Skip to main content

Table 4 Radiographic and clinical outcome of cage position, cage height subgroup analysis

From: Effects of the cage height and positioning on clinical and radiographic outcome of lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective study

Parameters

Cage position

Cage height

Anterior(N = 48)

Posterior(N = 22)

Significance(P)

11 mm(N = 34)

13 mm(N = 36)

Significance(P)

Regional Sagittal Lumbar Lordosis (°)

 Preoperative Value

35.1 ± 12.6

39.1 ± 8.2

0.179

32.2 ± 14.2

40.2 ± 14.2

0.004*

 Postoperative Value

27.7 ± 15.3

32.1 ± 14.0

0.288

26.8 ± 14.7

31.3 ± 15.1

0.006*

 Follow-Up Value

37.9 ± 7.4

39.8 ± 5.2

0.315

36.2 ± 7.8

40.6 ± 4.8

0.021*

 Preoperative To Postoperative Increase

2.8 ± 6.4

0.7 ± 3.5

0.149

4.0 ± 7.2

0.5 ± 2.9

0.011*

 Preoperative To Latest of Follow-Up Increase

2.8 ± 6.5

0.4 ± 4.0

0.128

4.3 ± 7.3

−0.1 ± 2.9

0.002*

Foraminal Height (mm)

 Preoperative Value

13.9 ± 1.5

14.8 ± 1.5

0.029*

13.7 ± 1.7

14.6 ± 1.3

0.022*

 Postoperative Value

15.7 ± 2.8

16.1 ± 2.8

0.514

15.5 ± 3.0

16.1 ± 2.6

0.375

 Follow-Up Valuea

16.5 ± 1.2

16.7 ± 0.8

0.707

16.5 ± 0.9

16.6 ± 1.2

0.8

 Preoperative To Postoperative Increase

1.7 ± 2.5

1.4 ± 2.8

0.601

1.8 ± 2.7

1.4 ± 2.4

0.569

 Preoperative To Latest of Follow-Up Increase

2.8 ± 1.8

2.3 ± 1.5

0.453

3.3 ± 1.6

1.7 ± 1.4

0.004*

Disc Height (mm)

 Preoperative Value

6.5 ± 2.3

7.7 ± 2.4

0.047*

6.1 ± 2.5

7.7 ± 2.0

0.003*

 Postoperative Value

8.6 ± 1.5

9.3 ± 1.2

0.053

8.7 ± 1.3

8.9 ± 1.6

0.596

 Follow-Up Value

8.7 ± 1.7

9.0 ± 1.2

0.561

8.6 ± 1.4

9.0 ± 1.7

0.312

 Preoperative To Postoperative Increase

2.1 ± 1.8

1.6 ± 1.6

0.278

2.6 ± 1.9

1.3 ± 1.4

0.001*

 Preoperative To Latest of Follow-Up Increase

2.2 ± 2.0

1.2 ± 1.5

0.043*

2.6 ± 2.0

1.3 ± 1.6

0.023*

 Latest Follow-Up To Postoperative Decrease (Subsidence)

0.13 ± 1.1

−0.35 ± 0.38

0.047*

−0.06 ± 0.9

0.02 ± 0.99

0.713

Segmental Lordosis (°)

 Preoperative Value

5.3 ± 3.1

6.2 ± 2.9

0.248

4.2 ± 3.0

6.9 ± 2.5

0.0001*

 Postoperative Value

11.6 ± 4.8

10.4 ± 5.2

0.32

11.9 ± 4.7

10.6 ± 5.2

0.273

 Follow-Up Value

7.1 ± 2.0

6.6 ± 1.4

0.266

6.8 ± 1.4

7.1 ± 2.2

0.514

 Preoperative To Postoperative Increase

6.3 ± 5.6

4.1 ± 5.2

0.128

7.7 ± 5.2

3.7 ± 5.3

0.002*

 Preoperative To Latest of Follow-Up Increase

1.8 ± 2.5

0.4 ± 2.3

0.025*

2.6 ± 2.7

0.2 ± 1.6

0.0001*

CSA of Thecal Sac (mm2)

 Preoperative Value

134.3 ± 23.5

142.5 ± 20.4

0.162

138.1 ± 24.3

135.8 ± 21.5

0.67

 Postoperative Value

179.0 ± 14.6

176.3 ± 17.8

0.505

179.2 ± 16.0

177.2 ± 15.3

0.582

 Follow-Up Valuea

174.4 ± 10.8

172.3 ± 5.8

0.443

172.3 ± 8.9

175.1 ± 9.1

0.358

 Preoperative To Postoperative Increase

44.7 ± 29.5

33.8 ± 26.3

0.142

41.1 ± 32.9

41.4 ± 24.9

0.969

 Preoperative To Latest of Follow-Up Increase

38.2 ± 29.6

31.8 ± 24.3

0.494

35.2 ± 25.8

36.0 ± 30.1

0.932

VAS Back Pain

 Preoperative To the Last Follow-Up Improvement

2.33 ± 0.98

2.4 ± 0.6

0.738

2.2 ± 0.9

2.5 ± 0.8

0.214

VAS Leg Pain

 Preoperative To Last Follow-Up Improvement

2.6 ± 1.1

2.6 ± 0.9

0.900

2.5 ± 0.7

2.6 ± 1.0

0.622

ODI

 Preoperative To Last Follow-Up Improvement

20.7% ± 10.6%

20.4% ± 8.0%

0.912

19.0% ± 7.2%

19.2% ± 9.8%

0.929

  1. ODI indicates Oswestry Disability Index, VAS Visual analog scores
  2. * P<0.05 are considered statistically significant. a Corresponding radiographic parameters obtained from 26 cases with 36 operated levels with CT and MR images at the final follow-up