Skip to main content

Table 3 Pedro’s scores of each included study

From: Comparative short-term effectiveness of non-surgical treatments for insertional Achilles tendinopathy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Author (year)

Criteria for PEDRO scale a

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

Kedia et al. (2014) [23]

√

√

√

√

x

√

x

√

√

√

√

Notarnicola et al. (2012) [24]

√

√

√

√

√

x

√

√

√

√

√

Notarnicola et al. (2014) [25]

√

√

√

√

x

x

√

√

√

√

√

Pinitkwamdee et al. (2020) [26]

√

√

√

√

√

x

√

√

√

√

√

Mansur et al. (2021) [11]

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Horstmann et al. (2013) [27]

√

√

√

√

x

x

√

√

√

√

√

Gatz, Matthias et al. (2020) [28]

√

√

√

√

x

x

x

√

√

√

√

McCormack et al. (2016) [29]

√

√

√

√

x

x

x

√

√

√

√

Rompe et al. (2008) [30]

√

√

√

√

x

x

x

√

√

√

√

  1. a1: eligibility criteria were specified; 2: subjects were randomly allocated to groups; 3: allocation was concealed; 4: the groups were similar at baseline regarding the most important prognostic indicators; 5: there was blinding of all subjects; 6: there was blinding of all therapists who administered the therapy; 7: there was blinding of all assessors who measured at least one key outcome; 8: measures of at least one key outcome were obtained from more than one of the subjects initially allocated to groups; 9: all subjects for whom outcome measures were available received the treatment or control condition as allocated or, where this was not the case, data for at least one key outcome was analysed by"intention to treat"; 10: the results of between-group statistical comparisons are reported for at least one key outcome; 11: the study provides both point measures and measures of variability for at least one key outcome