Skip to main content

Table 1 Study/patient characteristics

From: Inconsistent radiographic diagnostic criteria for lisfranc injuries: a systematic review

Study

LoE

Lisfranc injuries (n)

Gender (male; female)

Mean age, years (range)

Follow-up, months (range)

Faciszewski et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990. [16]

4

15

10; 5

38.7 (19 to 75)

24 to 156

Curtis et al. Am J Sports Med. 1993. [17]

4

19

14; 5

25.5 (17 to 42)

25 (15 to 45)a

Shapiro et al. Am J Sports Med. 1994. [18]

4

9

5; 4

23.7 (18 to 45)

34.1 (12 to 52)a

Kinik et al. Foot Ankle Surg. 1999. [19]

4

11

8; 3

31.2 (16 to 44)

40.8a

Nunley and Vertullo. Am J Sports Med. 2002. [20]

3

15

13; 2

21 (15 to 32)

27 (9 to 72)a

Perugia et al. Int Orthop. 2003. [21]

4

42

28; 14

37.7 (17 to 70)

58.4 (24 to 84)a

Ly and Coetzee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006. [22]

1

41

NR

32.4 (19 to 52)

42.5 (25 to 60)a

Reinhardt et al. Foot Ankle Int. 2012. [23]

3

25

8; 17

46 (20 to 73)b

42 (24 to 96)a

Crates et al. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015. [24]

3

36

18; 18

Sx, 29.6 (16 to 57);

Cx, 36.7 (15 to 63)a

Sx, 33 (12 to 60);

Cx, 36 (12 to 59)a

Miyamoto et al. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015. [25]

4

5

4; 1

19.4 (17 to 21)

18.8 (12 to 26)a

Cassinelli et al. Foot Ankle Int. 2016. [26]

4

8

1; 7

39.8 (18 to 60)

37.2 (24 to 69.6)a

Del Vecchio et al. Adv Orthop. 2016. [27]

4

5

1; 4

42.4 (25 to 67)

19.4 (18 to 21)a

Lien et al. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017. [28]

4

10

7; 3

35.2 (19 to 72)

6c

Seo et al. Foot Ankle Int. 2017. [29]

3

51

28; 23

34.5 (NR)

NR

Gee et al. Curr Orthop Pract. 2019. [30]

3

12

10; 2

SF, 25.7 (NR);

SB, 29.7 (NR)

12.3 (5.6 to 30.0)a

Pigott et al. Foot Ankle Spec. 2019. [31]

3

45

22; 23

35.8 (19 to 60)

31.4 (6 to 119)a

Porter et al. Foot Ankle Int. 2019. [32]

4

82

64; 18

21.0 (12 to 40)

TD, > 12; MCD, > 12; PED, 6 to 12c

Ren et al. Chin J Traumatol. 2019. [33]

3

61

38; 23

39.4 (19 to 64)

12.3 (10 to 16)a

Chen et al. Foot Ankle Int. 2020. [34]

3

26

5; 21

45.9 (17 to 77)

54 (30 to 95)a

Cho et al. Foot Ankle Int. 2020. [35]

3

63

39; 24

SF 37.9 (18 to 65);

SB 40.9 (20 to 69)

16 (12 to 26)a

Thomas et al. Foot Ankle Spec. 2020. [36]

4

100

50; 50

Male 34.3 (19 to 76); Female 34.5 (19 to 69)

NR

Arzac Ulla I. Foot Ankle Surg. 2021. [37]

4

14

10; 4

32 (NR)

24b

Chen et al. Injury. 2021. [38]

3

32

23; 9

ORIF 42.8 (36.2 to 49.4);

PRIF 36.4 (28.8 to 44.0);

43 (35.6 to 50.4)a

Eceviz et al. J Invest Surg. 2021. [39]

3

62

44; 18

38 (18 to 68)

57 (24 to 155)a

Garríguez-Pérez et al. Foot Ankle Int. 2021. [40]

4

42

15; 27

49 (NR)

51.6 (12—96)a

Mosca et al. Injury. 2021. [41]

4

15

8; 7

48.2 (26 to 68)

45.6 (12 to 72)a

So et al. Foot Ankle Spec. 2021. [42]

3

196

85; 111

ORIF 35.8 (NR);

PA 48.6 (NR)

ORIF 15.3 (18.9); PA 20.4 (28.3)a

De Bruijn et al. Injury. 2022. [43]

3

26

12; 10

42.6 (NR)

NR

Rikken et al. Injury. 2022. [44]

3

47

30; 17

32.6 (16 to 71)

NR

  1. Cx Conservative treatment, NR Not reported, ORIF Open reduction and internal fixation, PA Primary arthrodesis, PRIF Percutaneous reduction and internal fixation, SB Suture button fixation, SF Screw fixation, Sx Surgical treatment
  2. aMean
  3. bMedian
  4. cFinal