Skip to main content

Table 11 MTT test joint angle value changes compared with the mean value results

From: Effect of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization combined with blood flow restriction training on function, pain and strength of patients with patellofemoral joint pain

Group

Projects

Before treatment

After the first treatment

After the final treatment

Multiple are comparable

M ± SD

M ± SD

M ± SD

Test group (n = 13)

Knee extension angle

123.36 ± 7.62

103.88 ± 7.35*&

102.26 ± 7.23*&

Before treatment > after the first treatment > after 4 weeks of treatment

Hip abduction angle

29.67 ± 10.57

13.67 ± 4.92*a

7.13 ± 4.24*a

Before treatment > after the first treatment > after 4 weeks of treatment

Knee joint offset angle

16.92 ± 10.51

7.78 ± 3.60*a

5.38 ± 3.13*a

Before treatment > after the first treatment > after 4 weeks of treatment

Control group (n = 13)

Knee Extension

125.69 ± 4.89

105.15 ± 4.23*a

99.85 ± 6.26*a

Before treatment > after the first treatment > after 4 weeks of treatment

Hip abduction angle

40.21 ± 15.06

13.53 ± 6.25*a

8.47 ± 3.01*a

Before treatment > after the first treatment > after 4 weeks of treatment

Knee joint offset angle

12.66 ± 4.72

6.12 ± 2.76*&

5.43 ± 2.89*&

Before treatment > after the first treatment > after 4 weeks of treatment

  1. *Represents significant difference in angular change compared to pre-treatment in within-group comparisons (p < 0.05)
  2. &Represents no significant change in within-group comparisons at different time points (p > 0.05); M ± SD indicates mean ± standard deviation
  3. aRepresents significant difference in angular change after first treatment and 4 weeks of treatment in within-group comparisons (p < 0.05)