Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of perioperative outcomes between the PTED group and the PIED group

From: Surgical outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in obese adolescents with lumbar disc herniation

Parameter

PTED group

PIED group

P

Patients

  

0.634

 Obese

15

4

 

 Normal

22

6

 

Sex

  

0.011

 Female (No.)

12

8

 

 Male (No.)

25

2

 

Age (y)

16.3 ± 2.4

15.1 ± 2.8

0.190

Operative time (min)

92.0 ± 12.4

91.0 ± 13.9

0.822

Fluoroscopic exposures (n)

35.5 ± 8.0

30.1 ± 3.4

0.043

Hospital stay (days)

3.2 ± 0.5

2.9 ± 0.3

0.066

Time to ambulation (days)

27.5 ± 4.1

25.5 ± 4.2

0.178

Anesthesia method

 

<0.001

 General anesthesia

3

10

 

 Local anesthesia

34

0

 

Complications

 

1.000

 Wound infection

0

0

 

 Dural tear

0

0

 

 Nerve root injury

0

0

 

 Major vessel injury

0

0

 

 Urinary injury

0

0

 

 Revision surgery

1

0

 
  1. PTED, percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy; PIED, percutaneous interlaminar endoscopic discectomy. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant