From: Inconsistent radiographic diagnostic criteria for lisfranc injuries: a systematic review
Study | LoE | Lisfranc injuries (n) | Gender (male; female) | Mean age, years (range) | Follow-up, months (range) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Faciszewski et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990. [16] | 4 | 15 | 10; 5 | 38.7 (19 to 75) | 24 to 156 |
Curtis et al. Am J Sports Med. 1993. [17] | 4 | 19 | 14; 5 | 25.5 (17 to 42) | 25 (15 to 45)a |
Shapiro et al. Am J Sports Med. 1994. [18] | 4 | 9 | 5; 4 | 23.7 (18 to 45) | 34.1 (12 to 52)a |
Kinik et al. Foot Ankle Surg. 1999. [19] | 4 | 11 | 8; 3 | 31.2 (16 to 44) | 40.8a |
Nunley and Vertullo. Am J Sports Med. 2002. [20] | 3 | 15 | 13; 2 | 21 (15 to 32) | 27 (9 to 72)a |
Perugia et al. Int Orthop. 2003. [21] | 4 | 42 | 28; 14 | 37.7 (17 to 70) | 58.4 (24 to 84)a |
Ly and Coetzee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006. [22] | 1 | 41 | NR | 32.4 (19 to 52) | 42.5 (25 to 60)a |
Reinhardt et al. Foot Ankle Int. 2012. [23] | 3 | 25 | 8; 17 | 46 (20 to 73)b | 42 (24 to 96)a |
Crates et al. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015. [24] | 3 | 36 | 18; 18 | Sx, 29.6 (16 to 57); Cx, 36.7 (15 to 63)a | Sx, 33 (12 to 60); Cx, 36 (12 to 59)a |
Miyamoto et al. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015. [25] | 4 | 5 | 4; 1 | 19.4 (17 to 21) | 18.8 (12 to 26)a |
Cassinelli et al. Foot Ankle Int. 2016. [26] | 4 | 8 | 1; 7 | 39.8 (18 to 60) | 37.2 (24 to 69.6)a |
Del Vecchio et al. Adv Orthop. 2016. [27] | 4 | 5 | 1; 4 | 42.4 (25 to 67) | 19.4 (18 to 21)a |
Lien et al. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017. [28] | 4 | 10 | 7; 3 | 35.2 (19 to 72) | 6c |
Seo et al. Foot Ankle Int. 2017. [29] | 3 | 51 | 28; 23 | 34.5 (NR) | NR |
Gee et al. Curr Orthop Pract. 2019. [30] | 3 | 12 | 10; 2 | SF, 25.7 (NR); SB, 29.7 (NR) | 12.3 (5.6 to 30.0)a |
Pigott et al. Foot Ankle Spec. 2019. [31] | 3 | 45 | 22; 23 | 35.8 (19 to 60) | 31.4 (6 to 119)a |
Porter et al. Foot Ankle Int. 2019. [32] | 4 | 82 | 64; 18 | 21.0 (12 to 40) | TD, > 12; MCD, > 12; PED, 6 to 12c |
Ren et al. Chin J Traumatol. 2019. [33] | 3 | 61 | 38; 23 | 39.4 (19 to 64) | 12.3 (10 to 16)a |
Chen et al. Foot Ankle Int. 2020. [34] | 3 | 26 | 5; 21 | 45.9 (17 to 77) | 54 (30 to 95)a |
Cho et al. Foot Ankle Int. 2020. [35] | 3 | 63 | 39; 24 | SF 37.9 (18 to 65); SB 40.9 (20 to 69) | 16 (12 to 26)a |
Thomas et al. Foot Ankle Spec. 2020. [36] | 4 | 100 | 50; 50 | Male 34.3 (19 to 76); Female 34.5 (19 to 69) | NR |
Arzac Ulla I. Foot Ankle Surg. 2021. [37] | 4 | 14 | 10; 4 | 32 (NR) | 24b |
Chen et al. Injury. 2021. [38] | 3 | 32 | 23; 9 | ORIF 42.8 (36.2 to 49.4); PRIF 36.4 (28.8 to 44.0); | 43 (35.6 to 50.4)a |
Eceviz et al. J Invest Surg. 2021. [39] | 3 | 62 | 44; 18 | 38 (18 to 68) | 57 (24 to 155)a |
Garríguez-Pérez et al. Foot Ankle Int. 2021. [40] | 4 | 42 | 15; 27 | 49 (NR) | 51.6 (12—96)a |
Mosca et al. Injury. 2021. [41] | 4 | 15 | 8; 7 | 48.2 (26 to 68) | 45.6 (12 to 72)a |
So et al. Foot Ankle Spec. 2021. [42] | 3 | 196 | 85; 111 | ORIF 35.8 (NR); PA 48.6 (NR) | ORIF 15.3 (18.9); PA 20.4 (28.3)a |
De Bruijn et al. Injury. 2022. [43] | 3 | 26 | 12; 10 | 42.6 (NR) | NR |
Rikken et al. Injury. 2022. [44] | 3 | 47 | 30; 17 | 32.6 (16 to 71) | NR |