Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Evaluation of double-high insert mid-term outcomes in cruciate-retaining medial-pivotal total knee arthroplasty – a propensity score-matched analysis with averaged 8-year follow-up

Original Submission
16 Sep 2021 Submitted Original manuscript
31 Oct 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
1 Nov 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
19 Nov 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gregory Wernecke
8 Apr 2022 Author responded Author comments - Haining Zhang
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Apr 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 Apr 2022 Author responded Author comments - Haining Zhang
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Apr 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Apr 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
12 May 2022 Author responded Author comments - Haining Zhang
Resubmission - Version 4
12 May 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 4
15 May 2022 Author responded Author comments - Haining Zhang
Resubmission - Version 5
15 May 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 5
19 May 2022 Author responded Author comments - Haining Zhang
Resubmission - Version 6
19 May 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 6
20 May 2022 Author responded Author comments - Haining Zhang
Resubmission - Version 7
20 May 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
23 May 2022 Editorially accepted
14 Jun 2022 Article published 10.1186/s12891-022-05484-6

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page