Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Comparison of suture-bridge and independent double-row techniques for medium to massive posterosuperior cuff tears: a two-year retrospective study

Original Submission
15 Nov 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Jan 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
4 Jan 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
7 Jan 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
9 Jan 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
13 Jan 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
13 Jan 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
16 Jan 2023 Author responded Author comments - Joe Chih-Hao Chiu
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Jan 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 Jan 2023 Author responded Author comments - Joe Chih-Hao Chiu
Resubmission - Version 4
19 Jan 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 4
24 Jan 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
25 Jan 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
26 Jan 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
28 Jan 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
28 Jan 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
5 Feb 2023 Author responded Author comments - Joe Chih-Hao Chiu
Resubmission - Version 5
5 Feb 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 5
8 Feb 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
9 Feb 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
12 Feb 2023 Author responded Author comments - Joe Chih-Hao Chiu
Resubmission - Version 6
12 Feb 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 6
13 Feb 2023 Author responded Author comments - Joe Chih-Hao Chiu
Resubmission - Version 7
13 Feb 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 7
16 Feb 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
20 Feb 2023 Editorially accepted
28 Feb 2023 Article published 10.1186/s12891-023-06256-6

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page