Table 2 Demographic data and outcomes of patients treated with frozen autograft in previous studies
Author Published year | Tsuchiya 2005 | Tsuchiya 2010 | Igarashi 2014 | Paholpak 2015 | Zekry 2017 | Garg 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cases | 28 | 33 | 36 | 12 | 34 | 10 |
Follow-up (months) Mean (range) | 28.1 (10-54) | 30 (7-69) | 101 (16-163) | Median 32 (12-86) | 62 (24-214) | 39.6 (6-97) |
Rate of bony union | 92.9% | 93.9% | 83.3% | 100% | 97.1% | 93.8% |
Union period (months) Mean (range) | 6.7 | 7.3 | 6.2 (2-11) | 8.2 (3-12) | 10.2 (3-36) | 5.2 (4-7) |
Function (MSTS score) Mean (range) | 71.4% Excellent 10.7%Good 10.7%Fair 3 | 75.7% Excellent 15.1%Good 9%Fair | 72.2%Excellent 19.4%Good 8.3%Fair | 79% (66.7-93.3%) | 86.8% (30-100%) | 80.2% (75-85%) |
Complications | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Infection (NO./percentage) | 3/10.7% | 4/12.1% | 4/11.1% | 3/25% | 2/5.9% | 0 |
Recurrence (NO./percentage) | 2/7.1% | 3/9.1% | 4/11.1% | 1/8.3% | 4/11.8% | 0 |
Fracture(NO./percentage) | 2/7.1% | 3/9.1% | 7/19.4% | 1/8.3% | 6/17.6% | 0 |
Nonunion(NO./percentage) | 2/7.1% | 2/6.1% | 6/16.7% | 0 | 5/14.7% | 1/10% |