Effectiveness of rehabilitation for working-age patients after a total hip arthroplasty: a comparison of usual care between the Netherlands and Germany

Table 3 Percentages of satisfied patients

	4 weeks	12 weeks	6 months
Function in ADL
Cut-off value, ROC curve	68.4	81.6	86.0
AUC (95% CI)	0.74 (0.65–0.83)	0.85 (0.75–0.95)	0.77 (0.63–0.91)
Responder (%, Netherlands/Germany)	40.3%/50.0%	47.5%/65.6%	58.1%/69.4%
Odds ratio (95% CI)	1.53 (0.75–3.12)	2.10 (1.01–4.36)	1.64 (0.78–3.42)
Odds ratio adjusted (95% CI)^a	1.16 (0.52–2.57)	2.15 (0.94–4.91)	2.44 (1.01–5.89)

Percentages of satisfied patients (those patients who were “very satisfied” or “somewhat satisfied”), cut-off values of subdomain function in ADL of the HOOS by ROC curve, and percentages of patients who were “responders” (those patients scoring above the cut-off value), at 4 weeks (T), 12 weeks (T2), and 6 months (T3). The odds of being a responder were calculated with a logistic regression
Significant at 0.05 bolded
Abbreviations: ADL activities of daily living, AUC area under the curve, CI confidence interval, PASS patient acceptable symptom state, ROC: receiving operating characteristics
^aAdjusted for gender, BMI, educational level, and ASA classification

ISSN: 1471-2474