Skip to main content

Table 3 ICC results between radiologists 1 and 2

From: Comparison of region-of-interest delineation methods for diffusion tensor imaging in patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy

 

FA

ADC

Radiologists 1 and 2

ICC

P

ICC

P

Measurement 1

 Free hand

0.889 (0.804 to 0.939)

<0.001

0.918 (0.853 to 0.955)

<0.001

 The single largest round

0.914 (0.846 to 0.953)

<0.001

0.973 (0.950 to 0.985)

<0.001

 Single rectangle

0.839 (0.720 to 0.910)

<0.001

0.817 (0.686 to 0.897)

<0.001

 Four-small rounds

0.832 (0.709 to 0.906)

<0.001

0.872 (0.775 to 0.929)

<0.001

Measurement 2

 Free hand

0.858 (0.751 to 0.921)

<0.001

0.833 (0.711 to 0.907)

<0.001

 The single largest round

0.926 (0.866 to 0.959)

<0.001

0.904 (0.828 to 0.947)

<0.001

 Single rectangle

0.734 (0.559 to 0.847)

<0.001

0.684 (0.484 to 0.817)

<0.001

 Four-small rounds

0.642 (0.421 to 0.791)

<0.001

0.650 (0.432 to 0.796)

<0.001

  1. FA fractional anisotropy, ADC apparent diffusion coefficient, ICC intra-class correlation coefficient