Skip to main content

Table 5 Prospective associations between psychosocial factors at baseline and no frequent pain at follow-up

From: General self-efficacy and social support in men and women with pain – irregular sex patterns of cross-sectional and longitudinal associations in a general population sample

 

Unadjusted models

Adjusted models (age, education, place of birth)

OR1

95% CI2

p-value

OR

95% CI

p-value

GSE (general self-efficacy)

Men (women = ref3)

0.94

0.70–1.26

0.677

1.01

0.75–1.37

0.931

High GSE (low = ref)

0.75

0.56–1.01

0.059

0.80

0.59–1.08

0.149

Men

High GSE (low = ref)

0.74

0.43–1.27

0.284

0.78

0.44–1.36

0.378

Women

High GSE (low = ref)

0.76

0.53–1.07

0.119

0.81

0.57–1.17

0.261

ISS (instrumental social support)

Men (women = ref)

0.97

0.72–1.31

0.856

1.03

0.76–1.40

0.839

ISS strong (weak = ref)

2.03

1.21–3.55

0.009

1.71

1.01–3.02

0.054

ISS mixed (weak = ref)

1.86

1.08–3.30

0.029

1.73

1.00–3.10

0.057

Men

ISS strong (weak = ref)

1.72

0.68–4.96

0.278

1.35

0.51–4.01

0.562

ISS mixed (weak = ref)

1.85

0.70–5.48

0.233

1.62

0.60–4.88

0.360

Women

ISS strong (weak = ref)

2.19

1.19–4.28

0.016

1.89

1.01–3.74

0.056

ISS mixed (weak = ref)

1.85

0.97–3.69

0.070

1.74

0.91–3.52

0.106

With interaction

Men (women = ref)

1.12

0.35–3.27

0.841

1.23

0.38–3.65

0.710

ISS strong (weak = ref)

2.19

1.19–4.28

0.016

1.87

1.00–3.69

0.059

ISS mixed (weak = ref)

1.85

0.97–3.69

0.070

1.74

0.91–3.50

0.107

ISS (strong)*4Sex (male)

0.78

0.25–2.65

0.683

0.75

0.24–2.56

0.634

ISS (mixed)*Sex (male)

1.00

0.31–3.52

0.997

0.96

0.29–3.41

0.951

ESS (emotional social support)

Men (women = ref)

0.98

0.73–1.32

0.902

1.03

0.76–1.40

0.069

ESS strong (weak = ref)

1.23

0.76–2.06

0.412

1.14

0.69–1.92

0.623

ESS mixed (weak = ref)

1.36

0.74–2.52

0.330

1.34

0.72–2.50

0.360

Men

ESS strong (weak = ref)

0.67

0.32–1.44

0.293

0.60

0.28–1.30

0.187

ESS mixed (weak = ref)

1.06

0.43–2.61

0.906

1.07

0.43–2.70

0.881

Women

ESS strong (weak = ref)

1.94

0.99–4.09

0.065

1.82

0.92–3.88

0.101

ESS mixed (weak = ref)

1.67

0.72–4.05

0.242

1.63

0.69–4.00

0.275

With interaction

Men (women = ref)

2.34

0.90–6.29

0.084

2.51

0.95–6.86

0.067

ESS strong (weak = ref)

1.94

0.99–4.09

0.065

1.81

0.91–3.87

0.102

ESS mixed (weak = ref)

1.67

0.72–4.05

0.242

1.63

0.69–4.00

0.276

ESS (strong)*Sex (male)

0.35

0.12–0.96

0.042

0.34

0.12–0.94

0.040

ESS (mixed)*Sex (male)

0.63

0.18–2.18

0.468

0.66

0.19–2.33

0.520

  1. Binary logistic regression was used to model the prevalence of no frequent pain at follow-up among men and women with frequent pain at baseline. Predictors in the model: General self-efficacy (GSE), instrumental social support (ISS) and emotional social support (ESS) at baseline, respectively, and sex. Interaction included
  2. 1OR odds ratio, 2CI confidence interval, 3ref reference group, 4* interaction