyses comparing proximal humerus fracture treatments: a meta-epidemiological study

Comparison

RCTs

Participants

Age, years

Females, %

Mean (SD)

Difference

Included

Difference

Davey 2021

      

 HA:NOP

2

105

77.4 (NA)

reference

90

reference

 LCP:HA

1

32

71.6 (NA)

−5.7

84

−6 (ns)

 LCP:IMN

3

184

65.0 (NA)

−12.3

72

− 18 (*)

 LCP:NOP

3

197

73.0 (NA)

−4.4

87

−3 (ns)

 LCP:RSA

1

124

75.2 (6.4)

−2.2

90

0 (ns)

 RSA:HA

1

61

74.0 (NA)

−3.4

85

−5 (ns)

 RSA:NOP

1

59

83.5 (5.1)

6.2

86

−4 (ns)

Du 2017

      

 HA:NOP

2

105

77.4 (NA)

reference

90

reference

 ORIF:HA

1

32

71.6 (NA)

−5.7

84

−6 (ns)

 ORIF:NOP

3

149

73.5 (NA)

−3.9

85

−5 (ns)

 RSA:HA

1

61

74.0 (NA)

−3.4

85

−5 (ns)

Orman 2020

      

 HA:NOP

2

105

77.4 (NA)

reference

90

reference

 ORIF:HA

2

92

68.0 (NA)

−9.4

64

−26 (*)

 ORIF:NOP

3

149

73.5 (NA)

−3.9

85

−5 (ns)

 RSA:HA

1

61

74.0 (NA)

−3.4

85

−5 (ns)

  1. *: p < 0.001, ns: not significant, HA Hemi-arthroplasty, NOP Nonoperative, LCP Locking compression plate, IMN Intramedullary nail, RSA Reverse shoulder arthroplasty, ORIF Open reduction internal fixation, SD Standard deviation, NA Not available due to some studies not reporting standard deviations