Skip to main content

Table 1 Basic information on patients, Mechanism of injury, Gender, BMI, ASA, and Classification of fracture

From: The comparison of the Effect of double reverse traction repositor (DRTR) and traction table assisted Anterograde Intramedullary nail in treatment of femoral shaft fractures

 

Total patient (n = 44)

DRTR

(n = 23)

Traction table (n = 21)

P value

Gender (%)

   

0.870a

 Male

34 (77.3)

18 (78.3)

16 (77.2)

 

 Female

10 (22.7)

5 (21.7)

5 (23.8)

 

Age (years), mean ± SD

37.6 ± 17.8

39.6 ± 17.2

35.4 ± 18.6

0.192c

BMI, mean ± SD

23.2 ± 3.8

23.3 ± 3.8

23.1 ± 3.9

0.549c

ASA(%)

   

1.000b

 1–2

37 (84.1)

19 (82.6)

18 (85.7)

 

 3–4

7 (15.9)

4 (17.4)

3 (14.3)

 

Damage mechanism (%)

   

0.853a

 High energy

32 (72.7)

17 (73.9)

15 (71.4)

 

 Low energy

12 (27.3)

6 (26.1)

6 (28.6)

 

AO Classification (%)

   

0.392a

 A

28 (63.6)

16 (69.5)

12 (57.1)

 

 B

16 (36.4)

7 (30.5)

9 (42.9)

 

Follow-up time,

mean ± SD

13.5 ± 5.6

11.6 ± 3.6

15.5 ± 6.7

0.054c

  1. (a) Pearson Chi-Square test; (b) Fisher exact test; (c) Mann-Whitney U test; (d) Student t test