Skip to main content

Table 4 Summary of study characteristics

From: Rehabilitation for revision total knee replacement: survey of current service provision and systematic review

Author

Country

Study dates

Setting

Study design

Inclusion

Number recruited

Mean age

% female

Intervention description

Follow up

Relevant outcomes

Losses to follow up

MINOR study quality score

Key results

Larsen et al., 2002 [20]

Denmark

February 2017-June 2018

Inpatient rehabilitation hospital

Retrospective hospital register-based cohort study

Patients aged 40–80 years with complications after primary or revision TKR

51 revision TKR patients

62 years

59% female

3 weeks of group-based and personalized rehabilitation supervised by physiotherapists. Groups consisted of 11 participants, with 2–4 sessions daily, each lasting 30–50 min. Sessions targeted neuromuscular function, postural control, flexibility, muscle strength, cardiovascular function, gait retraining and education. Exercises included pelvic lifts, sit-ups, sliding exercises, lunges, rubber band exercises, and functional movements like chair stands and stair climbing. Exercises were adjusted based on individual level

Hospital discharge

KOOS, pain NRS, 6-min walk test, stair climb test, knee range of motion

27% (from whole cohort of primary and revision TKR)

MINORS score of 11

Patients reported statistically significant improvements in all outcome measures

Vincent et al., 2006 [19]

USA

January 2002-March 2005

Inpatient rehabilitation hospital

Retrospective cohort study using computerized medical records

Patients with primary or revision TKR

138 revision TKR patients

Mean age not reported

70% (primary and revision TKR patients)

3 h of supervised therapy daily from both physical and occupational therapists (2 sessions per day) until discharge. Sessions focused on flexibility, range of motion, activities of daily living, gait, balance and proprioception. Patients also used a continuous passive motion machine for 6–8 h daily

Hospital discharge

FIM score

Losses to follow up not reported

MINORS score of 7

FIM scores improved significantly from admission to hospital discharge

Walker et al., 2001 [18]

USA

1994–1998

Inpatient rehabilitation hospital

Retrospective cohort study using computerized medical records and patient charts

Patients with primary or revision THR

39 revision THR patients

74 years

80% female

3 years of daily supervised rehabilitation involving occupational therapy, physical therapy, and standard THA range-of-motion precautions. One hour of the therapy time was in a structured group session

Hospital discharge

FIM score

Losses to follow up not reported

MINORS score of 7

FIM scores improved from admission to hospital discharge