Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient characteristics

From: Development and validation of a machine learning model to predict imminent new vertebral fractures after vertebral augmentation

 

Training set (n = 138)

Internal validation set (n = 59)

External validation set (n = 38)

Characteristic

without NVFs

NVFs

without NVFs

NVFs

without NVFs

NVFs

Age, yr

 Mean (± SD)

70.9 (± 8.6)

75.8 (± 8.3)

72.4 (± 10.2)

75.3 (± 7.8)

74.8 (± 6.8)

78.1 (± 7.4)

Sex

 Male

16 (25.0)

14 (18.9)

7 (25.9)

9 (28.1)

4 (17.4)

3 (20.0)

 Female

48 (75.0)

60 (81.1)

20 (74.1)

23 (71.9)

19 (82.6)

12 (80.0)

Surgical procedure

 VP

32 (50.0)

49 (66.2)

20 (74.1)

23 (71.9)

17 (73.9)

10 (66.7)

 BKP

32 (50.0)

25 (33.8)

7 (25.9)

9 (28.1)

6 (26.1)

5 (33.3)

Number of treated vertebra(e)

 1

55 (85.9)

63 (85.1)

21 (77.8)

22 (68.8)

21 (91.3)

12 (80.0)

  ≥ 2

9(14.1)

11 (14.9)

6 (8.1)

10 (31.2)

2 (8.7)

3 (20.0)

Location of treated vertebra(e)

 non-TL-Junction

19 (29.7)

35 (47.3)

5 (18.5)

14 (43.8)

7 (30.4)

5 (33.3)

 TL-Junction

45 (70.3)

39 (52.7)

22 (81.5)

18 (56.2)

16 (69.6)

10 (66.7)

IVC

 Negative

60 (93.8)

47 (63.5)

25 (92.6)

25 (78.1)

19 (82.6)

9 (60.0)

 Positive

4(6.2)

27 (36.5)

2 (7.4)

7 (21.9)

4 (17.4)

6 (40.0)

Previous VF

 Negative

46 (71.9)

33 (44.6)

22 (81.5)

12 (37.5)

19 (82.6)

9 (60.0)

 Positive

18(28.1)

41 (55.4)

5 (18.5)

20 (62.5)

4 (17.4)

6 (40.0)

Previous Multi-VF

 Negative

57 (89.1)

52 (70.3)

26 (96.3)

25 (78.1)

22 (95.7)

13 (86.7)

 Positive

7 (10.9)

22 (29.7)

1 (3.7)

7 (21.9)

1 (4.3)

2 (13.3)

  1. Except where indicated, data are numbers of patients, with percentages in parentheses
  2. NVF new vertebral fracture, VF vertebral fracture, VP vertebroplasty, BKP Balloon Kyphoplasty, TL-Junction The treated vertebrae located at the level of T12-L2, IVC intravertebral cleft