Skip to main content

Table 2 Clinical outcomes

From: Comparison between single-segment Isobar EVO dynamic stabilization and Isobar TTL dynamic stabilization in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a single center retrospective study over 4 years

 

TTL (n = 39)

EVO (n = 41)

ODI%

VAS (Back)

VAS (Leg)

ODI%

VAS (Back)

VAS (Leg)

Pre-operation

66.34 ± 9.65

6.18 ± 1.02

6.62 ± 1.66

63.18 ± 7.45

6.39 ± 0.74

6.87 ± 1.12

Final follow-up

11.83 ± 3.71

1.13 ± 0.73†

1.13 ± 0.80†

10.76 ± 3.62†

0.80 ± 0.71*†

0.78 ± 0.65#†

P

< 0.01

< 0.01

< 0.01

< 0.01

< 0.01

< 0.01

P*

0.104

0.238

0.861

   

P#

   

0.199

0.049

0.041

  1. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation
  2. ODI, Oswestry disability index; VAS, visual analogue scale
  3. *Significant difference preoperatively follow-up between the TTL and EVO groups using the Independent two-sample t-test, P < 0.05
  4. #Significant difference at the final follow-up between the TTL and EVO groups using the Independent two-sample t-test, P < 0.05
  5. †Significant difference between pre- and post-operative condition in each group using the paired t-test, P < 0.05