Skip to main content

Table 4 Summary of previous reports of normal radiographic acetabular parameters regarding race, number of samples, age, and reason for the radiograph

From: Standard radiographic values for the acetabulum in Japanese adolescents: a cross-sectional study

Author (Year)

Race

Number of hips

Age (Mean), years

Reason for the radiograph

LCEA (°)

Tönnis angle (°)

Sharp angle (°)

     

M

F

M

F

M

F

Nakamura (1989) [24]

Japanese

254

40 to 69 (54)

Other diseases

32.3

32.1

4.6

5.4

37.3

38.6

Yoshimura (1998) [25]

British

1498

66 to 67 (66)

Urography

36

37

    

Japanese

198

67 to 70 (69)

Urography

31

31

    

Han (1998) [26]

Korean

591

22 to 88 (52)

Other diseases

32.6

32.2

5.2

8.0

36.5

37.5

Inoue (2000) [27]

French

401

20 to 79

Urography

37.8

36.9

    

Japanese

782

20 to 79

Urography

35.1

32.8

    

Jacobsen (2005) [28]

Danish

4151

M: 23 to 93 (62)

F: 22 to 92 (65)

City health study

R: 35.0

L: 34.0

R: 35.0

L: 35.0

  

R: 37.0

L: 37.0

R: 39.1

L: 38.0

Umer (2006) [29]

Singaporean

522

16 to 99 (60)

Other diseases

30.6

33.5

7.8

7.8

  

Im (2010) [30]

Korean

428

17 to 90 (52)

Other diseases

38.0

37.8

    
  1. M male, F female, R right, L left, LCEA lateral center–edge angle