Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparisons between the unplanned thrombin-gelatin matrix usage group and the routine usage group

From: Predictors for hemostatic thrombin-gelatin matrix usage in spine surgery: a multicenter observational study

 

Unplanned TGM usage

Routine TGM usage

p

n

714

1220

 

Age (yrs)

64.9 (16.5)

65.4 (16.1)

0.76

Sex (male, %)

55.3%

59.3%

0.08

BMI

24.3 (4.3)

23.9 (4.2)

0.11

Smoking

11.9%

9.5%

0.10

ASA ≥ 2

85.4%

85.5%

0.97

Diabetes mellitus

17.5%

18.0%

0.77

Rheumatoid arthritis

2.8%

3.9%

0.22

Anticoagulation

18.1%

13.6%

0.008

Number of levels operated

3.5 (2.3)

3.3 (1.9)

0.83

Cervical

20.0%

22.8%

0.16

Thoracic

15.8%

13.2%

0.11

Lumbar

72.7%

71.4%

0.54

Degenerative

73.0%

76.0%

0.14

Trauma

5.0%

5.1%

0.97

Deformity

7.8%

5.2%

0.02

Infection

1.4%

2.2%

0.21

Tumor

5.3%

3.9%

0.13

Ligamentous ossification

2.9%

4.0%

0.22

Anterior approach

4.1%

5.3%

0.21

Posterior approach

89.4%

90.1%

0.61

Emergency

9.5%

10.7%

0.40

Revision

17.1%

14.5%

0.13

Durotomy

10.6%

8.8%

0.17

Instrumentation

37.4%

41.9%

0.05

Interbody fusion

19.0%

23.2%

0.03

Osteotomy

3.6%

1.3%

< 0.001

Microendoscopy

44.1%

23.5%

< 0.001

  1. TGM: thrombin-gelatin matrix, BMI: body mass index, ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification