Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of baseline characteristics

From: Vertebral compression fractures: pain relief, progression and new fracture rate comparing vertebral augmentation with brace

VARIABLE

OVERALL (n = 573)

CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT (n = 489)

SURGICAL TREATMENT (n = 84)

p value

Mean Age, yr (SD)

74.5 (10.3)

74.6 (10.4)

73.8 (10.0)

0.497

Gender Female, n (%)

411 (71.7)

351 (71.8)

60 (71.4)

0.947

History of cancer, n (%)

115 (20.1)

96 (19.3)

19 (22.6)

0.528

Chronic steroid treatment, n (%)

77 (13.4)

67 (13.7)

10 (11.9)

0.656

Previous fracture, n (%)

163 (28.5)

128 (26.2)

35 (41.6)

0.004

Osteoporosis-diagnosis, n (%)

195 (34.0)

160 (32.7)

35 (41.7)

0.110

Osteoporosis-therapy, n (%)

180 (31.7)

150 (31.0)

30 (35.7)

0.390

Mechanism of fracture, n (%)

   

0.326

Spontaneous

137 (24.0)

115 (23.5)

22 (26.2)

 

Fall

346 (60.5)

293 (59.9)

53 (63.1)

 

Overexertion

59 (10.3)

51 (10.4)

8 (9.5)

 

High-energy trauma

30 (5.2)

29 (5.9)

1 (1.2)

 

Spine segment, n (%)

   

0.893

Dorsal

219 (38.2)

186 (38.0)

33 (39.3)

 

Lumbar

292 (51.0)

251 (51.3)

41 (48.8)

 

Dorsal & lumbar

62 (10.8)

52 (10.6)

10 (11.9)

 

Posterior wall injury (type A3 & A4 AOSpine classification), n (%)

121 (22.3)

96 (20.9)

25 (29.8)

0.073

Multiple level, n (%)

134 (23.4)

110 (22.5)

24 (28.6)

0.224

Midline spine tenderness, n (%)

382 (72.3)

315 (70.6)

67 (81.7)

0.039

Median follow-up, wk (IQR)

20.5 (12; 29)

21 (13; 29)

15 (8; 27)

0.155

  1. IQR: interquartile range; SD: standard deviation; wk: week; yr: year