Skip to main content

Table 1 The baseline characteristics of eligible trials and involved patients

From: Comparative efficacy and safety of medical treatments for proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Study

Region

Sample size

Age (years)

Male (%)

BMI (kg/m2)

DXA total body T score

Fracture pattern

Intervention

Control

Comparability of baseline characteristics

Follow-up (months)

Zyto 1997 [18]

Sweden

40 (20/20)

74.0

12.5

NA

NA

3, 4

ORIF (without strut graft)

Non-operative (sling for 7–10 days, then physiotherapy)

Balanced: age, gender, fracture, right: left side, dominant limb

50.0

Olerud 2011 [19]

Sweden

55 (27/28)

76.7

14.5

26.7

-1.5

4

HA

Non-operative (sling for 2 weeks, then rehabilitation regimen)

Balanced: age, gender, EQ-5Dindex score, nondominant arm, BMI, DXA total body T score; imbalanced: cognitive function

24.0

Olerud 2011 [20]

Sweden

60 (30/30)

73.9

18.3

26.3

-1.3

3

ORIF (with strut graft)

Non-operative (sling for 2 weeks, then physiotherapy)

Balanced: age, gender, cognitive function, EQ-5Dindex score, ADL, nondominant arm, BMI, DXA total body T score, and fracture type

24.0

Zhu 2011 [21]

China

51 (25/26)

52.6

33.3

NA

NA

2

IMN

ORIF (with strut graft)

Balanced: age, gender, dominant side, medial cortical comminution, interval between surgery and injury

36.0

Cai 2012 [22]

China

32 (13/19)

71.6

15.6

27.7

-1.2

4

ORIF (with strut graft)

HA

Balanced: age, gender, cognitive function, EQ-5Dindex score, ADL, nondominant arm, BMI, DXA total body T score

24.0

Boons 2012 [23]

Netherlands

50 (25/25)

78.2

6.0

NA

NA

4

HA

Non-operative (sling for 6 weeks)

Balanced: age, gender, VAS pain, VAS disability

12.0

Fjalestad 2014 [24]

Norway

50 (25/25)

72.6

12.0

NA

NA

B2/C2

ORIF

Non-operative (sling for 2 weeks, then rehabilitation regimen)

Balanced: age, gender, injured arm, dominant arm, fracture types, pre-fracture medical conditions, concomitant injuries, pre-fracture 15 D score, Constant score

24.0

Sebastia-Forcada 2014 [25]

Spain

62 (31/31)

74.0

14.5

NA

NA

3, 4

RTSA

HA

Balanced: age, gender, dominant side, neer fracture, rotator cuff

28.5

Gracitelli 2016 [26]

Brazil

72 (36/36)

65.5

27.7

NA

NA

2, 3

IMN

ORIF (with strut graft)

Balanced: age, gender, smoking, dominant arm, mechanism of injury, interval between surgery and injury, intraoperative rotator cuff, neer classification, coronal deviation, medial cortical comminution

12.0

Chen 2016 [27]

China

60 (30/30)

66.0

46.7

NA

NA

4

ORIF (with strut graft)

HA

Balanced: age, gender, dominant side, dual mineral absorptiometry, accident, length of calcar segment, displacement of medial hinge, glenohumeral dislocation, varus impacted, valgus impacted, the mean time between trauma and surgery; imbalanced: medial comminution, blood loss

24.0

Launonen 2019 [28]

Finland, Sweden, Denmark, Estonia

88 (44/44)

72.5

9.1

NA

NA

2

ORIF (with strut graft)

Non-operative (sling for 3 weeks, then rehabilitation regimen)

Balanced: age, gender, fracture type, dominant side, smoking, diabetes, neurological diseases, DASH, Oxford Shoulder Score, EQ-5Dindex score, 15D score

24.0

Lopiz 2019 [29]

Spain

59 (29/30)

83.5

13.6

NA

NA

3, 4

RTSA

Non-operative (sling for 3 weeks, then rehabilitation regimen)

Balanced: gender, dominant side, Charlson Comorbidity Index, fracture type; imbalanced: age

12.0

Plath 2019 [30]

Germany

68 (36/32)

75.6

25.0

NA

NA

3

IMN

ORIF (with strut graft)

Balanced: age, gender, right/left ratio, dominant side, ASA physical status classification, neer classification, AO classification

12.0

Fraser 2020 [31]

Norway

124 (64/60)

75.2

10.5

NA

NA

B2/C2

RTSA

ORIF (with strut graft)

Balanced: age, gender, living situation, diabetes, smoking, ASA class, time from injury to operation, OTA/AO fracture, injured arm, diminant arm; imbalanced: type of injury

24.0

Ramo 2020 [32]

Finland

82 (38/44)

49.0

53.7

27.9

NA

A/B/C

ORIF (with strut graft)

Non-operative (sling for 3 weeks, then rehabilitation regimen)

Balanced: age, gender, weight, height, BMI, smoking, radial nerve, AO/OTA classification, fracture location, injury mechanism, dominant limb, preinjury DASH score, optional work module, optional sports or performing arts module, preinjury 15D score

12.0

Helfen 2020 [33]

Germany

60 (30/30)

75.0

33.3

NA

NA

2

IMN

ORIF (with strut graft)

Balanced: age, gender, time to surgery

24.0

Jonsson 2021 [34]

Sweden

84 (41/43)

79.5

9.5

NA

NA

3, 4

RTSA

HA

Balanced: age, gender, right side dominant, dominant side injured, EQ-5Dindex score, injury type, days from injury to surgery, duration of surgery in minutes, and study center

24.0

Boyer 2021 [35]

France

85 (43/42)

73.7

28.2

NA

NA

3, 4

IMN

ORIF (with strut graft)

Balanced: age, gender, injury type

66.0

  1. *ADL: activities of daily living; BMI: body mass index; DASH: Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; DXA: dual-emission X-ray absorptiometry; HA: Hemi-Arthroplasty; IMN: Intramedullary nail; ORIF: Open reduction and internal fixation; RTSA: Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty