Skip to main content

Table 1 The demographic characteristics of the patients

From: Is the reconstruction of medial support important for revision following failed treatment of femoral trochanteric fractures? a retrospective comparative study

 

Medial support group

(n = 16)

Non-medial support group

(n = 15)

P-value*

Sex (n)

  

1

Male/female

11/5

11/4

 

Age (y)

55.8 ± 11.9

60.5 ± 20.3

0.4362

BMI (kg/m2)

24.6 ± 3.8

23.8 ± 3.4

0.586

Cause of injury (n)

  

0.1556

Low energy/high energy

6/10

10/5

 

Time since injury (months)

9.5 (7, 13.3)

8 (4.5, 13)

0.5005

Classification of original fracture

  

0.373

31A1

4

3

 

31A2

2

5

 

31A3

10

7

 

ASA classification (n)

1.5 (1, 2)

2 (1, 2)

0.5539

1/2/3

8/6/2

5/9/1

 

Singh Index Rating (n)

4.5 (3, 6)

4 (3, 5)

0.4058

1/2/3/4/5/6

0/0/5/3/3/5

0/3/3/2/4/3

 

aCCI

2 (0, 4)

4 (1, 4.5)

0.2747

Loss of medial support (n)

10

12

0.4331

Varus deformities (n)

12

15

0.1012

  1. *Independent-samples t-test or Mann–Whitney U test for quantitative data, Chi-square test or Fisher’s Exact test for qualitative data
  2. BMI Body Mass Index, ASA American Association of Anesthesiologists, aCCI Age-Corrected Charlson Complications Index