General self-efficacy and social support in men and women with pain – irregular sex patterns of cross-sectional and longitudinal associations in a general population sample

Table 6 Prevalence no frequent pain at follow-up, among men and women with frequent pain at baseline

	Strong ESS Prevalence, 95% CI¹ Adjusted [Unadjusted]	Mixed ESS Prevalence, 95% CI Adjusted [Unadjusted]	Weak ESS Prevalence, 95% CI Adjusted [Unadjusted]	Prevalence ratio of strong/weak ESS Adjusted [Unadjusted]
Men	28 (21–36) [33 (27–40)]	41 (27–56) [44 (31–58)]	39 (24–57) [42 (27–60)]	0.72 [0.79]
Women	31 (26–38) [38 (34–42)]	29 (19–42) [34 (24–47)]	20 (11–34) [24 (14–38)]	1.55 [1.58]

Analyses are based on the binary logistic regression presented in Table 5. Results are stratified in groups of strong, mixed or weak emotional social support (ESS) at baseline. Prevalence and prevalence ratio are presented
¹CI confidence interval

ISSN: 1471-2474