Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison between the two groups

From: Impact of spinal surgery on locomotive syndrome in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis in clinical decision limit stage 3: a retrospective study

 

Improvement group (N = 32)

Non-improvement group (N = 39)

P

Median

Range (min–max)

Median

Range (min–max)

 

Age (years)

75

65–81

78

67–91

0.008*

Sex (Male/Female)

14/18

 

13/26

 

0.4

BMI (kg/m2)

22.8

15.4–32.1

24.2

17.7–31.2

0.3

Limb skeletal muscle mass (kg)

14.9

9.8–23.3

13.9

8.9–21.9

0.3

Trunk skeletal muscle mass (kg)

16.8

12.4–23.3

16.5

11.7–23.7

0.3

Hand grip strength (kg)

23.3

12.8–44

20.6

8.1–43

0.1

TUG (s)

9.6

5.4–21.5

14.5

6.4–38.4

0.0002*

LSA

54

4.5–120

37.5

0–110

0.02

PNI

52.4

36.9–64.9

51.2

36.2–60.5

0.2

Low back pain (VAS)

51

8–100

67

0–100

0.2

Lower limb pain (VAS)

65

18–100

69.5

0–100

0.8

Lower limb numbness (VAS)

51

0–100

65.5

0–100

0.4

GLFS-25

40

24–65

58

25–87

0.002*

Surgery (decompression/fusion/decompression and fusion)

19/10/3

 

28/7/4

 

0.4227

Patient’s symptoms (neuropathic/cauda equina/mixed symptoms)

15/8/9

 

19/16/4

 

0.1101

  1. Abbreviations: BMI body mass index, TUG Timed Up and Go test, LSA life-space assessment, PNI prognostic nutritional index, VAS visual analog scale, GLFS-25 the 25-Question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale
  2. *Indicates statistical significance