Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of efforts to promote practically identical clinical practice exercise programmes

From: Protocol of identical exercise programs with and without specific breathing techniques for the treatment of chronic non-specific low back pain: randomized feasibility trial with two-month follow-up

Clinical entity

Aim

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Include only subjects who are adults with low back pain lasting more than three months (pain sensation more than three days per week) to promote a uniform pain population

Exclude known cardiovascular, respiratory, rheumatic and neurological diseases potentially affecting breathing mechanics and hence potentially affecting the effects of SBTs

Clinical assessment before inclusion

Include only participants with movement control impairment with exactly similar test batteries to promote homogeneity of treatment and physical performance heterogeneity between the groups

Include only participants with non-specific CLBP, excluding participants with symptomatic nerve root pathology due to intervertebral disc herniation or lumbar spinal stenosis

Single-clinician study design

The aim is to minimize the intervention differences and effects of contextual factors of clinic settings, such as environment, interior design and therapists’ behaviour, communication and approach to treatment

Exercise

The research appointment follows a similar frequency over eight weeks with the aim of uniform treatment between groups

There will be a similar number of exercises delivered to the subject in each clinical visit to promote uniform treatment between groups

Clinical instructions for both groups concentrate on the treatment of movement control impairment

The exact exercises are chosen according to individual movement impairment, but similar exercises are emphasized for all participants

Identical general instructions for both groups

Other interventions

The aim is to exclude other evidence-based interventions in order to evaluate more precisely the outcome differences of the study groups