Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Comparing the effectiveness of 3D printing technology in the treatment of clavicular fracture between surgeons with different experiences

Original Submission
5 Jul 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Aug 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
16 Aug 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
17 Aug 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
12 Sep 2022 Author responded Author comments - Mengqiang Xiao
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Sep 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 Sep 2022 Author responded Author comments - Mengqiang Xiao
Resubmission - Version 4
19 Sep 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 4
17 Oct 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
8 Nov 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
9 Nov 2022 Editorially accepted
22 Nov 2022 Article published 10.1186/s12891-022-05972-9

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page