Outcome | Definition | Method of Collection (Level of analysis) |
---|---|---|
Acceptability | Satisfaction with various aspects of the programme | Survey on beliefs (Providers and patients); Survey on satisfaction at 3 months and 12 months post-programme (Providers and patients) Interview with providers: “Were you satisfied with the programme?” Interview with patients: “Were you satisfied with the programme?” |
Adoption | Uptake and utilisation of the programme | Registry: Recording the number of referral sources, sites trained vs. sites implementing, trained physiotherapists and participant registrations from private and primary care settings (Providers and patients) |
Appropriateness | Perceived fit, relevance, or compatibility of the programme for a given setting, provider, or consumer; and/or to address a particular issue or problem | Survey on beliefs (Providers and patients); Survey on satisfaction at 3 months post-programme (Providers and patients) Interview with providers: “How compatible is the GLA:D programme in your setting?” Interview with providers and patients: “Does the programme address a particular issue or problem?” |
Cost | The financial impact of the implementation | Survey on barriers from WP1 (Providers and patients), Health utilisation and sick leave/medication use survey at 3 months and 12 months post-programme (Patients) Cost-effectiveness analysis Interview with providers and patients: “Have there been any cost implications?” |
Feasibility | The extent to which the programme can be successfully used or carried out within a given setting | Collected with a survey at training course with strategies to overcome specific feasibility barriers discussed (Providers) |
Fidelity | The degree to which the programme is implemented as it was prescribed in the original protocol | Interview with providers: “Did you make specific changes to the original programme? What did you change?” |
Penetration | The integration of a practice within a service setting and its subsystems | Registry: recording the number screened during the study period and reporting of the absolute number and proportion of those who participated in the program as well as the number of referral sources (Providers); |
Sustainability | The extent to which the implemented programme is maintained | Number of sites still running the programme at 12 months and by the end of the project (Providers); Physical activity and exercise participation at 3 and 12 months (Patients) Interview with providers: “Do you intend to continue delivering the programme?” Interview with patients: “Do you intend to continue doing the exercises?” |