Table 1 Epidemiologic data, clinical outcome and indications for revision surgery
Coptos cup group(no = 29) | KE ring group(no = 13) | Total(no = 42) | |
|---|---|---|---|
Age | 47.83 ± 14.6 | 50.85 ± 11.3 | 48.76 ± 13.6 |
Gender | |||
Female | 14 | 6 | 20 |
Male | 15 | 7 | 22 |
Side | |||
Right | 13 | 6 | 20 |
Left | 15 | 7 | 22 |
Follow up (Months) | 54.2 ± 20.6 | 49.6 ± 23 | 52.8 ± 21 |
Preoperative HHS | 67.7 ± 8.57 | 58.4 ± 4.35 | 64.8 ± 8.6 |
Postoperative HHS | 91.8 ± 5.9 | 92.2 ± 5.4 | 91.9 ± 5.68 |
Size of acetabular implants | 58.8 ± 5.56 | 55.54 ± 3.6(48.7 ± 3.3 cemented DM CUPS) | |
Indications for revisions | Revision for aseptic loosening of cemented/cementless THR (15 cases) | Revision for aseptic loosening of cemented/cementless THR (6 cases) | 21 |
Single Stage Revision PJI (4 cases) | Single Stage Revision PJI (1 case) | 5 | |
Aseptic loosening in Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty with acetabular defect (5 cases) | Aseptic loosening in Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty with acetabular defect (4 cases) | 9 | |
Aseptic loosening of THA Originally performed following failed fixation of hip fractures (5 cases) | Aseptic loosening of THA previously originally performed following failed fixation of hip fractures (2 cases) | 7 | |